Majority of US urban natural gas emissions unaccounted for in inventories.
greenhouse gas emissions
methane
natural gas
urban
Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN: 1091-6490
Titre abrégé: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7505876
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 11 2021
02 11 2021
Historique:
accepted:
07
09
2021
entrez:
26
10
2021
pubmed:
27
10
2021
medline:
27
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Across many cities, estimates of methane emissions from natural gas (NG) distribution and end use based on atmospheric measurements have generally been more than double bottom-up estimates. We present a top-down study of NG methane emissions from the Boston urban region spanning 8 y (2012 to 2020) to assess total emissions, their seasonality, and trends. We used methane and ethane observations from five sites in and around Boston, combined with a high-resolution transport model, to calculate methane emissions of 76 ± 18 Gg/yr, with 49 ± 9 Gg/yr attributed to NG losses. We found no significant trend in the NG loss rate over 8 y, despite efforts from the city and state to increase the rate of repairing NG pipeline leaks. We estimate that 2.5 ± 0.5% of the gas entering the urban region is lost, approximately three times higher than bottom-up estimates. We saw a strong correlation between top-down NG emissions and NG consumed on a seasonal basis. This suggests that consumption-driven losses, such as in transmission or end-use, may be a large component of emissions that is missing from inventories, and require future policy action. We also compared top-down NG emission estimates from six US cities, all of which indicate significant missing sources in bottom-up inventories. Across these cities, we estimate NG losses from distribution and end use amount to 20 to 36% of all losses from the US NG supply chain, with a total loss rate of 3.3 to 4.7% of NG from well pad to urban consumer, notably larger than the current Environmental Protection Agency estimate of 1.4% [R. A. Alvarez
Identifiants
pubmed: 34697236
pii: 2105804118
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105804118
pmc: PMC8612348
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interest.
Références
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Oct 1;53(19):11285-11293
pubmed: 31486640
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jan 7;54(1):39-49
pubmed: 31809030
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 May 5;54(9):5737-5745
pubmed: 32250600
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Aug 16;50(16):8910-7
pubmed: 27487422
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jul 15;48(14):8028-34
pubmed: 24945706
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 7;53(9):5473-5482
pubmed: 30908909
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 3;49(5):3252-61
pubmed: 25668051
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Sep 4;52(17):10205-10213
pubmed: 30071722
Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):186-188
pubmed: 29930092
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Aug 4;49(15):9374-83
pubmed: 26195284
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jul 17;115(29):7491-7496
pubmed: 29967154
Geophys Res Lett. 2019 Jul 28;46(14):8500-8507
pubmed: 31762518
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 6;50(23):13123-13133
pubmed: 27934278
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 17;112(7):1941-6
pubmed: 25617375
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Jul 21;54(14):8958-8967
pubmed: 32519849