Resistance Testing for Management of HIV Virologic Failure in Sub-Saharan Africa : An Unblinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Adult
Alkynes
/ therapeutic use
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active
Benzoxazines
/ therapeutic use
Cyclopropanes
/ therapeutic use
Drug Resistance, Viral
Emtricitabine
/ therapeutic use
Female
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
South Africa
Tenofovir
/ therapeutic use
Uganda
Viral Load
Journal
Annals of internal medicine
ISSN: 1539-3704
Titre abrégé: Ann Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372351
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
27
10
2021
medline:
15
2
2022
entrez:
26
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Virologic failure in HIV predicts the development of drug resistance and mortality. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT), which is the standard of care after virologic failure in high-income settings, is rarely implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. To estimate the effectiveness of GRT for improving virologic suppression rates among people with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa for whom first-line therapy fails. Pragmatic, unblinded, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02787499). Ambulatory HIV clinics in the public sector in Uganda and South Africa. Adults receiving first-line antiretroviral therapy with a recent HIV RNA viral load of 1000 copies/mL or higher. Participants were randomly assigned to receive standard of care (SOC), including adherence counseling sessions and repeated viral load testing, or immediate GRT. The primary outcome of interest was achievement of an HIV RNA viral load below 200 copies/mL 9 months after enrollment. The trial enrolled 840 persons, divided equally between countries. Approximately half (51%) were women. Most (72%) were receiving a regimen of tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz at enrollment. The rate of virologic suppression did not differ 9 months after enrollment between the GRT group (63% [263 of 417]) and SOC group (61% [256 of 423]; odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.49]; Participants were receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy at enrollment, limiting the generalizability of the findings. The addition of GRT to routine care after first-line virologic failure in Uganda and South Africa did not improve rates of resuppression. The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Virologic failure in HIV predicts the development of drug resistance and mortality. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT), which is the standard of care after virologic failure in high-income settings, is rarely implemented in sub-Saharan Africa.
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the effectiveness of GRT for improving virologic suppression rates among people with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa for whom first-line therapy fails.
DESIGN
Pragmatic, unblinded, randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02787499).
SETTING
Ambulatory HIV clinics in the public sector in Uganda and South Africa.
PATIENTS
Adults receiving first-line antiretroviral therapy with a recent HIV RNA viral load of 1000 copies/mL or higher.
INTERVENTION
Participants were randomly assigned to receive standard of care (SOC), including adherence counseling sessions and repeated viral load testing, or immediate GRT.
MEASUREMENTS
The primary outcome of interest was achievement of an HIV RNA viral load below 200 copies/mL 9 months after enrollment.
RESULTS
The trial enrolled 840 persons, divided equally between countries. Approximately half (51%) were women. Most (72%) were receiving a regimen of tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz at enrollment. The rate of virologic suppression did not differ 9 months after enrollment between the GRT group (63% [263 of 417]) and SOC group (61% [256 of 423]; odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.49];
LIMITATION
Participants were receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based therapy at enrollment, limiting the generalizability of the findings.
CONCLUSION
The addition of GRT to routine care after first-line virologic failure in Uganda and South Africa did not improve rates of resuppression.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE
The President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34698502
doi: 10.7326/M21-2229
pmc: PMC8688215
mid: NIHMS1739605
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alkynes
0
Benzoxazines
0
Cyclopropanes
0
Tenofovir
99YXE507IL
Emtricitabine
G70B4ETF4S
efavirenz
JE6H2O27P8
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02787499']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1683-1692Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : K23 AI143470
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI124718
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI060354
Pays : United States
Organisme : PEPFAR
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;18(1):47-57
pubmed: 29108797
J Med Econ. 2020 Mar;23(3):221-227
pubmed: 31835974
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0220337
pubmed: 31461455
S Afr Med J. 2016 Dec 21;107(1):28-30
pubmed: 28112085
PLoS Med. 2015 Nov 24;12(11):e1001906
pubmed: 26599825
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 19;10(2):e0116144
pubmed: 25695494
PLoS Med. 2020 Feb 25;17(2):e1003037
pubmed: 32097428
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 2;10(1):5482
pubmed: 31792217
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Dec 01;19(1):21484
pubmed: 27914186
N Engl J Med. 2000 Mar 30;342(13):921-9
pubmed: 10738050
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 22;385(4):330-341
pubmed: 34289276
AIDS. 2002 Mar 8;16(4):579-88
pubmed: 11873001
AIDS. 2005 Feb 18;19(3):295-302
pubmed: 15718840
AIDS. 2009 Jul 17;23(11):1397-404
pubmed: 19381076
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Dec 15;49(12):1928-35
pubmed: 19911963
PLoS Med. 2020 May 13;17(5):e1003107
pubmed: 32401797
AIDS. 2002 Jan 25;16(2):209-18
pubmed: 11807305
AIDS. 2015 Jul 31;29(12):1473-81
pubmed: 26244387
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jan 1;48(1):115-122
pubmed: 20380075
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Nov;16(11):e267-e275
pubmed: 27569762
Lancet. 2013 Jun 15;381(9883):2091-9
pubmed: 23769235
Top Antivir Med. 2019 Sep/Oct;27(3):111-121
pubmed: 31634862
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):582
pubmed: 28830382
J AIDS Clin Res. 2011 Feb 18;2(117):
pubmed: 21927716
Lancet. 1999 Jun 26;353(9171):2195-9
pubmed: 10392984
J Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;223(7):1150-1160
pubmed: 33471100
HIV Clin Trials. 2017 Jul;18(4):149-155
pubmed: 28720039
HIV Med. 2020 Aug;21(7):457-462
pubmed: 32495515
AIDS. 2014 Sep 10;28(14):2097-107
pubmed: 24977440
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 May 2;66(10):1487-1491
pubmed: 29324994
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Mar;19(3):253-264
pubmed: 30732940
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Lancet HIV. 2020 Sep;7(9):e620-e628
pubmed: 32890497