Does obesity affect acetabular cup position, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment? A prospective investigation with standing and sitting assessment of primary hip arthroplasty patients.
BMI
Dislocation
Hip replacement
Obesity
Sagittal spinal alignment
Spinopelvic mobility
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Oct 2021
26 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
13
07
2021
accepted:
10
09
2021
entrez:
27
10
2021
pubmed:
28
10
2021
medline:
22
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability is influenced by acetabular component positioning, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment. Obesity is considered as a risk factor of THA instability, but the causal relationship remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the influence of BMI on (1) spinopelvic function (lumbar flexibility, pelvic mobility and hip motion), (2) sagittal spinal alignment pre- and postoperatively and (3) acetabular cup position postoperatively in primary THA patients in a prospective setting. One hundred ninety patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and retrospectively analysed. All patients received stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and relaxed sitting position pre-and postoperatively. C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) were assessed. Key parameters of the spinopelvic function were defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL Standing cup inclination was significant higher in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (45.3° vs. 40.1°; p = 0.015) whereas standing cup anteversion was significantly decreased (22.0° vs. 25.3°; p = 0.011). There were no significant differences for spinopelvic function key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ PT) and hip motion (∆ PFA) in relation to BMI stratified groups. The obese group demonstrated significant enhanced pelvic retroversion compared to the normal BMI group (APPT - 1.8° vs. 2.4°; p = 0.028). The preoperative proportion of stiff pelvic mobility was decreased in the obese group (12.2%) compared to normal (25.0%) and overweight (27.2%) groups. Spinal sagittal alignment in C7-SVA and PI-LL mismatch demonstrated significantly greater imbalance in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (68.6 mm vs. 42.6 mm, p = 0.002 and 7.7° vs. 1.2°, p = 0.032, respectively) The proportion of patients with imbalanced C7-SVA was higher in the obese (58.5%) than in the normal BMI group (44.1%). The significantly increased spinal sagittal imbalance with altered pelvic mechanics is a potential cause for the reported increased risk of THA dislocations in obese patients. Consequently, the increased spinal sagittal imbalance in combination with normal pelvic mobility need to be taken into account when performing THA in obese patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) instability is influenced by acetabular component positioning, spinopelvic function and sagittal spinal alignment. Obesity is considered as a risk factor of THA instability, but the causal relationship remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the influence of BMI on (1) spinopelvic function (lumbar flexibility, pelvic mobility and hip motion), (2) sagittal spinal alignment pre- and postoperatively and (3) acetabular cup position postoperatively in primary THA patients in a prospective setting.
METHODS
METHODS
One hundred ninety patients receiving primary total hip arthroplasty were enrolled in a prospective cohort study and retrospectively analysed. All patients received stereoradiography (EOS) in standing and relaxed sitting position pre-and postoperatively. C7-sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), anterior plane pelvic tilt (APPT), and pelvic femoral angle (PFA) were assessed. Key parameters of the spinopelvic function were defined as lumbar flexibility (∆ LL = LL
RESULTS
RESULTS
Standing cup inclination was significant higher in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (45.3° vs. 40.1°; p = 0.015) whereas standing cup anteversion was significantly decreased (22.0° vs. 25.3°; p = 0.011). There were no significant differences for spinopelvic function key parameter lumbar flexibility (∆ LL), pelvic mobility (∆ PT) and hip motion (∆ PFA) in relation to BMI stratified groups. The obese group demonstrated significant enhanced pelvic retroversion compared to the normal BMI group (APPT - 1.8° vs. 2.4°; p = 0.028). The preoperative proportion of stiff pelvic mobility was decreased in the obese group (12.2%) compared to normal (25.0%) and overweight (27.2%) groups. Spinal sagittal alignment in C7-SVA and PI-LL mismatch demonstrated significantly greater imbalance in the obese group compared to the normal BMI group (68.6 mm vs. 42.6 mm, p = 0.002 and 7.7° vs. 1.2°, p = 0.032, respectively) The proportion of patients with imbalanced C7-SVA was higher in the obese (58.5%) than in the normal BMI group (44.1%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The significantly increased spinal sagittal imbalance with altered pelvic mechanics is a potential cause for the reported increased risk of THA dislocations in obese patients. Consequently, the increased spinal sagittal imbalance in combination with normal pelvic mobility need to be taken into account when performing THA in obese patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34702301
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02716-8
pii: 10.1186/s13018-021-02716-8
pmc: PMC8547029
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
640Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):291-296
pubmed: 28939031
Bone Joint J. 2017 Feb;99-B(2):184-191
pubmed: 28148659
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):310-321
pubmed: 30300162
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):845-852
pubmed: 29954196
Eur Spine J. 2021 Sep;30(9):2443-2449
pubmed: 32918604
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:564-71
pubmed: 21830079
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):387-91
pubmed: 25453626
Bone Joint J. 2014 Mar;96-B(3):360-5
pubmed: 24589792
Curr Obes Rep. 2018 Dec;7(4):276-288
pubmed: 30155850
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1289-1296
pubmed: 30295534
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Sep;471(9):2987-94
pubmed: 23645336
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Mar 10;10:291-6
pubmed: 27022251
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2124-2130
pubmed: 32307288
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):902-909
pubmed: 31362559
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):E599-606
pubmed: 19644319
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1788-97
pubmed: 27020429
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452
pubmed: 8594834
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1913-20
pubmed: 26631991
Acta Orthop. 2008 Feb;79(1):141-7
pubmed: 18283586
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):297-300
pubmed: 28974376
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 08;9(8):
pubmed: 32784374
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):51-6
pubmed: 18165028
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 1;40(9):642-9
pubmed: 25705962
Bone Joint J. 2019 Feb;101-B(2):198-206
pubmed: 30700125
Int Orthop. 2011 Jun;35(6):929-34
pubmed: 20512328
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S255-S261
pubmed: 32205003
J Arthroplasty. 2013 May;28(5):714-21
pubmed: 23518425
Hip Int. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):263-9
pubmed: 24817400
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Dec;465:185-8
pubmed: 17906592
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1178-82
pubmed: 21911527
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6:S834-41
pubmed: 24052406
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e533-e545
pubmed: 30165222
Spine J. 2017 May;17(5):681-688
pubmed: 27916684
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 19;100(18):1606-1615
pubmed: 30234627
Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):67-9
pubmed: 24187356
Arthroplast Today. 2020 May 21;6(3):590-595.e1
pubmed: 32995406
Am J Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;169(1):13-5
pubmed: 22223009
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2259-65
pubmed: 19363640
Eur Spine J. 2006 Apr;15(4):415-22
pubmed: 16179995
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Mar;90(3):360-3
pubmed: 18310761
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Feb;469(2):319-29
pubmed: 20717858
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):693-699
pubmed: 30616976
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jun;32(6):1910-1917
pubmed: 28153459
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2008 Oct;16(10):2323-30
pubmed: 18719634
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Aug;92(8):1066-71
pubmed: 20675748
Int Orthop. 2010 Feb;34(1):19-26
pubmed: 19214506
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Feb;32(2):211-22
pubmed: 17848940
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Jan 18;7:3
pubmed: 20082692
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(1 Supple A):37-45
pubmed: 28042117
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Oct;90(10):1291-7
pubmed: 18827237
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):128-33
pubmed: 19122087
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:142-6
pubmed: 17016221
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1189-1193
pubmed: 29174406
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):559-568
pubmed: 28373138
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2663-2668
pubmed: 31301908
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr;469(4):1103-9
pubmed: 21161739
Bone Joint J. 2017 Jun;99-B(6):759-765
pubmed: 28566394
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):878-82
pubmed: 23149493
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 18;96(12):978-986
pubmed: 24951732
J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jan;15(1):52-8
pubmed: 10654462
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Sep;103(5):663-668
pubmed: 28629944