The Joint Log-Lift Task: A Social Foraging Paradigm.
affiliation
cooperation
coordination
joint action
prosocial
sociability
social learning
spontaneous
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
22
07
2021
accepted:
09
09
2021
entrez:
28
10
2021
pubmed:
29
10
2021
medline:
29
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Behavioural cooperation is under intense research. Yet, popular experimental paradigms often employ artificial tasks, require training, or do not permit partner choice, possibly limiting their biological relevance. We developed the joint log-lift task, a social foraging paradigm in which animals have to jointly lift a log to each obtain a food reward. The task relies on an obligate strategy, meaning that the only way to benefit is to work jointly. We hypothesised that (1) animals learn to spontaneously solve the task, and that (2) kin and (3) more sociable individuals would engage more often together in the task and achieve greater success than non-kin and less sociable individuals, respectively. We presented the task to 8 groups of juvenile domestic pigs (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34708104
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.745627
pmc: PMC8542970
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
745627Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Rault, Camerlink, Goumon, Mundry and Špinka.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Behav Processes. 2007 Oct;76(2):95-9
pubmed: 17804178
Behav Ecol. 2009 Mar;20(2):416-420
pubmed: 19461866
Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300
pubmed: 16513985
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0169799
pubmed: 28199322
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150091
pubmed: 26729931
J Comp Psychol. 2000 Sep;114(3):297-301
pubmed: 10994846
Anim Cogn. 2020 Mar;23(2):265-275
pubmed: 31760558
Biol Bull. 2002 Jun;202(3):262-7
pubmed: 12086998
Anim Cogn. 2016 Jul;19(4):679-705
pubmed: 27000780
Nature. 2009 Nov 5;462(7269):51-7
pubmed: 19890322
PeerJ. 2014 Jun 12;2:e417
pubmed: 24949236
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 07;5:15021
pubmed: 26442633
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Apr;78(4):547-73
pubmed: 2540662
Behav Ecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;31(2):361-370
pubmed: 32210525
Behav Processes. 2015 Dec;121:80-6
pubmed: 26522932
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Dec;107:370-387
pubmed: 31557550
Soc Neurosci. 2011;6(3):289-301
pubmed: 21061227
Anim Cogn. 2015 Mar;18(2):543-50
pubmed: 25409921
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Jan;65(1):47-55
pubmed: 21297852
Behav Processes. 2004 Jun 30;66(3):261-77
pubmed: 15157976
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Mar 14;285(1874):
pubmed: 29514963
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jun 22;275(1641):1421-9
pubmed: 18364318
Anim Behav. 2000 Mar;59(3):569-576
pubmed: 10715179
Anim Behav. 1997 Nov;54(5):1215-25
pubmed: 9398374
Anim Cogn. 2017 Nov;20(6):1107-1114
pubmed: 28840405
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 19;285(1887):
pubmed: 30232161
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 22;108(12):5116-21
pubmed: 21383191
J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
pubmed: 5875341
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 11;9(6):e99875
pubmed: 24919178
Anim Cogn. 2018 Jan;21(1):87-98
pubmed: 29147914
Curr Biol. 2007 Apr 3;17(7):619-23
pubmed: 17346970
J Comp Psychol. 2015 May;129(2):89-120
pubmed: 25984937