X-ray dark-field chest imaging for detection and quantification of emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Emphysema
/ diagnosis
Female
Forced Expiratory Volume
Germany
Humans
Lung
/ diagnostic imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ diagnostic imaging
Pulmonary Emphysema
/ diagnosis
Radiography
Radiography, Thoracic
/ methods
Severity of Illness Index
Smoking
Thorax
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
/ methods
X-Rays
Journal
The Lancet. Digital health
ISSN: 2589-7500
Titre abrégé: Lancet Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101751302
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
12
01
2021
revised:
05
07
2021
accepted:
09
07
2021
entrez:
29
10
2021
pubmed:
30
10
2021
medline:
7
1
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although advanced medical imaging technologies give detailed diagnostic information, a low-dose, fast, and inexpensive option for early detection of respiratory diseases and follow-ups is still lacking. The novel method of x-ray dark-field chest imaging might fill this gap but has not yet been studied in living humans. Enabling the assessment of microstructural changes in lung parenchyma, this technique presents a more sensitive alternative to conventional chest x-rays, and yet requires only a fraction of the dose applied in CT. We studied the application of this technique to assess pulmonary emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this diagnostic accuracy study, we designed and built a novel dark-field chest x-ray system (Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany)-which is also capable of simultaneously acquiring a conventional thorax radiograph (7 s, 0·035 mSv effective dose). Patients who had undergone a medically indicated chest CT were recruited from the department of Radiology and Pneumology of our site (Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany). Patients with pulmonary pathologies, or conditions other than COPD, that might influence lung parenchyma were excluded. For patients with different disease stages of pulmonary emphysema, x-ray dark-field images and CT images were acquired and visually assessed by five readers. Pulmonary function tests (spirometry and body plethysmography) were performed for every patient and for a subgroup of patients the measurement of diffusion capacity was performed. Individual patient datasets were statistically evaluated using correlation testing, rank-based analysis of variance, and pair-wise post-hoc comparison. Between October, 2018 and December, 2019 we enrolled 77 patients. Compared with CT-based parameters (quantitative emphysema ρ=-0·27, p=0·089 and visual emphysema ρ=-0·45, p=0·0028), the dark-field signal (ρ=0·62, p<0·0001) yields a stronger correlation with lung diffusion capacity in the evaluated cohort. Emphysema assessment based on dark-field chest x-ray features yields consistent conclusions with findings from visual CT image interpretation and shows improved diagnostic performance than conventional clinical tests characterising emphysema. Pair-wise comparison of corresponding test parameters between adjacent visual emphysema severity groups (CT-based, reference standard) showed higher effect sizes. The mean effect size over the group comparisons (absent-trace, trace-mild, mild-moderate, and moderate-confluent or advanced destructive visual emphysema grades) for the COPD assessment test score is 0·21, for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV X-ray dark-field chest imaging allows the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema in patients with COPD because this technique provides relevant information representing the structural condition of lung parenchyma. This technique might offer a low radiation dose alternative to CT in COPD and potentially other lung disorders. European Research Council, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Royal Philips, and Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Although advanced medical imaging technologies give detailed diagnostic information, a low-dose, fast, and inexpensive option for early detection of respiratory diseases and follow-ups is still lacking. The novel method of x-ray dark-field chest imaging might fill this gap but has not yet been studied in living humans. Enabling the assessment of microstructural changes in lung parenchyma, this technique presents a more sensitive alternative to conventional chest x-rays, and yet requires only a fraction of the dose applied in CT. We studied the application of this technique to assess pulmonary emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
METHODS
In this diagnostic accuracy study, we designed and built a novel dark-field chest x-ray system (Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany)-which is also capable of simultaneously acquiring a conventional thorax radiograph (7 s, 0·035 mSv effective dose). Patients who had undergone a medically indicated chest CT were recruited from the department of Radiology and Pneumology of our site (Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany). Patients with pulmonary pathologies, or conditions other than COPD, that might influence lung parenchyma were excluded. For patients with different disease stages of pulmonary emphysema, x-ray dark-field images and CT images were acquired and visually assessed by five readers. Pulmonary function tests (spirometry and body plethysmography) were performed for every patient and for a subgroup of patients the measurement of diffusion capacity was performed. Individual patient datasets were statistically evaluated using correlation testing, rank-based analysis of variance, and pair-wise post-hoc comparison.
FINDINGS
Between October, 2018 and December, 2019 we enrolled 77 patients. Compared with CT-based parameters (quantitative emphysema ρ=-0·27, p=0·089 and visual emphysema ρ=-0·45, p=0·0028), the dark-field signal (ρ=0·62, p<0·0001) yields a stronger correlation with lung diffusion capacity in the evaluated cohort. Emphysema assessment based on dark-field chest x-ray features yields consistent conclusions with findings from visual CT image interpretation and shows improved diagnostic performance than conventional clinical tests characterising emphysema. Pair-wise comparison of corresponding test parameters between adjacent visual emphysema severity groups (CT-based, reference standard) showed higher effect sizes. The mean effect size over the group comparisons (absent-trace, trace-mild, mild-moderate, and moderate-confluent or advanced destructive visual emphysema grades) for the COPD assessment test score is 0·21, for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
INTERPRETATION
X-ray dark-field chest imaging allows the diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema in patients with COPD because this technique provides relevant information representing the structural condition of lung parenchyma. This technique might offer a low radiation dose alternative to CT in COPD and potentially other lung disorders.
FUNDING
European Research Council, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Royal Philips, and Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34711378
pii: S2589-7500(21)00146-1
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00146-1
pmc: PMC8565798
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e733-e744Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests TK is an employee of Philips Innovative Technologies, Research Laboratories, which is part of Royal Philips. AY and TP are employees of Philips Medical System DMC, which is part of Royal Philips. GSZ receives payments for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer Healthcare, and Roche; and receives travel support from Novartis and Roche. FP received a European Research Council Advanced Grant and a hardware loan (x-ray source and detector) from Royal Philips. The authorship of patents related to technical implementation of the demonstrator system are KW has coauthored GB3687403B2 and US20200187893A1; FDM has coauthored GB3687403B2 and US20200187893A1; TU has coauthored PCT/EP2021/063949; TK has coauthored US10417761B2, US10945690B2, GB3687403B2, US10912532B2, PCT/EP2020/082799, PCT/EP2021/057524, PCT/EP2021/064497, PCT/EP2021/063949, and US20200187893A1; AY has coauthored GB3687403B2, US10912532B2, PCT/EP2020/082799, and US20200187893A1; TP has coauthored PCT/EP2020/082799; and FP has coauthored US10945690B2 and PCT/EP2021/063949. Royal Philips is the assignee for all patents listed. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Dec;12(12):1788-95
pubmed: 26524488
Invest Radiol. 2014 Oct;49(10):653-8
pubmed: 24853070
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 01;5:17492
pubmed: 26619958
Eur Respir J. 1997 Jun;10(6):1415-27
pubmed: 9192953
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep 15;176(6):532-55
pubmed: 17507545
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Jul 11;3(1):25
pubmed: 31292790
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 3;14(6):e0217858
pubmed: 31158251
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 18;9(1):8699
pubmed: 31213645
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 24;7(1):402
pubmed: 28341830
Sci Rep. 2013 Nov 13;3:3209
pubmed: 24220606
Invest Radiol. 2016 Oct;51(10):597-601
pubmed: 27603110
Radiology. 2015 Oct;277(1):192-205
pubmed: 25961632
Am J Med. 1987 May;82(5):998-1006
pubmed: 3555069
Eur Respir J. 2005 Sep;26(3):511-22
pubmed: 16135736
Chest. 2018 Dec;154(6):1278-1281
pubmed: 30526967
Radiology. 2018 Sep;288(3):859-866
pubmed: 29762095
J Thorac Dis. 2014 Nov;6(11):1557-69
pubmed: 25478197
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 1;8(1):2096
pubmed: 29391514
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 8;8(1):2602
pubmed: 29422512
Nat Mater. 2008 Feb;7(2):134-7
pubmed: 18204454
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4807
pubmed: 28684858
Radiology. 2008 Jul;248(1):254-63
pubmed: 18566177
Acad Radiol. 2010 Feb;17(2):146-56
pubmed: 19931472
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 27;13(9):e0204565
pubmed: 30261038
Eur Radiol Exp. 2018 Nov 7;2(1):30
pubmed: 30402740
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 13;6:24269
pubmed: 27072871
Radiology. 2013 Nov;269(2):427-33
pubmed: 23696682
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec 1;196(11):1372-1379
pubmed: 28661698
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Nov;197(5):1165-9
pubmed: 22021510
Invest Radiol. 2015 Jul;50(7):430-5
pubmed: 25761095
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1539-49
pubmed: 26098755
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7836):151-156
pubmed: 33149305
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 30;109(44):17880-5
pubmed: 23074250