A Method to Experimentally Estimate the Conductivity of Chronic Stroke Lesions: A Tool to Individualize Transcranial Electric Stimulation.

bioimpedance conductivity measurement electroencephalography stroke lesion tDCS

Journal

Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 08 07 2021
accepted: 20 09 2021
entrez: 29 10 2021
pubmed: 30 10 2021
medline: 30 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The inconsistent response to transcranial electric stimulation in the stroke population is attributed to, among other factors, unknown effects of stroke lesion conductivity on stimulation strength at the targeted brain areas. Volume conduction models are promising tools to determine optimal stimulation settings. However, stroke lesion conductivity is often not considered in these models as a source of inter-subject variability. The goal of this study is to propose a method that combines MRI, EEG, and transcranial stimulation to estimate the conductivity of cortical stroke lesions experimentally. In this simulation study, lesion conductivity was estimated from scalp potentials during transcranial electric stimulation in 12 chronic stroke patients. To do so, first, we determined the stimulation configuration where scalp potentials are maximally affected by the lesion. Then, we calculated scalp potentials in a model with a fixed lesion conductivity and a model with a randomly assigned conductivity. To estimate the lesion conductivity, we minimized the error between the two models by varying the conductivity in the second model. Finally, to reflect realistic experimental conditions, we test the effect rotation of measurement electrode orientation and the effect of the number of electrodes used. We found that the algorithm converged to the correct lesion conductivity value when noise on the electrode positions was absent for all lesions. Conductivity estimation error was below 5% with realistic electrode coregistration errors of 0.1° for lesions larger than 50 ml. Higher lesion conductivities and lesion volumes were associated with smaller estimation errors. In conclusion, this method can experimentally estimate stroke lesion conductivity, improving the accuracy of volume conductor models of stroke patients and potentially leading to more effective transcranial electric stimulation configurations for this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34712128
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.738200
pmc: PMC8546262
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

738200

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 van der Cruijsen, Piastra, Selles and Oostendorp.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Biophys J. 1967 Sep;7(5):463-91
pubmed: 6058137
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Apr 18;15:106-117
pubmed: 28516033
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):447-52
pubmed: 10768534
Front Neurosci. 2014 Mar 11;8:42
pubmed: 24653671
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Apr;17(4):398-409
pubmed: 12655578
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;112(4):713-9
pubmed: 11275545
Arch Neurol. 2008 Dec;65(12):1571-6
pubmed: 19064743
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Apr;37(4):1405-21
pubmed: 26756101
Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):943-9
pubmed: 11283395
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Nov;17(3):179-92
pubmed: 12391571
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 May;113(5):702-12
pubmed: 11976050
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Dec;51(12):2113-22
pubmed: 15605858
J Neural Eng. 2021 Apr 27;18(4):
pubmed: 33735847
Front Neurol. 2017 Feb 09;8:29
pubmed: 28232816
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Sep;32(9):1383-99
pubmed: 20690140
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jun 7;57(11):3517-35
pubmed: 22581305
Phys Med Biol. 2004 Nov 7;49(21):5011-28
pubmed: 15584534
Brain Stimul. 2011 Jul;4(3):169-74
pubmed: 21777878
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1113-24
pubmed: 17337213
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov;89(11):879-86
pubmed: 20962598
Brain Topogr. 2019 Sep;32(5):825-858
pubmed: 31054104
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 21;5:CD009760
pubmed: 31111960
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021 Jan;68(1):308-318
pubmed: 32746015
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000 Nov;47(11):1487-92
pubmed: 11077742
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Mar 7;51(5):1333-46
pubmed: 16481698
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 2;9(1):483
pubmed: 29396478
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):626
pubmed: 30679770

Auteurs

Joris van der Cruijsen (J)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.

Maria Carla Piastra (MC)

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Ruud W Selles (RW)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Thom F Oostendorp (TF)

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH