An Embodied Cognition Perspective on the Role of Interoception in the Development of the Minimal Self.
bodily self
cardioception
development of minimal self
embodied cognition
interoception
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
01
06
2021
accepted:
06
09
2021
entrez:
29
10
2021
pubmed:
30
10
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Interoception is an often neglected but crucial aspect of the human minimal self. In this perspective, we extend the embodiment account of interoceptive inference to explain the development of the minimal self in humans. To do so, we first provide a comparative overview of the central accounts addressing the link between interoception and the minimal self. Grounding our arguments on the embodiment framework, we propose a bidirectional relationship between motor and interoceptive states, which jointly contribute to the development of the minimal self. We present empirical findings on interoception in development and discuss the role of interoception in the development of the minimal self. Moreover, we make theoretical predictions that can be tested in future experiments. Our goal is to provide a comprehensive view on the mechanisms underlying the minimal self by explaining the role of interoception in the development of the minimal self.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34712171
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716950
pmc: PMC8547517
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
716950Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Musculus, Tünte, Raab and Kayhan.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Mar;122:190-200
pubmed: 33450331
Conscious Cogn. 2021 May;91:103117
pubmed: 33872985
Psychol Sci. 2014 May 1;25(5):1124-31
pubmed: 24681587
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):692-704
pubmed: 22389201
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Apr;138:47-56
pubmed: 30731102
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Apr;70(4):597-609
pubmed: 27100132
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 22;278(1717):2470-6
pubmed: 21208964
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 28;12:633100
pubmed: 33995187
Dev Sci. 2018 May;21(3):e12557
pubmed: 28326654
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 01;13:961480
pubmed: 35846650
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2909-17
pubmed: 23993906
Psychophysiology. 2014 Sep;51(9):932-41
pubmed: 24810627
Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 28;6:502
pubmed: 25972827
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 20;9:180
pubmed: 29515495
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):14-21
pubmed: 10637618
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;142:230-8
pubmed: 26601752
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 07;10:1825
pubmed: 31440188
Lancet. 2011 Mar 19;377(9770):1011-8
pubmed: 21411136
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 01;7:845
pubmed: 27313562
Front Psychol. 2012 Jan 10;2:395
pubmed: 22291673
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36
pubmed: 12613670
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 7;9(1):16184
pubmed: 31700095
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Feb;23:45-56
pubmed: 28081519
J Clin Psychol. 2021 Mar;77(3):661-682
pubmed: 33035384
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;22(11):969-981
pubmed: 30224233
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;71(10):1192-3
pubmed: 25103620
Elife. 2017 Aug 08;6:
pubmed: 28784203
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Feb;166:134-146
pubmed: 28888193
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Jun;17(2):411-24
pubmed: 18411059
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 29;9:1423
pubmed: 30210379
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1353-70
pubmed: 24683098