Predicting Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) as Interpretable Intermediate Representation in a Clinical Decision-Support System for Audiology.
CAFPAs
audiology
clinical decision-support systems
interpretable machine learning
machine learning
precision diagnostics
Journal
Frontiers in digital health
ISSN: 2673-253X
Titre abrégé: Front Digit Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101771889
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
19
08
2020
accepted:
26
11
2020
entrez:
29
10
2021
pubmed:
30
10
2021
medline:
30
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The application of machine learning for the development of clinical decision-support systems in audiology provides the potential to improve the objectivity and precision of clinical experts' diagnostic decisions. However, for successful clinical application, such a tool needs to be accurate, as well as accepted and trusted by physicians. In the field of audiology, large amounts of patients' data are being measured, but these are distributed over local clinical databases and are heterogeneous with respect to the applied assessment tools. For the purpose of integrating across different databases, the Common Audiological Functional Parameters (CAFPAs) were recently established as abstract representations of the contained audiological information describing relevant functional aspects of the human auditory system. As an intermediate layer in a clinical decision-support system for audiology, the CAFPAs aim at maintaining interpretability to the potential users. Thus far, the CAFPAs were derived by experts from audiological measures. For designing a clinical decision-support system, in a next step the CAFPAs need to be automatically derived from available data of individual patients. Therefore, the present study aims at predicting the expert generated CAFPA labels using three different machine learning models, namely the lasso regression, elastic nets, and random forests. Furthermore, the importance of different audiological measures for the prediction of specific CAFPAs is examined and interpreted. The trained models are then used to predict CAFPAs for unlabeled data not seen by experts. Prediction of unlabeled cases is evaluated by means of model-based clustering methods. Results indicate an adequate prediction of the ten distinct CAFPAs. All models perform comparably and turn out to be suitable choices for the prediction of CAFPAs. They also generalize well to unlabeled data. Additionally, the extracted relevant features are plausible for the respective CAFPAs, facilitating interpretability of the predictions. Based on the trained models, a prototype of a clinical decision-support system in audiology can be implemented and extended towards clinical databases in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34713064
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2020.596433
pmc: PMC8521966
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
596433Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Saak, Hildebrandt, Kollmeier and Buhl.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Apr 18;6(2):e24
pubmed: 29669706
JAMA. 2018 Apr 3;319(13):1317-1318
pubmed: 29532063
Artif Intell Med. 1997 Feb;9(2):107-38
pubmed: 9040894
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Apr;136(4 Suppl):S21-6
pubmed: 17398337
Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):775-80
pubmed: 12915363
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016 Jun;36(3):155-66
pubmed: 27214827
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Oct;112(4):1597-604
pubmed: 12398465
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Mar;20(1):40-9
pubmed: 21499542
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Feb 1;144(2):115-126
pubmed: 29222544
Int J Audiol. 2019 Apr;58(4):231-245
pubmed: 30900518
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Feb;19(2):136-43
pubmed: 14758579
J Prof Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;30(5):399-405
pubmed: 25223288
Ann Palliat Med. 2016 Apr;5(2):83-92
pubmed: 27121736
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):918-926
pubmed: 30358656
Trends Neurosci. 2007 Feb;30(2):70-8
pubmed: 17188761
Stat Methods Med Res. 2007 Jun;16(3):277-98
pubmed: 17621472
J Headache Pain. 2014 Jun 16;15:40
pubmed: 24934331
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2491-3
pubmed: 26397948
Int J Audiol. 2021 Jan;60(1):16-26
pubmed: 32945703
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Oct;102(4):2412-21
pubmed: 9348699
Int J Audiol. 2020 Jul;59(7):534-547
pubmed: 32091289
Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Feb 21;8:26
pubmed: 24600357
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518807400
pubmed: 30384803
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Feb;27(2):280-6
pubmed: 9515637
Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36(6):e326-35
pubmed: 26258575
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Dec;58(6):1238-45
pubmed: 16998208
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:219
pubmed: 28270784
Bioinformatics. 2001 Oct;17(10):977-87
pubmed: 11673243
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:852-6
pubmed: 11187675
Hear Res. 2014 Oct;316:16-27
pubmed: 25058812