Causal roles of prefrontal cortex during spontaneous perceptual switching are determined by brain state dynamics.


Journal

eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 10 2021
Historique:
received: 03 04 2021
accepted: 28 10 2021
pubmed: 30 10 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
entrez: 29 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to orchestrate cognitive dynamics. However, in tests of bistable visual perception, no direct evidence supporting such presumable causal roles of the PFC has been reported except for a recent work. Here, using a novel brain-state-dependent neural stimulation system, we identified causal effects on percept dynamics in three PFC activities-right frontal eye fields, dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC), and inferior frontal cortex (IFC). The causality is behaviourally detectable only when we track brain state dynamics and modulate the PFC activity in brain-state-/state-history-dependent manners. The behavioural effects are underpinned by transient neural changes in the brain state dynamics, and such neural effects are quantitatively explainable by structural transformations of the hypothetical energy landscapes. Moreover, these findings indicate distinct functions of the three PFC areas: in particular, the DLPFC enhances the integration of two PFC-active brain states, whereas IFC promotes the functional segregation between them. This work resolves the controversy over the PFC roles in spontaneous perceptual switching and underlines brain state dynamics in fine investigations of brain-behaviour causality. A cube that seems to shift its spatial arrangement as you keep looking; the elegant silhouette of a pirouetting dancer, which starts to spin in the opposite direction the more you stare at it; an illustration that shows two profiles – or is it a vase? These optical illusions are examples of bistable visual perception. Beyond their entertaining aspect, they provide a way for scientists to explore the dynamics of human consciousness, and the neural regions involved in this process. Some studies show that bistable visual perception is associated with the activation of the prefrontal cortex, a brain area involved in complex cognitive processes. However, it is unclear whether this region is required for the illusions to emerge. Some research has showed that even if sections of the prefrontal cortex are temporally deactivated, participants can still experience the illusions. Instead, Takamitsu Watanabe proposes that bistable visual perception is a process tied to dynamic brain states – that is, that distinct regions of the prefontal cortex are required for this fluctuating visual awareness, depending on the state of the whole brain. Such causal link cannot be observed if brain activity is not tracked closely. To investigate this, the brain states of 65 participants were recorded as individuals were experiencing the optical illusions; the activity of their various brain regions could therefore be mapped, and then areas of the prefrontal cortex could precisely be inhibited at the right time using transcranial magnetic stimulation. This revealed that, indeed, prefrontal cortex regions were necessary for bistable visual perception, but not in a simple way. Instead, which ones were required and when depended on activity dynamics taking place in the whole brain. Overall, these results indicate that monitoring brain states is necessary to better understand – and ultimately, control – the neural pathways underlying perception and behaviour.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
A cube that seems to shift its spatial arrangement as you keep looking; the elegant silhouette of a pirouetting dancer, which starts to spin in the opposite direction the more you stare at it; an illustration that shows two profiles – or is it a vase? These optical illusions are examples of bistable visual perception. Beyond their entertaining aspect, they provide a way for scientists to explore the dynamics of human consciousness, and the neural regions involved in this process. Some studies show that bistable visual perception is associated with the activation of the prefrontal cortex, a brain area involved in complex cognitive processes. However, it is unclear whether this region is required for the illusions to emerge. Some research has showed that even if sections of the prefrontal cortex are temporally deactivated, participants can still experience the illusions. Instead, Takamitsu Watanabe proposes that bistable visual perception is a process tied to dynamic brain states – that is, that distinct regions of the prefontal cortex are required for this fluctuating visual awareness, depending on the state of the whole brain. Such causal link cannot be observed if brain activity is not tracked closely. To investigate this, the brain states of 65 participants were recorded as individuals were experiencing the optical illusions; the activity of their various brain regions could therefore be mapped, and then areas of the prefrontal cortex could precisely be inhibited at the right time using transcranial magnetic stimulation. This revealed that, indeed, prefrontal cortex regions were necessary for bistable visual perception, but not in a simple way. Instead, which ones were required and when depended on activity dynamics taking place in the whole brain. Overall, these results indicate that monitoring brain states is necessary to better understand – and ultimately, control – the neural pathways underlying perception and behaviour.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34713803
doi: 10.7554/eLife.69079
pii: 69079
pmc: PMC8631941
doi:
pii:

Banques de données

Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.8931zcrqn']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2021, Watanabe.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

TW No competing interests declared

Références

Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1970 Sep;29(3):306-10
pubmed: 4195653
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):257-71
pubmed: 19699307
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):7821-6
pubmed: 12060727
Vision Res. 2014 May;98:107-12
pubmed: 24718018
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):229-231
pubmed: 33462446
Front Neurosci. 2014 Aug 28;8:258
pubmed: 25221467
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Mar;60(3):753-62
pubmed: 21292589
J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):16009-15
pubmed: 24089505
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Dec 22;265(1413):2427-33
pubmed: 9921682
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Sep;20(9):2252-8
pubmed: 20051360
Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):908-16
pubmed: 11906231
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Feb;21(2):174-187
pubmed: 29311747
Elife. 2021 Oct 29;10:
pubmed: 34713803
Science. 2014 Apr 25;344(6182):424-7
pubmed: 24763592
Elife. 2014 Mar 25;3:e01867
pubmed: 24668169
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 May;35(5):1896-905
pubmed: 23897535
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2248-63
pubmed: 19874901
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 1;149:153-164
pubmed: 28159684
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005 Apr;71(4 Pt 2):046101
pubmed: 15903720
J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 17;30(7):2559-70
pubmed: 20164341
Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 28;20(18):R799-800
pubmed: 20869603
Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):163-78
pubmed: 10731767
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar - Apr;11(2):374-389
pubmed: 29191438
Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Aug;29(4):397-404
pubmed: 27224087
J Neurosci. 2018 Dec 5;38(49):10525-10534
pubmed: 30355634
Prog Neurobiol. 1997 Aug;52(5):427-45
pubmed: 9304700
Curr Biol. 2021 Jul 12;31(13):2868-2880.e8
pubmed: 33989530
Nature. 1996 Feb 8;379(6565):549-53
pubmed: 8596635
Curr Biol. 2000 Apr 6;10(7):383-92
pubmed: 10753744
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 24;9:589
pubmed: 29740374
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 01;9:2108
pubmed: 30443236
Nat Commun. 2017 Jul 05;8:16048
pubmed: 28677689
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 22;265(1411):2141-8
pubmed: 9872002
Mov Disord. 2010 Oct 30;25(14):2413-9
pubmed: 20818672
J Neurosci. 2019 Aug 14;39(33):6540-6554
pubmed: 31213484
Curr Biol. 2010 Dec 7;20(23):2106-11
pubmed: 21093263
Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):306-24
pubmed: 18466742
Curr Biol. 2011 Feb 8;21(3):R106-7
pubmed: 21300270
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039
pubmed: 19833552
Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):687-701
pubmed: 18649876
Elife. 2019 Feb 05;8:
pubmed: 30717827
Brain Stimul. 2019 Jan - Feb;12(1):110-118
pubmed: 30268710
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1669-73
pubmed: 9990082
Neuron. 2012 Jun 7;74(5):924-35
pubmed: 22681695
Science. 1998 Jun 19;280(5371):1930-4
pubmed: 9632390
Vision Res. 2012 May 1;60:34-9
pubmed: 22465540
Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):429-41
pubmed: 18466752
Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:78-88
pubmed: 25461709
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1738-47
pubmed: 24478356
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Dec;12(12):447-54
pubmed: 18951833
J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 13;31(28):10293-301
pubmed: 21753006
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):757-770
pubmed: 26585549
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3(11):1153-9
pubmed: 11036274
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;13(7):310-8
pubmed: 19540794
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:77-103
pubmed: 28854000
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Dec;95(6):475-7
pubmed: 8536576
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jun;39(6):2673-2688
pubmed: 29524289
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Nov;18(11):1672-8
pubmed: 26436901
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct;128(10):2070-2077
pubmed: 28778476
Curr Biol. 2006 May 9;16(9):907-11
pubmed: 16682352
Nat Commun. 2014 Aug 28;5:4765
pubmed: 25163855
Eur J Neurosci. 2021 Aug;54(4):5404-5416
pubmed: 34250639
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;24(3):167-168
pubmed: 31987718
Front Neuroinform. 2014 Feb 25;8:12
pubmed: 24611044
Curr Biol. 2017 May 8;27(9):1251-1258
pubmed: 28434860
Neuroimage. 2011 Aug 15;57(4):1411-21
pubmed: 21645624
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 May;60(5):455-63
pubmed: 2580697
J Vis. 2012 Jun 29;12(6):35
pubmed: 22753440
Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):496-9
pubmed: 16244649
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2728-34
pubmed: 19853046
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;116(1):172-89
pubmed: 15589196
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2017 Jun 28;375(2096):
pubmed: 28507232
Ann Neurol. 2019 Jan;85(1):84-95
pubmed: 30408227
Neurophysiol Clin. 2000 Feb;30(1):5-19
pubmed: 10740792
J Physiol. 2001 Mar 15;531(Pt 3):849-59
pubmed: 11251064
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;108(1):1-16
pubmed: 9474057
Nat Commun. 2013;4:1370
pubmed: 23340410
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 May 15;13(5):e1005536
pubmed: 28505152
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 27;110(35):E3350-9
pubmed: 23942129
Curr Biol. 2010 Sep 28;20(18):1626-30
pubmed: 20727757
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2672-82
pubmed: 17977788
Neuroimage. 2016 Oct 15;140:4-19
pubmed: 26883069
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):343-344
pubmed: 32298618
J Physiol. 2009 Oct 15;587(Pt 20):4845-62
pubmed: 19723779
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 15;180(Pt B):646-656
pubmed: 28669905
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Oct;21(10):2322-31
pubmed: 21385836
J Vis. 2004 Jul 01;4(7):539-51
pubmed: 15330700
J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 25;35(12):4813-23
pubmed: 25810512
Front Cell Neurosci. 2016 Apr 07;10:92
pubmed: 27092055
Neural Comput. 1999 Feb 15;11(2):417-41
pubmed: 9950738
Nature. 2009 Apr 2;458(7238):632-5
pubmed: 19225460
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2507
pubmed: 29410486
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Feb;22(2):263-77
pubmed: 19400676
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Jan;8(1):22-3
pubmed: 15580269

Auteurs

Takamitsu Watanabe (T)

International Research Centre for Neurointelligence, The University of Tokyo Institutes for Advanced Study, Tokyo, Japan.
RIKEN Centre for Brain Science, Saitama, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH