Predictors of long-term clinical response in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis receiving certolizumab pegol.
Axial spondyloarthritis
Certolizumab pegol
Predictors
TNF inhibitor
Journal
Arthritis research & therapy
ISSN: 1478-6362
Titre abrégé: Arthritis Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101154438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 10 2021
29 10 2021
Historique:
received:
14
06
2021
accepted:
12
10
2021
entrez:
30
10
2021
pubmed:
31
10
2021
medline:
9
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Identification of predictive clinical factors of long-term treatment response may contribute to improved management of non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) patients. This analysis aims to identify whether any baseline characteristics or Week 12 clinical outcomes in nr-axSpA patients with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enrolled in the C-axSpAnd study are predictive of achieving clinical response after 1 year of certolizumab pegol (CZP). C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) was a phase 3, multicentre study, including a 52-Week double-blind, placebo-controlled period. Enrolled patients were randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W or placebo. Predictors of Week 12 (CZP group only) and Week 52 clinical response were identified using a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Response variables included Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score major improvement (ASDAS-MI), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% response (ASAS40), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50% response (BASDAI50) and ASDAS inactive disease (ASDAS-ID). Predictive factors assessed included demographic and baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes at Week 12. A p-value <0.05 was required for forward selection into the model and p ≥0.1 for backward elimination. Missing data or values collected after switching to open-label treatment were accounted for using non-responder imputation. Sensitivity analyses accounted for patients with changes in non-biologic background medication. Of 317 enrolled patients, 159 and 158 were randomised to CZP and placebo, respectively. Younger age and male sex were identified as predictors of Week 12 response across all assessed efficacy outcomes in CZP-treated patients. Consistent predictors of Week 52 response, measured by ASDAS-MI, ASAS40 and BASDAI50, included human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 positivity and sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline. MRI positivity was also predictive of achieving ASDAS-ID at Week 52. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the primary analysis. In placebo-treated patients, no meaningful predictors of Week 52 response were identified. In this 52-Week, placebo-controlled study in nr-axSpA patients with elevated CRP and/or active sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline, MRI sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 positivity, but not elevated CRP or responses at Week 12, were predictive of long-term clinical response to CZP. Findings may support rheumatologists to identify patients suitable for TNFi treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02552212 . Registered on 15 September 2015.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Identification of predictive clinical factors of long-term treatment response may contribute to improved management of non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) patients. This analysis aims to identify whether any baseline characteristics or Week 12 clinical outcomes in nr-axSpA patients with elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enrolled in the C-axSpAnd study are predictive of achieving clinical response after 1 year of certolizumab pegol (CZP).
METHODS
C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) was a phase 3, multicentre study, including a 52-Week double-blind, placebo-controlled period. Enrolled patients were randomised to CZP 200 mg Q2W or placebo. Predictors of Week 12 (CZP group only) and Week 52 clinical response were identified using a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis. Response variables included Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score major improvement (ASDAS-MI), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society 40% response (ASAS40), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50% response (BASDAI50) and ASDAS inactive disease (ASDAS-ID). Predictive factors assessed included demographic and baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes at Week 12. A p-value <0.05 was required for forward selection into the model and p ≥0.1 for backward elimination. Missing data or values collected after switching to open-label treatment were accounted for using non-responder imputation. Sensitivity analyses accounted for patients with changes in non-biologic background medication.
RESULTS
Of 317 enrolled patients, 159 and 158 were randomised to CZP and placebo, respectively. Younger age and male sex were identified as predictors of Week 12 response across all assessed efficacy outcomes in CZP-treated patients. Consistent predictors of Week 52 response, measured by ASDAS-MI, ASAS40 and BASDAI50, included human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 positivity and sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline. MRI positivity was also predictive of achieving ASDAS-ID at Week 52. Sensitivity analyses were generally consistent with the primary analysis. In placebo-treated patients, no meaningful predictors of Week 52 response were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
In this 52-Week, placebo-controlled study in nr-axSpA patients with elevated CRP and/or active sacroiliitis on MRI at baseline, MRI sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 positivity, but not elevated CRP or responses at Week 12, were predictive of long-term clinical response to CZP. Findings may support rheumatologists to identify patients suitable for TNFi treatment.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02552212 . Registered on 15 September 2015.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34715908
doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02650-4
pii: 10.1186/s13075-021-02650-4
pmc: PMC8556993
doi:
Substances chimiques
Certolizumab Pegol
UMD07X179E
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02552212']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
274Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Rheumatol. 2009 Apr;36(4):801-8
pubmed: 19273449
Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 9;22(1):233
pubmed: 33036663
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Aug;66(8):2091-102
pubmed: 24891317
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Oct;67(10):2702-12
pubmed: 26139307
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Apr;52(4):1000-8
pubmed: 15818678
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Jun;63(6):665-70
pubmed: 15037444
RMD Open. 2015 Feb 18;1(1):e000017
pubmed: 26509050
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Jun 20;13(3):R94
pubmed: 21689401
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Sep;67(9):1276-81
pubmed: 18006539
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Jun;68(6):777-83
pubmed: 19297344
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 May;63(5):535-43
pubmed: 15082484
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018 Jun;14(6):525-533
pubmed: 29774755
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;71(7):1101-1111
pubmed: 30848558
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jul;74(7):1327-39
pubmed: 25837448
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):47-53
pubmed: 21068095
Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361-8
pubmed: 6231933
J Rheumatol. 2005 Sep;32(9):1751-4
pubmed: 16142873
RMD Open. 2019 Jun 7;5(1):e000917
pubmed: 31245052
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 1;59(Suppl4):iv6-iv17
pubmed: 33053191
Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Nov;69(11):2002-8
pubmed: 20511613
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Jul;66(7):1734-44
pubmed: 24623678
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):973-81
pubmed: 21402563
Ann Rheum Dis. 2009 Oct;68(10):1520-7
pubmed: 19454404
Clin Rheumatol. 2021 Aug;40(8):3161-3167
pubmed: 33611647
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1328-35
pubmed: 26269397
J Rheumatol. 2017 Jan;44(1):59-69
pubmed: 27909080
Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):815-22
pubmed: 22772328
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jun;76(6):978-991
pubmed: 28087505
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 May 12;20(6):35
pubmed: 29754330