Time trend analysis of social inequalities in psychological distress among young adults before and during the pandemic: evidence from the UK Household Longitudinal Study COVID-19 waves.
health inequalities
longitudinal studies
mental health
public health
social sciences
Journal
Journal of epidemiology and community health
ISSN: 1470-2738
Titre abrégé: J Epidemiol Community Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7909766
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Oct 2021
29 Oct 2021
Historique:
received:
24
05
2021
accepted:
13
10
2021
pubmed:
31
10
2021
medline:
31
10
2021
entrez:
30
10
2021
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Despite concerns about mental health problems among those aged 16-24 in England, which social groups have been most at risk, both over the past decade and during the COVID-19 pandemic, remains unclear. We examined trends in psychological distress among young adults 16-24 years old in England using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Using longitudinal data as repeated cross-sectional waves, we examined differences over time in mean General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) scores from wave 1 (2009-2010) to wave 10 (2018-2019) and six COVID-19 waves collected between April and November 2020, by economic activity, cohabitation with parents, parental education, area deprivation, ethnicity, age and sex. Compared with 2009-2010, increases in GHQ scores in 2018-2019 were higher in women than men (2.1 vs 1.3), those aged 16-18 than aged 22-24 (2.6 vs 0.9), those from white UK group versus other ethnic minorities, and those out of the labour force (3.6) or employed part time (2.2) than those employed full time (0.8). Compared with 2018-2019, psychological distress in 2020 also further increased among young adults residing in the most deprived areas (4.1 vs 1.2 in the least deprived areas). In 2020, losing one's job or most of one's work hours was associated with higher psychological distress and attenuated the differences between deprivation quartiles by 17%. In England, inequalities in psychological distress among young adults may have changed and increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investing in opportunities for young adults, particularly in more deprived areas, may be key to improve population levels of mental health.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite concerns about mental health problems among those aged 16-24 in England, which social groups have been most at risk, both over the past decade and during the COVID-19 pandemic, remains unclear.
METHODS
METHODS
We examined trends in psychological distress among young adults 16-24 years old in England using data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study. Using longitudinal data as repeated cross-sectional waves, we examined differences over time in mean General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) scores from wave 1 (2009-2010) to wave 10 (2018-2019) and six COVID-19 waves collected between April and November 2020, by economic activity, cohabitation with parents, parental education, area deprivation, ethnicity, age and sex.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Compared with 2009-2010, increases in GHQ scores in 2018-2019 were higher in women than men (2.1 vs 1.3), those aged 16-18 than aged 22-24 (2.6 vs 0.9), those from white UK group versus other ethnic minorities, and those out of the labour force (3.6) or employed part time (2.2) than those employed full time (0.8). Compared with 2018-2019, psychological distress in 2020 also further increased among young adults residing in the most deprived areas (4.1 vs 1.2 in the least deprived areas). In 2020, losing one's job or most of one's work hours was associated with higher psychological distress and attenuated the differences between deprivation quartiles by 17%.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In England, inequalities in psychological distress among young adults may have changed and increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Investing in opportunities for young adults, particularly in more deprived areas, may be key to improve population levels of mental health.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34716130
pii: jech-2021-217266
doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-217266
pmc: PMC8561821
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Fam Issues. 2017 Nov;38(16):2254-2276
pubmed: 29051680
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;218(3):158-164
pubmed: 32895062
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jul 25;8:258
pubmed: 18655701
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 May;56(5):879-882
pubmed: 33590312
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Mar;75(3):224-231
pubmed: 32978210
J Affect Disord. 2021 May 15;287:308-315
pubmed: 33812244
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;52(9):1147-1158
pubmed: 28698927
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Feb 8;:
pubmed: 33558430
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244419
pubmed: 33406085
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Oct;73(8):1133-44
pubmed: 21903318
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):e124-e135
pubmed: 33444560
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Jul 1;189(7):679-689
pubmed: 32239174
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;147:324-31
pubmed: 26623942
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Feb 24;13:100761
pubmed: 33732864
Lancet. 2012 Apr 28;379(9826):1641-52
pubmed: 22538179
Health Place. 2016 Nov;42:79-86
pubmed: 27744254
Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;49(8):1275-1285
pubmed: 30201061
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):610-619
pubmed: 33965057
Soc Sci Med. 1993 Jul;37(1):41-52
pubmed: 8332923
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247959
pubmed: 33662014
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2026064
pubmed: 33104209
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:99-106
pubmed: 29421477
Psychol Med. 2020 Nov 13;:1-10
pubmed: 33183370
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Sep;75(9):817-823
pubmed: 33483341
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892
pubmed: 32707037