Labour after caesarean counselling documentation: a quality improvement intervention on labour and delivery.


Journal

BMJ open quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open Qual
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101710381

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 2021
Historique:
received: 13 10 2020
accepted: 28 07 2021
entrez: 30 10 2021
pubmed: 31 10 2021
medline: 31 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Most women who have had previous caesareans are eligible to have labour after caesarean (LAC), but only 11.9% do so. Studies show the majority of women have already decided about future mode of birth (FMOB) before a subsequent pregnancy. Hence, providing women with LAC counselling soon after birth may help women plan for future pregnancies. Prior to our intervention, our hospital had no method of ensuring that women received LAC counselling after caesarean section. The purpose of this QI initiative was to assess whether formal LAC documentation on labour and delivery (L&D) improves rates of LAC counselling post partum. Our three-part intervention included: (1) surgeon's assessment of LAC feasibility in the operative note, (2) written LAC education for women in discharge paperwork and (3) documentation of LAC counselling in the discharge summary. We implemented these changes on L&D in January 2019. We conducted phone surveys of 40 women after caesarean preintervention and postintervention. Surveys included questions regarding three primary outcomes: whether or not they had received LAC counselling either in the hospital or at a postpartum visit, and whether or not they would pursue LAC as FMOB. Surveys also assessed two secondary outcomes: (1) women's understanding of the indications for surgery and (2) their involvement in the decision process. We used a χ After our intervention, there was a significant difference between the number of women reporting LAC postpartum counselling (30.77% vs 53.8%, p=0.04). There was also a significant difference in the number of women feeling involved in the decision-making process (68% vs 95%, p=0.03). Providers reported improved knowledge/confidence around LAC counselling (58%-100%). Providers universally stated that LAC counselling has become more ingrained in the culture on L&D. Documentation of LAC counselling improved the consistency with which providers incorporated LAC counselling into postpartum care. Addressing FMOB at the time of pLTCS and documenting that counselling may be an effective first step in empowering women to pursue LAC in future pregnancies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Most women who have had previous caesareans are eligible to have labour after caesarean (LAC), but only 11.9% do so. Studies show the majority of women have already decided about future mode of birth (FMOB) before a subsequent pregnancy. Hence, providing women with LAC counselling soon after birth may help women plan for future pregnancies. Prior to our intervention, our hospital had no method of ensuring that women received LAC counselling after caesarean section. The purpose of this QI initiative was to assess whether formal LAC documentation on labour and delivery (L&D) improves rates of LAC counselling post partum.
METHODS
Our three-part intervention included: (1) surgeon's assessment of LAC feasibility in the operative note, (2) written LAC education for women in discharge paperwork and (3) documentation of LAC counselling in the discharge summary. We implemented these changes on L&D in January 2019. We conducted phone surveys of 40 women after caesarean preintervention and postintervention. Surveys included questions regarding three primary outcomes: whether or not they had received LAC counselling either in the hospital or at a postpartum visit, and whether or not they would pursue LAC as FMOB. Surveys also assessed two secondary outcomes: (1) women's understanding of the indications for surgery and (2) their involvement in the decision process. We used a χ
RESULTS
After our intervention, there was a significant difference between the number of women reporting LAC postpartum counselling (30.77% vs 53.8%, p=0.04). There was also a significant difference in the number of women feeling involved in the decision-making process (68% vs 95%, p=0.03). Providers reported improved knowledge/confidence around LAC counselling (58%-100%). Providers universally stated that LAC counselling has become more ingrained in the culture on L&D.
CONCLUSIONS
Documentation of LAC counselling improved the consistency with which providers incorporated LAC counselling into postpartum care. Addressing FMOB at the time of pLTCS and documenting that counselling may be an effective first step in empowering women to pursue LAC in future pregnancies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34716182
pii: bmjoq-2020-001232
doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001232
pmc: PMC8559118
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;207(3):204.e1-6
pubmed: 22939727
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 05;15:16
pubmed: 25652550
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 30;(7):CD010041
pubmed: 23897547
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Feb;176(2):419-25
pubmed: 9065192
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 08;6(1):e008881
pubmed: 26747030
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;206(4):311.e1-9
pubmed: 22464069
Midwifery. 2015 Jul;31(7):657-63
pubmed: 25931275
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15;(6):CD005528
pubmed: 21678348
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):367
pubmed: 32552758
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(2):183-92
pubmed: 24251861
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Nov;68(13):1-47
pubmed: 32501202
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):e217-e233
pubmed: 29064970

Auteurs

Elena Hill (E)

Department of Family Medicine, Department of OBGYN, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA ehill3047@gmail.com.

Somphit Chinkam (S)

Department of Family Medicine, Department of OBGYN, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Lilia Cardenas (L)

Department of Family Medicine, Department of OBGYN, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Ronald Edward Iverson (RE)

Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH