Cervical cancer screening status and implementation challenges: Report from selected states of India.


Journal

The International journal of health planning and management
ISSN: 1099-1751
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Plann Manage
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8605825

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Historique:
revised: 28 07 2021
received: 31 10 2020
accepted: 04 10 2021
pubmed: 31 10 2021
medline: 12 3 2022
entrez: 30 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cervical cancer contributes to 6%-29% of the cancers in India. Although the Government of India in 2010 integrated cancer screening within the National Programme for the prevention of Non-communicable Diseases, only 22% of women aged 15-45 years had undergone examination of the cervix by 2016. This prompts the question regarding the organisation of the program's implementation and service delivery and regarding challenges that may explain poor screening uptake. Semi-structured interviews were held with program managers and implementers in seven districts of three selected States of India. The data analysis looked at program content, the organisation of screening delivery, and the challenges to the implementation of the program, considering six theoretically derived dimensions of public health capacity: leadership and governance, organisational structure, financial resources, workforce, partnerships, and knowledge development. Participants perceive the existing capacities across the six domains as insufficient to implement the CCS program nationwide. A context specific implementation, a better coordination between the program and district health facilities, timely remuneration, better maintenance of data and a strong monitoring system are possible solutions to remove health system related barriers. The study provides evidence on the practical challenges and provides recommendations for strengthening the capacities of the health system.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cervical cancer contributes to 6%-29% of the cancers in India. Although the Government of India in 2010 integrated cancer screening within the National Programme for the prevention of Non-communicable Diseases, only 22% of women aged 15-45 years had undergone examination of the cervix by 2016. This prompts the question regarding the organisation of the program's implementation and service delivery and regarding challenges that may explain poor screening uptake.
METHODS METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were held with program managers and implementers in seven districts of three selected States of India. The data analysis looked at program content, the organisation of screening delivery, and the challenges to the implementation of the program, considering six theoretically derived dimensions of public health capacity: leadership and governance, organisational structure, financial resources, workforce, partnerships, and knowledge development.
RESULTS RESULTS
Participants perceive the existing capacities across the six domains as insufficient to implement the CCS program nationwide. A context specific implementation, a better coordination between the program and district health facilities, timely remuneration, better maintenance of data and a strong monitoring system are possible solutions to remove health system related barriers.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The study provides evidence on the practical challenges and provides recommendations for strengthening the capacities of the health system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34716616
doi: 10.1002/hpm.3353
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

824-838

Subventions

Organisme : Co-operation au Development

Informations de copyright

© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

American Cancer Society. Global Cancer Facts and Figures. Am Cancer Soc. 2015;800:1-64.
Konno R, Sagae S, Yoshikawa H, et al. Cervical cancer working group report. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010;40(suppl_1):i44-i50.
Oyervides-Muñoz MA, Pérez-Maya AA, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez HF, et al. Understanding the HPV integration and its progression to cervical cancer. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;61:134-144.
Murthy NS, Nandakumar B, Pruthvish S, George PS, Mathew A. Disability adjusted life years for cancer patients in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11(3):633-640.
Dhillon PK, Mathur P, Nandakumar A, et al. The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(10):1289-1306.
Nigam A, Saxena P, Acharya AS, Mishra A, Batra S. HPV vaccination in India: critical appraisal. Int Schol Res Not. 2014;2014. https://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/2014/394595.pdf
World Health Organization, Zdrowia ŚO, Control PoC, Health WHOR. Cervical Cancer Screening in Developing Countries: Report of a WHO Consultation. World Health Organization; 2002.
Sankaranarayanan R, Basu P, Wesley RS, et al. Accuracy of visual screening for cervical neoplasia: results from an IARC multicentre study in India and Africa. Int J Cancer. 2004;110(6):907-913.
Sharma A, Kulkarni V, Bhaskaran U, et al. Profile of cervical cancer patients attending Tertiary Care Hospitals of Mangalore, Karnataka: a 4 year retrospective study. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2017;8(1):125.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, GOI. Operational Framework: Management of Common Cancers; 2016.
Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, et al. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1385-1394.
Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, et al. Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2007;370(9585):398-406.
Mittra I, Mishra GA, Singh S, et al. A cluster randomized, controlled trial of breast and cervix cancer screening in Mumbai, India: methodology and interim results after three rounds of screening. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(4):976-984.
Nene B, Jayant K, Arrossi S, et al. Determinants of women's participation in cervical cancer screening trial, Maharashtra, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:264-272.
Aitken M, Backliwal A, Chang M, Udeshi A. Understanding Healthcare Access in India. What is the Current State. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. 2013;11.
IIPS MD, Macro O. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2), 1998-1999: India. International Institute of Population Sciences, Mumbai; 2000.
Rao KD, Bhatnagar A, Berman P. So many, yet few: human resources for health in India. Hum Resour Health. 2012;10(1):19.
Mohanan M, Hay K, Mor N. Quality of health care in India: challenges, priorities, and the road ahead. Health Aff. 2016;35(10):1753-1758.
Penchansky R, Thomas JW. The concept of access: definition and relationship to consumer satisfaction. Med Care. 1981;19:127-140.
Peters DH, Tran NT, Adam T. Implementation Research in Health: A Practical Guide. World Health Organization; 2013.
Aluttis C, Maier CB, Van den Broucke S, Czabanowska K. Developing the public health workforce. Facets Public Health Eur. 2014:255-266. https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/developing-the-public-health-workforce
Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288.
Lincoln Y, Inquiry GN. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Sage; 1985.
Dsouza JP, Van den Broucke S, Pattanshetty S, Dhoore W. Exploring the barriers to cervical cancer screening through the lens of implementers and beneficiaries of the national screening program: a multi-contextual study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(8):2209-2215.
Khozaim K, Orang'o E, Christoffersen-Deb A, et al. Successes and challenges of establishing a cervical cancer screening and treatment program in western Kenya. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;124(1):12-18.
Mustafa A, Shekhar C. Is quality and availability of facilities at Primary Health Centers (PHCs) associated with healthcare-seeking from PHCs in rural India: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;9:293-298.
Adsul P, Manjunath N, Srinivas V, Arun A, Madhivanan P. Implementing community-based cervical cancer screening programs using visual inspection with acetic acid in India: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol 2017;49:161-174.
Sharma P, Rahi M, Lal P. A community-based cervical cancer screening program among women of Delhi using camp approach. Indian J Community Med. 2010;35(1):86.
Quinley KE, Gormley RH, Ratcliffe SJ, et al. Use of mobile telemedicine for cervical cancer screening. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(4):203-209.
World Health Organization. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: A Guide to Essential Practice. World Health Organization; 2006.
Lewis S, Moucheraud C, Schechinger D, et al. ‘A loving man has a very huge responsibility’: a mixed methods study of Malawian men’s knowledge and beliefs about cervical cancer. BMC Publ Health. 2020;20(1):1-12.
O'Donovan J, O’Donovan C, Nagraj S. The role of community health workers in cervical cancer screening in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review of the literature. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(3):e001452.
Mishra SI, Luce PH, Baquet CR. Increasing Pap smear utilization among Samoan Women: results from a community based participatory randomized trial. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2009;20(2 Suppl):85.
Milstein B, Wetterhall SF. Framework for program evaluation in public Health; 1999.
Improving Screening Coverage Rates of Cervical Cancer Prevention Programs. A Focus on Communities; 2004.
Maseko FC, Chirwa ML, Muula AS. Health systems challenges in cervical cancer prevention program in Malawi. Glob Health Action. 2015;8(1):26282.
Binka C, Nyarko SH, Awusabo-Asare K, Doku DT. Barriers to the uptake of cervical cancer screening and treatment among rural women in Ghana. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2019/6320938/
World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance. World Health Organization; 2000.
Panda R, Mahapatra S, Persai D. Health system preparedness in noncommunicable diseases: findings from two states Odisha and Kerala in India. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2018;7(3):565.
Singh C, Jain P, Nair K, Kumar P, Dhar N, Nandan D. Assessment of utilization of untied fund provided under the national rural health mission in Uttar Pradesh. Indian J Publ Health. 2009;53(3):137-142.
Satpathy S. Indian public health standards (IPHS) for community health centres. Indian J Publ Health. 2005;49(3):123-126.
Rao KD. Situation analysis of the health workforce in India. Human Resources Background Paper. 2014;1.
Purohit B, Martineau T. Issues and challenges in recruitment for government doctors in Gujarat, India. Hum Resour Health. 2016;14(1):1-14.
Ojakaa D, Olango S, Jarvis J. Factors affecting motivation and retention of primary health care workers in three disparate regions in Kenya. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12(1):1-13.
Gajalakshmi CK, Krishnamurthi S, Ananth R, Shanta V. Cervical cancer screening in Tamil Nadu, India: a feasibility study of training the village health nurse. Cancer Causes Control. 1996;7(5):520-524.
Nandan D, Agarwal D. Human resources for health in India: urgent need for reforms. Indian J Community Med. 2012;37(4):205.
De Vuyst H, Alemany L, Lacey C, et al. The burden of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases in sub-saharan Africa. Vaccine. 2013;31:F32-F46.
Binagwaho A, Ngabo F, Wagner CM, et al. Integration of comprehensive women's health programmes into health systems: cervical cancer prevention, care and control in Rwanda. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91:697-703.
Nakisige C, Schwartz M, Ndira AO. Cervical cancer screening and treatment in Uganda. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017;20:37-40.
Juma PA, Mapa-Tassou C, Mohamed SF, et al. Multi-sectoral action in non-communicable disease prevention policy development in five African countries. BMC Publ Health. 2018;18(1):1-11.
Abu SH, Woldehanna BT, Nida ET, Tilahun AW, Gebremariam MY, Sisay MM. The role of health education on cervical cancer screening uptake at selected health centers in Addis Ababa. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(10):e0239580.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005.
Pomrehn PR, Davis MV, Chen D, Barker W. Prevention for the 21st century: setting the context through undergraduate medical education. Acad Med. 2000;75(7):S5-S13.
World Health Organization, Staff WHO, Zdrowia ŚO. World Report on Knowledge for Better Health: Strengthening Health Systems. World Health Organization; 2004.

Auteurs

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza (JP)

Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), School of Public Health, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Stephan Van den Broucke (S)

Psychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Sanjay Pattanshetty (S)

School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal University, Manipal, India.

William Dhoore (W)

School of Public Health, Université Catholique de Louvain, Woluwe, Brussels, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH