Effects of Provision Type and Pesticide Exposure on the Larval Development of Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).

lethal dose pollination risk assessment solitary bee sublethal effect

Journal

Environmental entomology
ISSN: 1938-2936
Titre abrégé: Environ Entomol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7502320

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 02 2022
Historique:
received: 18 02 2021
pubmed: 1 11 2021
medline: 5 4 2022
entrez: 31 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Wild and managed bee populations are in decline, and one of many environmental causes is the impact of pesticides on developing bees. For solitary bees, delayed larval development could lead to asynchronous adult emergence, unhealthy and inefficient adult pollinators, and decreased brood production and survival. We examined a methodology for testing Osmia lignaria Say (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) larval responses to pesticide exposure using a laboratory bioassay. We created two provision types: a homogenized blend of O. lignaria provisions from an apple orchard and homogenized almond pollen pellets collected by honey bees plus sugar water. Pesticides were administered to the provisions to compare toxic effects. We recorded larval developmental durations for second-fifth instar and for fifth instar to cocoon initiation for larvae fed provisions treated with water (control) or doses of three pesticides and a representative spray-tank mixture (acetamiprid, boscalid/pyraclostrobin, dimethoate, and acetamiprid plus boscalid/pyraclostrobin). All larvae survived to cocoon initiation when only water was added to provisions. Impacts of pesticide treatments significantly differed between the apple and almond homogenates. The greatest treatment effects occurred when the homogenized almond provision was mixed with acetamiprid alone and when combined with boscalid/pyraclostrobin. Optimizing bioassays through the use of appropriate larval food for exposing solitary bee larvae to agrochemicals is crucial for assessing risks for pollinators.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34718488
pii: 6413888
doi: 10.1093/ee/nvab119
doi:

Substances chimiques

Pesticides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

240-251

Informations de copyright

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America 2021.

Auteurs

Andi M Kopit (AM)

Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

Ellen Klinger (E)

USDA ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA.
Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Diana L Cox-Foster (DL)

USDA ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA.

Ricardo A Ramirez (RA)

Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

Theresa L Pitts-Singer (TL)

USDA ARS Pollinating Insects Research Unit, Logan, UT, USA.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH