Radiation dose to nurses, cardiologists, and patients during coronary angiography: a comparison of femoral and radial access.

Angiography Dose optimization Fluoroscopy Ionizing radiation Occupational exposure Radiation Scout nurse Scrub nurse

Journal

European journal of cardiovascular nursing
ISSN: 1873-1953
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101128793

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 06 2022
Historique:
received: 20 05 2021
revised: 26 08 2021
accepted: 03 10 2021
pubmed: 1 11 2021
medline: 7 6 2022
entrez: 31 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Exposure to radiation during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures is a cause for concern for both the patient and staff. This study sought to compare the occupational and patient radiation dose during femoral and radially accessed invasive coronary angiography (CA). Occupational dose (µSv) was measured at the left temple of the cardiologist (n = 17), scrub (n = 27), and circulator nurse (n = 27) during 761 femoral and 671 radially accessed diagnostic coronary angiograms and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Patient dose parameters of dose area product (DAP) (Gy.cm2) and air kerma (AK) (Gy) were also measured. Coronary angiography performed via the radial artery is associated with greater mean dose to the cardiologist, with the exception of procedures including only PCI. Results demonstrated that scrub nurses are exposed to higher mean doses than the cardiologist when using femoral access and similar doses during radial cases. Both AK and DAP were associated with a higher average dose for femoral PCI than radial, with DAP being significantly higher. Awareness of factors that increase the dose to staff and patients is vital to inform and improve practice. This study has demonstrated that access route during diagnostic CA and PCI influences both patient and staff dose. Radiation dose to in-room staff other than the fluoroscopic operator should be a focus of future research. In addition, all staff present during X-ray guided procedures should be provided with radiation education and adopt dose minimization strategies to reduce occupational exposures.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Exposure to radiation during fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures is a cause for concern for both the patient and staff.
AIMS
This study sought to compare the occupational and patient radiation dose during femoral and radially accessed invasive coronary angiography (CA).
METHODS AND RESULTS
Occupational dose (µSv) was measured at the left temple of the cardiologist (n = 17), scrub (n = 27), and circulator nurse (n = 27) during 761 femoral and 671 radially accessed diagnostic coronary angiograms and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures. Patient dose parameters of dose area product (DAP) (Gy.cm2) and air kerma (AK) (Gy) were also measured. Coronary angiography performed via the radial artery is associated with greater mean dose to the cardiologist, with the exception of procedures including only PCI. Results demonstrated that scrub nurses are exposed to higher mean doses than the cardiologist when using femoral access and similar doses during radial cases. Both AK and DAP were associated with a higher average dose for femoral PCI than radial, with DAP being significantly higher.
CONCLUSIONS
Awareness of factors that increase the dose to staff and patients is vital to inform and improve practice. This study has demonstrated that access route during diagnostic CA and PCI influences both patient and staff dose. Radiation dose to in-room staff other than the fluoroscopic operator should be a focus of future research. In addition, all staff present during X-ray guided procedures should be provided with radiation education and adopt dose minimization strategies to reduce occupational exposures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34718509
pii: 6410781
doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab096
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

325-331

Informations de copyright

Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Kelly S Wilson-Stewart (KS)

School of Chemistry and Physics, Faulty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
Greenslopes Private Hospital, Ramsay Health Care, Newdegate Street, Greenslopes, Brisbane, QLD 4120 Australia.

Davide Fontanarosa (D)

School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
Centre for Biomedical Technologies (CBT), Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.

Eva Malacova (E)

School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.
QMIR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 200 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006 Australia.

Jamie V Trapp (JV)

School of Chemistry and Physics, Faulty of Science and Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH