Deep learning


Journal

World journal of gastroenterology
ISSN: 2219-2840
Titre abrégé: World J Gastroenterol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100883448

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 05 03 2021
revised: 26 04 2021
accepted: 06 09 2021
entrez: 1 11 2021
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Traditional methods of developing predictive models in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) rely on using statistical regression approaches to deriving clinical scores such as the Crohn's disease (CD) activity index. However, traditional approaches are unable to take advantage of more complex data structures such as repeated measurements. Deep learning methods have the potential ability to automatically find and learn complex, hidden relationships between predictive markers and outcomes, but their application to clinical prediction in CD and IBD has not been explored previously. To determine and compare the utility of deep learning with conventional algorithms in predicting response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in CD. This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of all CD patients who commenced anti-TNF therapy (either adalimumab or infliximab) from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015. Remission was defined as a C-reactive protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L at 12 mo after anti-TNF commencement. Three supervised learning algorithms were compared: (1) A conventional statistical learning algorithm using multivariable logistic regression on baseline data only; (2) A deep learning algorithm using a feed-forward artificial neural network on baseline data only; and (3) A deep learning algorithm using a recurrent neural network on repeated data. Predictive performance was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) after 10× repeated 5-fold cross-validation. A total of 146 patients were included (median age 36 years, 48% male). Concomitant therapy at anti-TNF commencement included thiopurines (68%), methotrexate (18%), corticosteroids (44%) and aminosalicylates (33%). After 12 mo, 64% had CRP < 5 mg/L. The conventional learning algorithm selected the following baseline variables for the predictive model: Complex disease behavior, albumin, monocytes, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and gamma-glutamyl transferase, and had a cross-validated AUC of 0.659, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.562-0.756. A feed-forward artificial neural network using only baseline data demonstrated an AUC of 0.710 (95%CI: 0.622-0.799; Deep learning methods are feasible and have the potential for stronger predictive performance compared to conventional model building methods when applied to predicting remission after anti-TNF therapy in CD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Traditional methods of developing predictive models in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) rely on using statistical regression approaches to deriving clinical scores such as the Crohn's disease (CD) activity index. However, traditional approaches are unable to take advantage of more complex data structures such as repeated measurements. Deep learning methods have the potential ability to automatically find and learn complex, hidden relationships between predictive markers and outcomes, but their application to clinical prediction in CD and IBD has not been explored previously.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To determine and compare the utility of deep learning with conventional algorithms in predicting response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy in CD.
METHODS METHODS
This was a retrospective single-center cohort study of all CD patients who commenced anti-TNF therapy (either adalimumab or infliximab) from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2015. Remission was defined as a C-reactive protein (CRP) < 5 mg/L at 12 mo after anti-TNF commencement. Three supervised learning algorithms were compared: (1) A conventional statistical learning algorithm using multivariable logistic regression on baseline data only; (2) A deep learning algorithm using a feed-forward artificial neural network on baseline data only; and (3) A deep learning algorithm using a recurrent neural network on repeated data. Predictive performance was assessed using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) after 10× repeated 5-fold cross-validation.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 146 patients were included (median age 36 years, 48% male). Concomitant therapy at anti-TNF commencement included thiopurines (68%), methotrexate (18%), corticosteroids (44%) and aminosalicylates (33%). After 12 mo, 64% had CRP < 5 mg/L. The conventional learning algorithm selected the following baseline variables for the predictive model: Complex disease behavior, albumin, monocytes, lymphocytes, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and gamma-glutamyl transferase, and had a cross-validated AUC of 0.659, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.562-0.756. A feed-forward artificial neural network using only baseline data demonstrated an AUC of 0.710 (95%CI: 0.622-0.799;
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Deep learning methods are feasible and have the potential for stronger predictive performance compared to conventional model building methods when applied to predicting remission after anti-TNF therapy in CD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34720536
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6476
pmc: PMC8517788
doi:

Substances chimiques

Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors 0
Infliximab B72HH48FLU
Adalimumab FYS6T7F842

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6476-6488

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: Con D has no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. AV has received financial support to attend educational meetings from Ferring. van Langenberg DR has served as a speaker and/or received travel support from Takeda, Ferring and Shire. He has consultancy agreements with Abbvie, Janssen and Pfizer. He received research funding grants for investigator-driven studies from Ferring, Shire and AbbVie.

Références

Gastroenterology. 1976 Mar;70(3):439-44
pubmed: 1248701
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Oct;60(4):505-12
pubmed: 15472670
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 20;10(1):20299
pubmed: 33219239
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204
pubmed: 24582925
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Dec 14;26(46):7287-7298
pubmed: 33362384
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193721
pubmed: 31074823
Intern Med J. 2018 Oct;48(10):1234-1241
pubmed: 29663629
Lancet. 2017 Apr 29;389(10080):1741-1755
pubmed: 27914655
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):76-94.e2
pubmed: 31593701
Intest Res. 2021 Jan;19(1):21-32
pubmed: 32311862
Endoscopy. 2020 Sep;52(9):786-791
pubmed: 32557474
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;36(6):1590-1597
pubmed: 33105045
J Crohns Colitis. 2021 Apr 6;15(4):583-593
pubmed: 32949458
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 Feb;11(2):e00135
pubmed: 32463625
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jan 29;7:8
pubmed: 32064265
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2150-2157
pubmed: 32060000
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;36(2):376-382
pubmed: 33141979
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015 Oct;21(10):2254-61
pubmed: 26197446
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;52(9):973-980
pubmed: 28598210
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;111(12):1816-1822
pubmed: 27596696
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 22;14(11):e0225382
pubmed: 31756219
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Nov;46(9):883-891
pubmed: 28881017
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;36(1):31-38
pubmed: 33140875
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Dec 19;24(1):45-53
pubmed: 29272474
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0142481
pubmed: 27099937
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Apr;13(4):319-330
pubmed: 30791776
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug;52(8):851-856
pubmed: 28509590
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Feb 1;13(2):144-164
pubmed: 30137275
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 May 16;25(Suppl 2):S31-S39
pubmed: 31095701
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 07;10:963
pubmed: 31803221
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204632
pubmed: 30286108
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;36(1):131-136
pubmed: 32511793
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Dec;71(12):1987-1996
pubmed: 31342661
Med J Aust. 2020 Sep;213(6):253-255.e1
pubmed: 32892395
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;55(1):59-66
pubmed: 32301833
J Crohns Colitis. 2020 Sep 16;14(9):1231-1240
pubmed: 32157278
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 8;347(6):417-29
pubmed: 12167685
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):606-613.e2
pubmed: 31743689
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 28;26(44):6923-6928
pubmed: 33311940
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;35(10):1663-1664
pubmed: 33043510
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Jul;46(2):150-161
pubmed: 28481014
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2020 Sep 18;26(10):1498-1508
pubmed: 32840322

Auteurs

Danny Con (D)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia. dannycon302@gmail.com.

Daniel R van Langenberg (DR)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.

Abhinav Vasudevan (A)

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eastern Health, Box Hill 3128, Victoria, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH