A New Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes of Operated Proximal Metadiaphyseal Humeral Fractures and Nonunions With the Use of Reversed Anatomic Distal Femoral Locking Plate.
deltopectoral approach
locking plate
metadiaphyseal humeral fractures
nonunion
proximal humerus fracture
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
accepted:
26
09
2021
entrez:
1
11
2021
pubmed:
2
11
2021
medline:
2
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Proximal humeral fractures complicated with metaphyseal and diaphyseal extension are usually treated operatively with 3.5 mm long anatomic proximal humerus plates. However, frequently these comminuted and segmental fracture types may be associated with delayed union, nonunion, and/or plate failure. We present a technique for addressing this fracture pattern by using an anatomic contralateral 4.5 mm distal femoral plate in a reversed fashion. Methods Eleven patients (eight women and three men) with a mean age of 70 years (range, 52 to 84 years) were operated on with the described technique. The dominant hand was involved in seven out of 11 patients. There were seven acute metadiaphyseal fractures and four nonunions. In one patient, humeral shaft nonunion was associated with segmental metadiaphyseal defect and a free fibular graft was applied. Results All fractures healed and patients regained almost normal function of the affected shoulder and upper limb. Shoulder abduction and forward elevation ranged from 80 to 110 degrees (mean, 97 degrees) and 90 to 120 degrees (mean, 102 degrees), respectively. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score varied from 6 to 11 points (median 8). No major trauma or systemic complications were recorded. Conclusion The morphology, strength, and characteristics of the plate could effectively conform to the anatomy of the proximal humerus and offer adequate stability for fracture union. The described technique is more useful in case of osteoporosis and/or presence of previous failed internal fixation that further compromise the vascularization and the mechanical properties of the bone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34722081
doi: 10.7759/cureus.18309
pmc: PMC8548934
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e18309Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021, Chalidis et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(1):1-6
pubmed: 20513984
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(2):153-157
pubmed: 33960929
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Mar;28(3):e56-64
pubmed: 24561540
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Mar;72(3):783-92
pubmed: 22491570
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Apr;19(3):446-51
pubmed: 19800259
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Sep;21(9):538-47
pubmed: 23996985
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jan 15;89(4):532-539
pubmed: 30657122
Injury. 2014 Feb;45(2):444-7
pubmed: 24183393
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Dec;24(8):1383-7
pubmed: 24085655
Orthopedics. 2014 Mar;37(3):e237-43
pubmed: 24762150
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2011 Jan;21(1):7-12
pubmed: 21837232
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8
pubmed: 8773720
Injury. 2015 Dec;46(12):2379-83
pubmed: 26521994
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Aug 17;20(1):381
pubmed: 31421675
Clin Interv Aging. 2018 May 22;13:1003-1010
pubmed: 29861628
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Nov;26(11):1881-1888
pubmed: 29054684
Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Jan;7(1):18-23
pubmed: 27582952