Proton Therapy of Prostate and Pelvic Lymph Nodes for High Risk Prostate Cancer: Acute Toxicity.

acute toxicity hypofractionation prostate cancer proton therapy

Journal

International journal of particle therapy
ISSN: 2331-5180
Titre abrégé: Int J Part Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674108

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 10 12 2020
accepted: 02 03 2021
entrez: 1 11 2021
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 2 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To assess acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) targeting the prostate/seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes for prostate cancer. A prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02874014), evaluating moderately hypofractionated IMPT for high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer, accrued a target sample size of 56 patients. The prostate/seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes were treated simultaneously with 6750 and 4500 centigray radiobiologic equivalent (cGyRBE), respectively, in 25 daily fractions. All received androgen-deprivation therapy. Acute GI and GU toxicities were prospectively assessed from 7 GI and 9 GU categories of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4), at baseline, weekly during radiotherapy, and 3-month after radiotherapy. Fisher exact tests were used for comparisons of categorical data. Median age was 75 years. Median follow-up was 25 months. Fifty-five patients were available for acute toxicity assessment. Sixty-two percent and 2%, respectively, experienced acute grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity. Grade 2 GI toxicity was proctitis. Sixty-five percent and 35%, respectively, had acute grade 1 and 2 GU toxicity. The 3 most frequent grade 2 GU toxicities were urinary frequency, urgency, and obstructive symptoms. None had acute grade ≥ 3 GI or GU toxicity. The presence of baseline GI and GU symptoms was associated with a greater likelihood of experiencing acute GI and GU toxicity, respectively. Of 45 patients with baseline GU symptoms, 44% experienced acute grade 2 GU toxicity, compared with only 10% among 10 with no baseline GU symptoms ( A moderately hypofractionated IMPT targeting the prostate/seminal vesicles and regional pelvic lymph nodes was well tolerated with no acute grade ≥ 3 GI or GU toxicity. Patients with baseline GU symptoms had a higher rate of acute grade 2 GU toxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34722810
doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00094.1
pii: Customer: THEIJPT-D-20-00094R1
pmc: PMC8489485
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02874014']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

41-50

Informations de copyright

©Copyright 2021 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Références

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):296-303
pubmed: 28463149
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32
pubmed: 27044935
Acta Oncol. 2018 Mar;57(3):368-374
pubmed: 29034790
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Sep 1;75(1):29-35
pubmed: 19467803
Acta Oncol. 2012 Nov;51(8):963-74
pubmed: 22966812
Lancet. 2011 Dec 17;378(9809):2104-11
pubmed: 22056152
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jan 1;52(1):6-13
pubmed: 11777617
Int J Part Ther. 2019 Winter;5(3):11-23
pubmed: 31788504
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):e17-24
pubmed: 21324610
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 1;31(31):3860-8
pubmed: 24101042
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):585-91
pubmed: 18172188
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890
pubmed: 28296582
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Apr 1;61(5):1285-90
pubmed: 15817329
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060
pubmed: 27339115
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jun 1;74(2):383-7
pubmed: 18947938
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Nov;11(11):1066-73
pubmed: 20933466
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7
pubmed: 25702876
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Nov 1;63(3):765-71
pubmed: 15913914
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Jul 15;50(4):1021-31
pubmed: 11429230
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):85-92
pubmed: 18355982
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74
pubmed: 17765406
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1061-1069
pubmed: 27339116

Auteurs

Richard Choo (R)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

David W Hillman (DW)

Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Thomas Daniels (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Carlos Vargas (C)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Jean Claude Rwigema (JC)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Kimberly Corbin (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Sameer Keole (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Sujay Vora (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Kenneth Merrell (K)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Bradley Stish (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Thomas Pisansky (T)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Brian Davis (B)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Adam Amundson (A)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

William Wong (W)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.

Classifications MeSH