Nanoenabled Bioelectrical Modulation.


Journal

Accounts of materials research
ISSN: 2643-6728
Titre abrégé: Acc Mater Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101772849

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Oct 2021
Historique:
received: 16 06 2021
revised: 27 07 2021
entrez: 1 11 2021
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 2 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Studying the formation and interactions between biological systems and artificial materials is significant for probing complex biophysical behaviors and addressing challenging biomedical problems. Bioelectrical interfaces, especially nanostructure-based, have improved compatibility with cells and tissues and enabled new approaches to biological modulation. In particular, free-standing and remotely activated bioelectrical devices demonstrate potential for precise biophysical investigation and efficient clinical therapies. Interacting with single cells or organelles requires devices of sufficiently small size for high resolution probing. Nanoscale semiconductors, given their diverse functionalities, are promising device platforms for subcellular modulation. Tissue-level modulation requires additional consideration regarding the device's mechanical compliance for either conformal contact with the tissue surface or seamless three-dimensional (3D) biointegration. Flexible or even open-framework designs are essential in such methods. For chronic organ integration, the highest level of biocompatibility is required for both the materials and device configurations. Additionally, a scalable and high-throughput design is necessary to simultaneously interact with many individual cells in the organ. The physical, chemical, and mechanical stabilities of devices for organ implantation may be improved by ensuring matching of mechanical behavior at biointerfaces, including passivation or resistance designs to mitigate physiological impacts, or incorporating self-healing or adaptative properties. Recent research demonstrates principles of nanostructured material designs that can be used to improve biointerfaces. Nanoenabled extracellular interfaces were frequently used for either electrical or remote optical modulation of cells and tissues. In particular, methods are now available for designing and screening nanostructured silicon, especially chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-derived nanowires and two-dimensional (2D) nanostructured membranes, for biological modulation in vitro and in vivo. For intra- and intercellular biological modulation, semiconductor/cell composites have been created through the internalization of nanowires, and such cellular composites can even integrate with living tissues. This approach was demonstrated for both neuronal and cardiac modulation. At a different front, laser-derived nanocrystalline semiconductors showed electrochemical and photoelectrochemical activities, and they were used to modulate cells and organs. Recently, self-assembly of nanoscale building blocks enabled fabrication of efficient monolithic carbon-based electrodes for in vitro stimulation of cardiomyocytes, ex vivo stimulation of retinas and hearts, and in vivo stimulation of sciatic nerves. Future studies on nanoenabled bioelectrical modulation should focus on improving efficiency and stability of current and emerging technologies. New materials and devices can access new interrogation targets, such as subcellular structures, and possess more adaptable and responsive properties enabling seamless integration. Drawing inspiration from energy science and catalysis can help in such progress and open new avenues for biological modulation. The fundamental study of living bioelectronics could yield new cellular composites for diverse biological signaling control. In situ self-assembled biointerfaces are of special interest in this area as cell type targeting can be achieved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34723193
doi: 10.1021/accountsmr.1c00132
pmc: PMC8547132
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

895-906

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Authors. Co-published by ShanghaiTech University and American Chemical Society.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Références

Nat Nanotechnol. 2018 Mar;13(3):260-266
pubmed: 29459654
Vision Res. 1999 Jul;39(15):2577-87
pubmed: 10396626
Nat Nanotechnol. 2018 Oct;13(10):965-971
pubmed: 30104618
Nano Lett. 2020 Feb 12;20(2):1226-1232
pubmed: 31904975
Sci Adv. 2016 Dec 16;2(12):e1601039
pubmed: 28028534
Nat Mater. 2020 Jun;19(6):590-603
pubmed: 32461684
Nanotechnology. 2020 Feb 7;31(7):072001
pubmed: 31627201
Acc Chem Res. 2018 Jul 17;51(7):1609-1620
pubmed: 29924584
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 6;9(1):786
pubmed: 29511183
Nat Mater. 2016 Jun;15(6):679-85
pubmed: 26974408
Nat Rev Mater. 2018 Dec;3(12):473-490
pubmed: 31656635
Science. 2012 Sep 28;337(6102):1640-4
pubmed: 23019646
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021 Apr 7;13(13):15490-15500
pubmed: 33779140
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 8;116(2):413-421
pubmed: 30538202
Nanotechnology. 2012 Aug 31;23(34):344004
pubmed: 22885907
Nat Nanotechnol. 2019 Aug;14(8):783-790
pubmed: 31263191
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Jul;2(7):508-521
pubmed: 30906646
Biophys J. 2018 Jan 23;114(2):283-288
pubmed: 29273263
Nano Lett. 2018 Jul 11;18(7):4487-4492
pubmed: 29894630
Chem Soc Rev. 2020 Nov 21;49(22):7978-8035
pubmed: 32672777
Front Neurosci. 2017 Dec 12;11:663
pubmed: 29311765
Nat Nanotechnol. 2021 Feb;16(2):206-213
pubmed: 33288948
Sci Adv. 2020 Mar 20;6(12):eaay2789
pubmed: 32219158
Nat Nanotechnol. 2017 Aug;12(8):750-756
pubmed: 28581510
Nat Mater. 2016 Jul;15(7):782-791
pubmed: 27088236
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Dec;23(12):1522-1536
pubmed: 33199897
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 Oct 20;8:557447
pubmed: 33195123
Nat Mater. 2016 Sep;15(9):1023-30
pubmed: 27348576
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 6;:
pubmed: 31811026
Nature. 2017 Nov 8;551(7679):232-236
pubmed: 29120427
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 21;12(1):492
pubmed: 33479237
Nat Mater. 2012 Nov;11(11):986-94
pubmed: 22922448
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 10;5:5714
pubmed: 25493446
iScience. 2020 Feb 21;23(2):100833
pubmed: 31982781
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Feb;38(2):217-224
pubmed: 31768044
Nat Commun. 2012 Mar 13;3:736
pubmed: 22415827
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22531-22539
pubmed: 31624124
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 7;7(15):
pubmed: 33827809
Nat Nanotechnol. 2020 Aug;15(8):690-697
pubmed: 32601446
Nano Lett. 2019 Aug 14;19(8):5781-5789
pubmed: 31347851
Sci Adv. 2020 Aug 21;6(34):
pubmed: 32937377
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1372-1376
pubmed: 32193327

Auteurs

Aleksander Prominski (A)

Department of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
The Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.

Pengju Li (P)

Pritzker School of Molecular Engineering, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.

Bernadette A Miao (BA)

Department of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.

Bozhi Tian (B)

Department of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
The James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
The Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.

Classifications MeSH