Defining Factors Associated with High-quality Surgery Following Radical Cystectomy: Analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Cystectomy Audit.

Bladder cancer British Association of Urological Surgeons audit Centralisation Outcomes Quality surgery Radical cystectomy

Journal

European urology open science
ISSN: 2666-1683
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Open Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101771568

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Historique:
accepted: 24 08 2021
entrez: 1 11 2021
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 2 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with high morbidity. To evaluate healthcare and surgical factors associated with high-quality RC surgery. Patients within the prospective British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry between 2014 and 2017 were included in this study. High-quality surgery was defined using pathological (absence of positive surgical margins and a minimum of a level I lymph node dissection template with a minimum yield of ten or more lymph nodes), recovery (length of stay ≤10 d), and technical (intraoperative blood loss <500 ml for open and <300 ml for minimally invasive RC) variables. A multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model was utilised to determine the factors associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery and index admission mortality. A total of 4654 patients with a median age of 70.0 yr underwent RC by 152 surgeons at 78 UK hospitals. The median surgeon and hospital operating volumes were 23.0 and 47.0 cases, respectively. A total of 914 patients (19.6%) received high-quality surgery. The minimum annual surgeon volume and hospital volume of ≥20 RCs/surgeon/yr and ≥68 RCs/hospital/yr, respectively, were the thresholds determined to achieve better rates of high-quality RC. The mixed-effect logistic regression model found that recent surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.34, We report that annual surgeon operating volume and use of minimally invasive RC were predictors of high-quality surgery. Patients receiving high-quality surgery were independently associated with lower index admission mortality. Our results support the role of centralisation of complex oncology and implementation of a quality assurance programme to improve the delivery of care. In this registry study of patients treated with surgical excision of the urinary bladder for bladder cancer, we report that patients treated by a surgeon with a higher annual operative volume and a minimally invasive approach were associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery. Patients treated with high-quality surgery were more likely to be discharged alive following surgery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Radical cystectomy (RC) is associated with high morbidity.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To evaluate healthcare and surgical factors associated with high-quality RC surgery.
DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
Patients within the prospective British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) registry between 2014 and 2017 were included in this study.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
High-quality surgery was defined using pathological (absence of positive surgical margins and a minimum of a level I lymph node dissection template with a minimum yield of ten or more lymph nodes), recovery (length of stay ≤10 d), and technical (intraoperative blood loss <500 ml for open and <300 ml for minimally invasive RC) variables. A multilevel hierarchical mixed-effect logistic regression model was utilised to determine the factors associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery and index admission mortality.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
A total of 4654 patients with a median age of 70.0 yr underwent RC by 152 surgeons at 78 UK hospitals. The median surgeon and hospital operating volumes were 23.0 and 47.0 cases, respectively. A total of 914 patients (19.6%) received high-quality surgery. The minimum annual surgeon volume and hospital volume of ≥20 RCs/surgeon/yr and ≥68 RCs/hospital/yr, respectively, were the thresholds determined to achieve better rates of high-quality RC. The mixed-effect logistic regression model found that recent surgery (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.34,
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We report that annual surgeon operating volume and use of minimally invasive RC were predictors of high-quality surgery. Patients receiving high-quality surgery were independently associated with lower index admission mortality. Our results support the role of centralisation of complex oncology and implementation of a quality assurance programme to improve the delivery of care.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
In this registry study of patients treated with surgical excision of the urinary bladder for bladder cancer, we report that patients treated by a surgeon with a higher annual operative volume and a minimally invasive approach were associated with the receipt of high-quality surgery. Patients treated with high-quality surgery were more likely to be discharged alive following surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34723215
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.08.005
pii: S2666-1683(21)00163-4
pmc: PMC8546928
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1-10

Informations de copyright

© 2021 The Author(s).

Références

Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 16;108(7):1534-40
pubmed: 23481180
Eur Urol. 2020 Oct;78(4):520-530
pubmed: 32690321
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):447-461
pubmed: 27324428
J Urol. 2010 Jun;183(6):2165-70
pubmed: 20399473
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2781-9
pubmed: 15199091
Adv Urol. 2015;2015:323157
pubmed: 26697063
Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):649-660
pubmed: 27234997
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov;10(11):609-10
pubmed: 24101123
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):363-75
pubmed: 25582930
Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2401-8
pubmed: 18383515
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):22-9
pubmed: 25770482
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;2(4):349-354
pubmed: 31277772
BJU Int. 2018 Apr;121(4):632-639
pubmed: 29124853
Lancet. 1988 Apr 2;1(8588):727-9
pubmed: 2895260
BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):880-885
pubmed: 29359882
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):490-497
pubmed: 31009290
J Urol. 2012 Jun;187(6):2011-7
pubmed: 22498229
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2012 Aug;61(4):653-664
pubmed: 23913985
Eur Urol. 2020 Nov;78(5):719-730
pubmed: 32624275
Eur Urol. 2009 Jan;55(1):164-74
pubmed: 18675501
J Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun 15;99(8):508-12
pubmed: 19466741
Urology. 2016 Nov;97:124-129
pubmed: 27491964
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Jan;7(1):117-123
pubmed: 31072807
Eur Urol. 2018 Mar;73(3):363-371
pubmed: 28801130
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 May;2(3):265-273
pubmed: 31200840
Int J Cancer. 2014 Aug 15;135(4):905-12
pubmed: 24420527
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):604-611
pubmed: 30337060
Cancer Treat Rev. 2016 Jun;47:22-31
pubmed: 27231966
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104
pubmed: 32360052
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):e0166221
pubmed: 27820855
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2525-2536
pubmed: 29976469
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Apr;3(2-3):273-279
pubmed: 28753745
Eur Urol. 2020 Jul;78(1):43-59
pubmed: 31563501
Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):644-645
pubmed: 30782337

Auteurs

Wei Shen Tan (WS)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Jeffrey J Leow (JJ)

Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Maya Marchese (M)

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Ashwin Sridhar (A)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Giles Hellawell (G)

Department of Urology, Northwick Park Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Matthew Mossanen (M)

Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Jeremy Y C Teoh (JYC)

The S H Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Sarah Fowler (S)

British Association of Urological Surgeons, London, UK.

Alexandra J Colquhoun (AJ)

Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Jo Cresswell (J)

Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.

James W F Catto (JWF)

Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Quoc-Dien Trinh (QD)

Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

John D Kelly (JD)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH