Effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following total shoulder replacement: A systematic review.

Arthroplasty glenohumeral rehabilitation replacement shoulder systematic review

Journal

Clinical rehabilitation
ISSN: 1477-0873
Titre abrégé: Clin Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8802181

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 4 2 2022
entrez: 1 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To investigate the effectiveness of early versus delayed rehabilitation following total shoulder replacement. Intervention systematic review with narrative synthesis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to the 29 Randomised controlled trials comparing early versus delayed rehabilitation following primary anatomic, primary reverse, or revision total shoulder replacement. A revised Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomised controlled trials was used, as well as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the quality of evidence. A narrative synthesis was undertaken. Three eligible randomised controlled trials ( No differences were seen in patient-reported or clinician-reported outcomes at 12 months post-surgery between early and delayed rehabilitation following total shoulder replacement. There is very low-quality evidence that early rehabilitation may improve shoulder pain and function in the early post-operative phase following anatomic total shoulder replacement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34723708
doi: 10.1177/02692155211044137
pmc: PMC8807994
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

190-203

Références

BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Oct;13(5):557-572
pubmed: 34659491
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015 Mar;8(1):83-91
pubmed: 25672497
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Mar;29(3):442-450
pubmed: 31924519
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 May;29(5):924-930
pubmed: 31780336
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1128-32
pubmed: 26897317
JSES Open Access. 2019 Jun 14;3(2):99-107
pubmed: 31334436
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Jan;26(1):144-148
pubmed: 27545048
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019 May;49(5):337-346
pubmed: 31021690
Orthopedics. 2018 May 1;41(3):e416-e423
pubmed: 29658976
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Musculoskeletal Care. 2020 Sep;18(3):359-364
pubmed: 32329209
BMJ. 2019 Feb 20;364:l298
pubmed: 30786996
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Dec;25(12):1918-1924
pubmed: 27727055
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Apr;12(2):136-143
pubmed: 32313563

Auteurs

Maria Moffatt (M)

5289Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

Gareth Whelan (G)

8749York Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.

Peter Gill (P)

523611Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Salford, UK.

Bruno Mazuquin (B)

5289Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

Peter Edwards (P)

1649Curtin University, Perth, Australia.

Chris Peach (C)

98564Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Ronnie Davies (R)

Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

Marie Morgan (M)

2102University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS, Derby, UK.

Chris Littlewood (C)

5289Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH