Effects of Telerehabilitation Interventions on Heart Failure Management (2015-2020): Scoping Review.
CVD
adherence
anxiety
cardiac rehabilitation
cardiovascular disease
depression
heart failure
mental health
physical capacity
quality of life
rehabilitation
telehealth
telerehabilitation
Journal
JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2021
01 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
18
04
2021
accepted:
18
09
2021
revised:
15
09
2021
entrez:
1
11
2021
pubmed:
2
11
2021
medline:
2
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Heart failure is one of the world's most frequently diagnosed cardiovascular diseases. An important element of heart failure management is cardiac rehabilitation, the goal of which is to improve patients' recovery, functional capacity, psychosocial well-being, and health-related quality of life. Patients in cardiac rehabilitation may lack sufficient motivation or may feel that the rehabilitation process does not meet their individual needs. One solution to these challenges is the use of telerehabilitation. Although telerehabilitation has been available for several years, it has only recently begun to be utilized in heart failure studies. Especially within the past 5 years, we now have several studies focusing on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for heart failure management, all with varying results. Based on a review of these studies, this paper offers an assessment of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation as applied to heart failure management. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the effects of telerehabilitation in the management of heart failure by systematically reviewing the available scientific literature within the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. The literature search was carried out using PubMed and EMBASE. After duplicates were removed, 77 articles were screened and 12 articles were subsequently reviewed. The review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews) guidelines. As measures of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation, the following outcomes were used: patients' quality of life, physical capacity, depression or anxiety, and adherence to the intervention. A total of 12 articles were included in this review. In reviewing the effects of telerehabilitation for patients with heart failure, it was found that 4 out of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a single prospective study, and 4 out of 5 reviews reported increased quality of life for patients. For physical capacity, 4 RCTs and 3 systematic reviews revealed increased physical capacity. Depression or depressive symptoms were reported as being reduced in 1 of the 6 RCTs and in 2 of the 5 reviews. Anxiety or anxiety-related symptoms were reported as reduced in only 1 review. High adherence to the telerehabilitation program was reported in 4 RCTs and 4 reviews. It should be mentioned that some of the reviewed articles described the same studies although they employed different outcome measures. It was found that there is a tendency toward improvement in patients' quality of life and physical capacity when telerehabilitation was used in heart failure management. The outcome measures of depression, anxiety, and adherence to the intervention were found to be positive. Additional research is needed to determine more precise and robust effects of telerehabilitation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Heart failure is one of the world's most frequently diagnosed cardiovascular diseases. An important element of heart failure management is cardiac rehabilitation, the goal of which is to improve patients' recovery, functional capacity, psychosocial well-being, and health-related quality of life. Patients in cardiac rehabilitation may lack sufficient motivation or may feel that the rehabilitation process does not meet their individual needs. One solution to these challenges is the use of telerehabilitation. Although telerehabilitation has been available for several years, it has only recently begun to be utilized in heart failure studies. Especially within the past 5 years, we now have several studies focusing on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation for heart failure management, all with varying results. Based on a review of these studies, this paper offers an assessment of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation as applied to heart failure management.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this scoping review was to assess the effects of telerehabilitation in the management of heart failure by systematically reviewing the available scientific literature within the period from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020.
METHODS
METHODS
The literature search was carried out using PubMed and EMBASE. After duplicates were removed, 77 articles were screened and 12 articles were subsequently reviewed. The review followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews) guidelines. As measures of the effectiveness of telerehabilitation, the following outcomes were used: patients' quality of life, physical capacity, depression or anxiety, and adherence to the intervention.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 12 articles were included in this review. In reviewing the effects of telerehabilitation for patients with heart failure, it was found that 4 out of 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), a single prospective study, and 4 out of 5 reviews reported increased quality of life for patients. For physical capacity, 4 RCTs and 3 systematic reviews revealed increased physical capacity. Depression or depressive symptoms were reported as being reduced in 1 of the 6 RCTs and in 2 of the 5 reviews. Anxiety or anxiety-related symptoms were reported as reduced in only 1 review. High adherence to the telerehabilitation program was reported in 4 RCTs and 4 reviews. It should be mentioned that some of the reviewed articles described the same studies although they employed different outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
It was found that there is a tendency toward improvement in patients' quality of life and physical capacity when telerehabilitation was used in heart failure management. The outcome measures of depression, anxiety, and adherence to the intervention were found to be positive. Additional research is needed to determine more precise and robust effects of telerehabilitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34723827
pii: v8i4e29714
doi: 10.2196/29714
pmc: PMC8593801
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e29714Informations de copyright
©Cathrine Skov Schacksen, Nanna Celina Henneberg, Janusiya Anajan Muthulingam, Yuh Morimoto, Ryuichi Sawa, Masakazu Saitoh, Tomoyuki Morisawa, Nobuyuki Kagiyama, Tetsuya Takahashi, Takatoshi Kasai, Hiroyuki Daida, Jens Refsgaard, Malene Hollingdal, Birthe Dinesen. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 01.11.2021.
Références
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Sep 19;8(9):e14517
pubmed: 31538944
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 12;16(3):
pubmed: 30759761
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2016;14(3):267-80
pubmed: 26759128
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD007130
pubmed: 20091618
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 15;21(4):e13281
pubmed: 30985284
J Physiother. 2011;57(3):157-63
pubmed: 21843830
Int J Telerehabil. 2010 Oct 27;2(2):31-4
pubmed: 25945175
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016 Jul;21(4):358-68
pubmed: 26524699
J Physiother. 2017 Apr;63(2):101-107
pubmed: 28336297
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1368-77
pubmed: 25261268
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015 Nov-Dec;35(6):380-9
pubmed: 26034937
Environ Health Prev Med. 2020 Sep 5;25(1):48
pubmed: 32891113
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:408-13
pubmed: 27390963
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017 Apr;14(4):271-277
pubmed: 28359169
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 12;(12):CD011273
pubmed: 25503364
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(35):e12069
pubmed: 30170422
BMJ. 2013 Feb 26;346:f653
pubmed: 23444424
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Clin Rehabil. 2012 Jan;26(1):45-57
pubmed: 21937519
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Feb 7;18(1):25
pubmed: 29415680
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012 Mar;2(1):38-49
pubmed: 24282695
Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Feb;12(2):164-71
pubmed: 20042423
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 1;85(3):365-9
pubmed: 11078308
Cureus. 2020 Sep 21;12(9):e10563
pubmed: 33101809
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Jun;14(3):256-63
pubmed: 24849304
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):300-308
pubmed: 31734701