Human-modified landscapes provide key foraging areas for a threatened flying mammal: The grey-headed flying-fox.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 21 06 2021
accepted: 18 10 2021
entrez: 1 11 2021
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Urban expansion is a major threat to natural ecosystems but also creates novel opportunities that adaptable species can exploit. The grey-headed flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) is a threatened, highly mobile species of bat that is increasingly found in human-dominated landscapes, leading to many management and conservation challenges. Flying-fox urbanisation is thought to be a result of diminishing natural foraging habitat or increasing urban food resources, or both. However, little is known about landscape utilisation of flying-foxes in human-modified areas, and how this may differ in natural areas. Here we examine positional data from 98 satellite-tracked P. poliocephalus for up to 5 years in urban and non-urban environments, in relation to vegetation data and published indices of foraging habitat quality. Our findings indicate that human-modified foraging landscapes sustain a large proportion of the P. poliocephalus population year-round. When individuals roosted in non-urban and minor-urban areas, they relied primarily on wet and dry sclerophyll forest, forested wetlands, and rainforest for foraging, and preferentially visited foraging habitat designated as high-quality. However, our results highlight the importance of human-modified foraging habitats throughout the species' range, and particularly for individuals that roosted in major-urban environments. The exact plant species that exist in human-modified habitats are largely undocumented; however, where this information was available, foraging by P. poliocephalus was associated with different dominant plant species depending on whether individuals roosted in 'urban' or 'non-urban' areas. Overall, our results demonstrate clear differences in urban- and non-urban landscape utilisation by foraging P. poliocephalus. However, further research is needed to understand the exact foraging resources used, particularly in human-modified habitats, and hence what attracts flying-foxes to urban areas. Such information could be used to modify the urban foraging landscape, to assist long-term habitat management programs aimed at minimising human-wildlife conflict and maximising resource availability within and outside of urban environments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34723974
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259395
pii: PONE-D-21-20335
pmc: PMC8559981
doi:

Banques de données

Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.3tx95x6gx']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0259395

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824):
pubmed: 26865295
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0220955
pubmed: 31415626
Behav Ecol. 2021 Feb 06;32(1):1-17
pubmed: 33708004
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133638
pubmed: 26207984
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):419-25
pubmed: 18048286
Vet Rec. 2004 May 22;154(21):664
pubmed: 15198316
Ecohealth. 2016 Mar;13(1):26-38
pubmed: 26403793
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 08;9(10):e109810
pubmed: 25295724
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0125881
pubmed: 26016629
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):390-4
pubmed: 17504734
Ecohealth. 2016 Mar;13(1):6-8
pubmed: 26631385
Bioscience. 2021 Jan 20;71(2):148-160
pubmed: 33613128
Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):942-50
pubmed: 24835452
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0231866
pubmed: 32330167
One Health. 2015 Aug 07;1:24-30
pubmed: 28616461
Aust Vet J. 2008 Nov;86(11):449-54
pubmed: 18959537
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 22;278(1725):3703-12
pubmed: 21561971
BMC Biol. 2020 Aug 21;18(1):101
pubmed: 32819385
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 08;9(1):e85122
pubmed: 24416350

Auteurs

Samantha H Yabsley (SH)

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

Jessica Meade (J)

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

John M Martin (JM)

Institute of Science and Learning, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Mosman, NSW, Australia.

Justin A Welbergen (JA)

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH