Human-modified landscapes provide key foraging areas for a threatened flying mammal: The grey-headed flying-fox.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
21
06
2021
accepted:
18
10
2021
entrez:
1
11
2021
pubmed:
2
11
2021
medline:
24
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Urban expansion is a major threat to natural ecosystems but also creates novel opportunities that adaptable species can exploit. The grey-headed flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus) is a threatened, highly mobile species of bat that is increasingly found in human-dominated landscapes, leading to many management and conservation challenges. Flying-fox urbanisation is thought to be a result of diminishing natural foraging habitat or increasing urban food resources, or both. However, little is known about landscape utilisation of flying-foxes in human-modified areas, and how this may differ in natural areas. Here we examine positional data from 98 satellite-tracked P. poliocephalus for up to 5 years in urban and non-urban environments, in relation to vegetation data and published indices of foraging habitat quality. Our findings indicate that human-modified foraging landscapes sustain a large proportion of the P. poliocephalus population year-round. When individuals roosted in non-urban and minor-urban areas, they relied primarily on wet and dry sclerophyll forest, forested wetlands, and rainforest for foraging, and preferentially visited foraging habitat designated as high-quality. However, our results highlight the importance of human-modified foraging habitats throughout the species' range, and particularly for individuals that roosted in major-urban environments. The exact plant species that exist in human-modified habitats are largely undocumented; however, where this information was available, foraging by P. poliocephalus was associated with different dominant plant species depending on whether individuals roosted in 'urban' or 'non-urban' areas. Overall, our results demonstrate clear differences in urban- and non-urban landscape utilisation by foraging P. poliocephalus. However, further research is needed to understand the exact foraging resources used, particularly in human-modified habitats, and hence what attracts flying-foxes to urban areas. Such information could be used to modify the urban foraging landscape, to assist long-term habitat management programs aimed at minimising human-wildlife conflict and maximising resource availability within and outside of urban environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34723974
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259395
pii: PONE-D-21-20335
pmc: PMC8559981
doi:
Banques de données
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.3tx95x6gx']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0259395Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 10;283(1824):
pubmed: 26865295
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 15;14(8):e0220955
pubmed: 31415626
Behav Ecol. 2021 Feb 06;32(1):1-17
pubmed: 33708004
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 24;10(7):e0133638
pubmed: 26207984
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 22;275(1633):419-25
pubmed: 18048286
Vet Rec. 2004 May 22;154(21):664
pubmed: 15198316
Ecohealth. 2016 Mar;13(1):26-38
pubmed: 26403793
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 08;9(10):e109810
pubmed: 25295724
PLoS One. 2015 May 27;10(5):e0125881
pubmed: 26016629
Biol Lett. 2007 Aug 22;3(4):390-4
pubmed: 17504734
Ecohealth. 2016 Mar;13(1):6-8
pubmed: 26631385
Bioscience. 2021 Jan 20;71(2):148-160
pubmed: 33613128
Ecol Lett. 2014 Aug;17(8):942-50
pubmed: 24835452
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0231866
pubmed: 32330167
One Health. 2015 Aug 07;1:24-30
pubmed: 28616461
Aust Vet J. 2008 Nov;86(11):449-54
pubmed: 18959537
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 22;278(1725):3703-12
pubmed: 21561971
BMC Biol. 2020 Aug 21;18(1):101
pubmed: 32819385
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 08;9(1):e85122
pubmed: 24416350