A frequentist one-step model for a simple network meta-analysis of time-to-event data in presence of an effect modifier.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
received: 16 06 2021
accepted: 12 10 2021
entrez: 1 11 2021
pubmed: 2 11 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Individual patient data (IPD) present particular advantages in network meta-analysis (NMA) because interactions may lead an aggregated data (AD)-based model to wrong a treatment effect (TE) estimation. However, fewer works have been conducted for IPD with time-to-event contrary to binary outcomes. We aimed to develop a general frequentist one-step model for evaluating TE in the presence of interaction in a three-node NMA for time-to-event data. One-step, frequentist, IPD-based Cox and Poisson generalized linear mixed models were proposed. We simulated a three-node network with or without a closed loop with (1) no interaction, (2) covariate-treatment interaction, and (3) covariate distribution heterogeneity and covariate-treatment interaction. These models were applied to the NMA (Meta-analyses of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer [MACH-NC] and Radiotherapy in Carcinomas of Head and Neck [MARCH]), which compared the addition of chemotherapy or modified radiotherapy (mRT) to loco-regional treatment with two direct comparisons. AD-based (contrast and meta-regression) models were used as reference. In the simulated study, no IPD models failed to converge. IPD-based models performed well in all scenarios and configurations with small bias. There were few variations across different scenarios. In contrast, AD-based models performed well when there were no interactions, but demonstrated some bias when interaction existed and a larger one when the modifier was not distributed evenly. While meta-regression performed better than contrast-based only, it demonstrated a large variability in estimated TE. In the real data example, Cox and Poisson IPD-based models gave similar estimations of the model parameters. Interaction decomposition permitted by IPD explained the ecological bias observed in the meta-regression. The proposed general one-step frequentist Cox and Poisson models had small bias in the evaluation of a three-node network with interactions. They performed as well or better than AD-based models and should also be undertaken whenever possible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34723994
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259121
pii: PONE-D-21-19631
pmc: PMC8559936
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0259121

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):485-495
pubmed: 28732142
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Sep;7(3):236-63
pubmed: 26754852
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):985-92
pubmed: 21330105
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 28;36(5):772-789
pubmed: 27910122
Stat Med. 2009 Jun 30;28(14):1861-81
pubmed: 19399825
Biometrics. 1998 Dec;54(4):1486-97
pubmed: 9883547
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):949-67
pubmed: 21411280
Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):932-44
pubmed: 20213715
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):66
pubmed: 29954322
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):451-464
pubmed: 28742955
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Mar 23;12:34
pubmed: 22443286
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):4-14
pubmed: 19446902
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002 Nov 13;2:13
pubmed: 12429069
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 30;21(16):2313-24
pubmed: 12210616
Med Decis Making. 2014 Oct;34(7):911-8
pubmed: 25260872
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1221-1237
pubmed: 28757375
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jul;33(5):641-56
pubmed: 23804508
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 May;27(5):1351-1364
pubmed: 27487843
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 29;16:37
pubmed: 27025706
Res Synth Methods. 2013 Mar;4(1):26-35
pubmed: 26053537
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212650
pubmed: 30785955
Stat Methods Med Res. 2008 Jun;17(3):279-301
pubmed: 17925316
Stat Med. 2021 Oct 28;:
pubmed: 34710951
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4279-92
pubmed: 16947139
BMC Med. 2013 Jul 04;11:159
pubmed: 23826681
Value Health. 2008 Sep-Oct;11(5):956-64
pubmed: 18489499
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug;62(8):857-64
pubmed: 19157778
Stat Med. 2005 Jun 15;24(11):1713-23
pubmed: 15724232
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Jun;9(2):179-194
pubmed: 29193801
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3840-57
pubmed: 22786621
Lancet. 2006 Sep 2;368(9538):843-54
pubmed: 16950362
Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 05;4:147
pubmed: 26537988
Biometrics. 1993 Mar;49(1):221-5
pubmed: 8513103
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Dec;3(4):312-24
pubmed: 26053424
Stat Med. 2018 Mar 30;37(7):1059-1085
pubmed: 29315733

Auteurs

Matthieu Faron (M)

Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.
Service de chirurgie viscérale oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Pierre Blanchard (P)

Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.
Service de radiothérapie, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Laureen Ribassin-Majed (L)

Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.
Service de Biostatistique et d'Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Jean-Pierre Pignon (JP)

Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.
Service de Biostatistique et d'Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Stefan Michiels (S)

Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.
Service de Biostatistique et d'Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Gwénaël Le Teuff (G)

Oncostat U1018, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Équipe Labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer, Villejuif, France.
Service de Biostatistique et d'Épidémiologie, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.

Articles similaires

Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell Humans Network Meta-Analysis Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Male
Humans Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Female Systematic Reviews as Topic Network Meta-Analysis
Humans Systematic Reviews as Topic Pain, Postoperative Network Meta-Analysis Analgesics, Opioid

Classifications MeSH