Optimization of prostate biopsy - Micro-Ultrasound versus MRI (OPTIMUM): A 3-arm randomized controlled trial evaluating the role of 29 MHz micro-ultrasound in guiding prostate biopsy in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.


Journal

Contemporary clinical trials
ISSN: 1559-2030
Titre abrégé: Contemp Clin Trials
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101242342

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2022
Historique:
received: 31 05 2021
revised: 04 10 2021
accepted: 28 10 2021
pubmed: 4 11 2021
medline: 1 4 2022
entrez: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Micro-ultrasound (microUS) is a novel ultrasound-based imaging modality which has demonstrated the ability to visualize prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound (mpMRI/US) fusion has recognized advantages for the performance of prostate biopsy, however, it encompasses additional cost, time and technical expertise to performing prostate biopsy in comparison to conventional trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy. MicroUS may simplify and optimize this pathway. OPTIMUM is a 3-arm randomized controlled trial comparing microUS guided biopsy with MRI/US fusion and MRI/MicroUS "contour-less" fusion. This trial will investigate whether microUS alone, or in combination with mpMRI, provides effective guidance during prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) for biopsy naïve subjects. 1200 subjects will be randomized. The economic impact will be evaluated. The rate of csPCa (defined as Grade Group 2 and above) in each arm will be compared. The primary hypothesis is non-inferiority of csPCa rate between the MRI/US fusion arm and the microUS-only arm (including the blinded microUS-only portion of the MRI/MicroUS arm). As a secondary objective, the csPCa rate between MRI/MicroUS fusion and MRI/US fusion arms will also be compared. Other secondary objectives include the increase in rate of patients diagnosed with csPCa due to each type of sample (mpMRI targeted, microUS targeted, systematic), the negative predictive value of each imaging modality, and a health economic analysis of the procedures in each arm. OPTIMUM will determine whether microUS can be used as an alternative to MRI/US fusion biopsy. The trial will also evaluate the efficacy of the simplified "contour-less" MRI/MicroUS fusion procedure. The adoption of the microUS technique will increase the proportion of men who can benefit from modern imaging-centric diagnostic strategies, and may help reduce variability, complexity, waiting time and cost within the diagnostic pathway.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Micro-ultrasound (microUS) is a novel ultrasound-based imaging modality which has demonstrated the ability to visualize prostate cancer. Multiparametric MRI/ultrasound (mpMRI/US) fusion has recognized advantages for the performance of prostate biopsy, however, it encompasses additional cost, time and technical expertise to performing prostate biopsy in comparison to conventional trans-rectal ultrasound biopsy. MicroUS may simplify and optimize this pathway.
METHODS
OPTIMUM is a 3-arm randomized controlled trial comparing microUS guided biopsy with MRI/US fusion and MRI/MicroUS "contour-less" fusion. This trial will investigate whether microUS alone, or in combination with mpMRI, provides effective guidance during prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) for biopsy naïve subjects. 1200 subjects will be randomized. The economic impact will be evaluated.
RESULTS
The rate of csPCa (defined as Grade Group 2 and above) in each arm will be compared. The primary hypothesis is non-inferiority of csPCa rate between the MRI/US fusion arm and the microUS-only arm (including the blinded microUS-only portion of the MRI/MicroUS arm). As a secondary objective, the csPCa rate between MRI/MicroUS fusion and MRI/US fusion arms will also be compared. Other secondary objectives include the increase in rate of patients diagnosed with csPCa due to each type of sample (mpMRI targeted, microUS targeted, systematic), the negative predictive value of each imaging modality, and a health economic analysis of the procedures in each arm.
CONCLUSIONS
OPTIMUM will determine whether microUS can be used as an alternative to MRI/US fusion biopsy. The trial will also evaluate the efficacy of the simplified "contour-less" MRI/MicroUS fusion procedure. The adoption of the microUS technique will increase the proportion of men who can benefit from modern imaging-centric diagnostic strategies, and may help reduce variability, complexity, waiting time and cost within the diagnostic pathway.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34728381
pii: S1551-7144(21)00354-2
doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106618
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106618

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Laurence Klotz (L)

Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: Laurence.klotz@sunnybrook.ca.

Gerald Andriole (G)

Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, USA.

Hannes Cash (H)

Department of Urology, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Germany and PROURO, Berlin, Germany.

Matthew Cooperberg (M)

Depts of Urology and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Cancer, USA.

E David Crawford (ED)

Urology, University of California San Diego, USA.

Mark Emberton (M)

Division of Surgical and Interventional Science, University College London, UK.

Fernando Gomez-Sancha (F)

Head of department of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain.

Eric Klein (E)

Cleveland, Clinic Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, USA.

Giovanni Lughezzani (G)

Department of Urology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Italy.

Leonard Marks (L)

Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, USA.

Francesco Montorsi (F)

Department of Urology, Vita e Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Georg Salomon (G)

Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Clinic Eppendorf, Germany.

Rafael Sanchez-Salas (R)

Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.

Neal Shore (N)

Director, Carolina, Urologic Research Center, CMO, Urology/Surgical Oncology, GenesisCare, US, USA.

Samir Taneja (S)

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and Tandon School of Engineering, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH