A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with no retroperitoneal node dissection in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer - ENDO-3: ANZGOG trial 1911/2020.


Journal

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
accepted: 13 10 2021
pubmed: 4 11 2021
medline: 2 2 2022
entrez: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sentinel node biopsy is a surgical technique to explore lymph nodes for surgical staging of endometrial cancer, which has replaced full retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. However, the effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy, its value to patients, and potential harms compared with no-node dissection have never been shown in a randomized trial. Stage 1 will test recovery from surgery. Stage 2 will compare disease-free survival at 4.5 years between patients randomized to sentinel node biopsy versus no retroperitoneal node dissection. The primary hypothesis for stage 1 is that treatment with sentinel node biopsy will not cause detriment to patient outcomes (lymphedema, morbidity, loss of quality of life) and will not increase treatment-related morbidity or health services costs compared with patients treated without a retroperitoneal node dissection at 12 months after surgery. The primary hypothesis for stage 2 is that disease-free survival at 4.5 years after surgery in patients without retroperitoneal node dissection is not inferior to those receiving sentinel node biopsy. This phase III, open-label, two-arm, multistage, randomized non-inferiority trial (ENDO-3) will determine the value of sentinel node biopsy for surgical management of endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer are randomized to receive: (1) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with sentinel node biopsy or (2) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection. In stage 1, 444 patients will be enrolled to demonstrate feasibility and quality of life. If this is demonstrated, we will enroll another 316 patients in stage 2. Inclusion criteria include women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer; clinical stage 1, who meet the criteria for laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with uterine mesenchymal tumors are excluded. The endpoint for stage 1 is surgical recovery, with the proportion of patients returning to usual daily activities at 3 months post-surgery as measured with the EQ-5D. Stage 2 is disease-free survival at 4.5 years. 760 participants (both stages). Stage 1 commenced in January 2021 and is planned to be completed in December 2024 when 444 participants have completed 12 months' follow-up. Stage 2 will enroll a further 316 participants for a total of 760 patients. NCT04073706.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Sentinel node biopsy is a surgical technique to explore lymph nodes for surgical staging of endometrial cancer, which has replaced full retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. However, the effectiveness of sentinel node biopsy, its value to patients, and potential harms compared with no-node dissection have never been shown in a randomized trial.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES
Stage 1 will test recovery from surgery. Stage 2 will compare disease-free survival at 4.5 years between patients randomized to sentinel node biopsy versus no retroperitoneal node dissection.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS
The primary hypothesis for stage 1 is that treatment with sentinel node biopsy will not cause detriment to patient outcomes (lymphedema, morbidity, loss of quality of life) and will not increase treatment-related morbidity or health services costs compared with patients treated without a retroperitoneal node dissection at 12 months after surgery. The primary hypothesis for stage 2 is that disease-free survival at 4.5 years after surgery in patients without retroperitoneal node dissection is not inferior to those receiving sentinel node biopsy.
TRIAL DESIGN
This phase III, open-label, two-arm, multistage, randomized non-inferiority trial (ENDO-3) will determine the value of sentinel node biopsy for surgical management of endometrial cancer. Patients with endometrial cancer are randomized to receive: (1) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with sentinel node biopsy or (2) laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without retroperitoneal node dissection. In stage 1, 444 patients will be enrolled to demonstrate feasibility and quality of life. If this is demonstrated, we will enroll another 316 patients in stage 2.
MAJOR INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Inclusion criteria include women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer; clinical stage 1, who meet the criteria for laparoscopic or robotic total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with uterine mesenchymal tumors are excluded.
PRIMARY ENDPOINTS
The endpoint for stage 1 is surgical recovery, with the proportion of patients returning to usual daily activities at 3 months post-surgery as measured with the EQ-5D. Stage 2 is disease-free survival at 4.5 years.
SAMPLE SIZE
760 participants (both stages).
ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS
Stage 1 commenced in January 2021 and is planned to be completed in December 2024 when 444 participants have completed 12 months' follow-up. Stage 2 will enroll a further 316 participants for a total of 760 patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
NCT04073706.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34728527
pii: ijgc-2021-003029
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003029
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04073706']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Protocol Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1595-1601

Informations de copyright

© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: AO reports grants, personal fees, and other funding from SurgicalPerformance Pty Ltd, and grants from Medtronic, not directly related to the subject of this manuscript. AO reports consultancy fees from Baxter Healthcare Australia and New Zealand and Astra Zeneca Australia, not directly related to the subject of this manuscript. In addition, AO has a trademark licensed to SurgicalPerformance Pty Ltd. MJ reports speaker fees from Novartis, not related to this project.

Auteurs

Andreas Obermair (A)

Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia a.obermair@uq.edu.au.
Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Jim Nicklin (J)

Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Val Gebski (V)

Biostatistics and Research Methodology, University of Sydney NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Sandra C Hayes (SC)

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Nicholas Graves (N)

Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

Linda Mileshkin (L)

Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Ming Yin Lin (MY)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Phillip Beale (P)

Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Eva Baxter (E)

Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Kristy Robledo (K)

Biostatistics and Research Methodology, University of Sydney NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Carlos Salomon (C)

Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

George B Hanna (GB)

Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.

Monika Janda (M)

Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH