Access of migrant gold miners to compensation for occupational lung disease: Quantifying a legacy of injustice.
Compensation
Gold miners
Migrant workers
Silicosis
Southern Africa
Tuberculosis
Journal
Journal of migration and health
ISSN: 2666-6235
Titre abrégé: J Migr Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101774615
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
22
07
2021
revised:
28
09
2021
accepted:
04
10
2021
entrez:
3
11
2021
pubmed:
4
11
2021
medline:
4
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A legacy of the South African gold mining industry, now in decline, is a large burden of silicosis and tuberculosis among former migrant miners from rural South Africa and surrounding countries, particularly Lesotho and Mozambique. This neglected population faces significant barriers in filing claims for compensation for occupational lung disease. The objective of the study was to gain insight into the extent of such barriers, particularly for former miners and cross-border migrants. The database of a large gold mining company and the statutory compensation authority were analyzed for the period 1973-2018 by country of origin, age, and employment status at the time of claim filing. Proportions and odds ratios (ORs) for each of the compensable diseases were calculated by the above variables. Processing delays of claims were also calculated. Annual company employment declined from 240,718 in 1989 to 43,024 in 2018 and the proportion of cross-border migrants within the workforce from 51.0 to 28.1%. The compensation database contained 68,612 claims. The majority of compensable claims in all diagnostic categories were from active miners. The odds of cross-border miners relative to South African miners filing a claim depended on employment status. For example, the OR for Lesotho miners filing while in active employment was 1.86 (95% CI 1.81, 1.91), falling to 0.94 (95% CI 0.91, 0.98) among former miners. The equivalent findings for Mozambiquan miners were 0.95 (95% CI 0.91, 1.00), falling to 0.44 (95% CI 0.41, 0.47). Median processing delays over the whole period were from 1.1 years from filing to adjudication, and 3.8 years from filing to payment. The findings provide a quantitative view of differential access to occupational lung disease compensation, including long processing delays, among groups of migrant miners from the South African gold mines. There is a deficit of compensable claims for silicosis and silico-tuberculosis among former miners irrespective of country of origin. While cross-border miner groups appear to file more claims while active, this is reversed once they leave employment. Current large-scale efforts to provide medical examinations and compensation justice to this migrant miner population need political and public support and scrutiny of progress.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A legacy of the South African gold mining industry, now in decline, is a large burden of silicosis and tuberculosis among former migrant miners from rural South Africa and surrounding countries, particularly Lesotho and Mozambique. This neglected population faces significant barriers in filing claims for compensation for occupational lung disease. The objective of the study was to gain insight into the extent of such barriers, particularly for former miners and cross-border migrants.
METHODS
METHODS
The database of a large gold mining company and the statutory compensation authority were analyzed for the period 1973-2018 by country of origin, age, and employment status at the time of claim filing. Proportions and odds ratios (ORs) for each of the compensable diseases were calculated by the above variables. Processing delays of claims were also calculated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Annual company employment declined from 240,718 in 1989 to 43,024 in 2018 and the proportion of cross-border migrants within the workforce from 51.0 to 28.1%. The compensation database contained 68,612 claims. The majority of compensable claims in all diagnostic categories were from active miners. The odds of cross-border miners relative to South African miners filing a claim depended on employment status. For example, the OR for Lesotho miners filing while in active employment was 1.86 (95% CI 1.81, 1.91), falling to 0.94 (95% CI 0.91, 0.98) among former miners. The equivalent findings for Mozambiquan miners were 0.95 (95% CI 0.91, 1.00), falling to 0.44 (95% CI 0.41, 0.47). Median processing delays over the whole period were from 1.1 years from filing to adjudication, and 3.8 years from filing to payment.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The findings provide a quantitative view of differential access to occupational lung disease compensation, including long processing delays, among groups of migrant miners from the South African gold mines. There is a deficit of compensable claims for silicosis and silico-tuberculosis among former miners irrespective of country of origin. While cross-border miner groups appear to file more claims while active, this is reversed once they leave employment. Current large-scale efforts to provide medical examinations and compensation justice to this migrant miner population need political and public support and scrutiny of progress.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34729543
doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100065
pii: S2666-6235(21)00032-5
pmc: PMC8546409
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100065Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Prof. Ehrlich has written expert reports for plaintiff lawyers in silicosis litigation. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
New Solut. 2019 May;29(1):76-104
pubmed: 30791826
Lancet. 2009 Sep 5;374(9692):817-34
pubmed: 19709728
S Afr Med J. 2001 Jul;91(7):599-604
pubmed: 11544979
Int J Health Serv. 2013;43(4):699-719
pubmed: 24397235
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2021 Mar 1;27(2):79-87
pubmed: 33417344
Occup Environ Med. 1997 Jan;54(1):19-26
pubmed: 9072029
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Oct;34(4):305-13
pubmed: 9750935
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 23;370(4):301-10
pubmed: 24450889
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):862
pubmed: 29996801
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 20;21(1):953
pubmed: 34016067
Am J Ind Med. 2012 Jun;55(6):560-9
pubmed: 22431163
Am J Ind Med. 2009 Dec;52(12):901-8
pubmed: 19882740
Am J Public Health. 2011 Mar;101(3):524-30
pubmed: 20516372
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):829
pubmed: 32487111
Occup Environ Med. 1998 Jul;55(7):496-502
pubmed: 9816385
Am J Ind Med. 2010 Apr;53(4):398-404
pubmed: 19565628
Global Health. 2018 Jun 28;14(1):60
pubmed: 29954399
Am J Ind Med. 2018 Nov;61(11):877-885
pubmed: 30239033
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 3;18(1):93
pubmed: 28774280
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;61(10):811-6
pubmed: 15377766