Endobag use in laparoscopic gynecological surgeries: a systematic review.
Endobags
gynecological surgery
in-bag
laparoscopy
morcellation
Journal
Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy
ISSN: 1365-2931
Titre abrégé: Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9612996
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
4
11
2021
medline:
18
6
2022
entrez:
3
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the characteristics of endobags present in the market, the weight of specimen removed, complications of the operations and time required for in-bag morcellation in women undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries. We performed a systematic review, including prospective and retrospective studies, with or without randomized allocation of the patients, using endobags in laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries. We extracted data about study design, type and price of bag used, type of surgical procedure, specimen weight, mean time for morcellation and for total surgical procedure, complications. We included 11 studies, including a total of 1160 patients, in which the investigators used MorSafe, Endocatch II autosuture, More-Cell-Safe, Endocatch, EcoSac and LapBag. A wide range of specimens were morcellated with the largest successfully morcellated specimen weighing 2314 gr. Only half of the studies comparing uncontained and contained morcellation found a significant increase of total operative time. Finally, the number of complications was not increased when endobag was used. According to our systematic review, in-bag (contained) morcellation can be considered as a safe and unexpensive option, associated with a very low number of complications, even with large specimens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34730067
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2021.1982727
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM