Importance of Supplemental Patch Testing Beyond a Screening Series for Patients With Dermatitis: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience.


Journal

JAMA dermatology
ISSN: 2168-6084
Titre abrégé: JAMA Dermatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589530

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Dec 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 4 11 2021
medline: 26 3 2022
entrez: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patch test screening series for patients with dermatitis are limited and may miss clinically relevant contact allergens. To characterize individuals with dermatitis who showed clinically relevant patch test findings to supplemental (nonscreening) allergens or substances. A 17-year, retrospective cross-sectional analysis (January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2018) of North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) data from multiple centers in North America was conducted. A total of 43 417 patients with dermatitis underwent patch testing to the NACDG screening series in a standardized manner with 65 to 70 allergens and supplemental allergens as clinically indicated. Patients with 1 or more clinically relevant reactions to a supplemental (nonscreening) allergen/substance were analyzed between November 18, 2020, and March 12, 2021. The main outcomes were to assess the number of patients with clinically relevant reactions to supplemental (nonscreening) allergens and compare characteristics (including demographic characteristics and occupations) between patients with a clinically relevant patch test reaction to 1 or more supplemental allergens or substances (supplement-positive) and those without a reaction (supplement-negative) using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Secondary outcomes included sources of allergic contact dermatitis and, for occupationally related cases, specific occupations and industries. Of 43 417 patients included in the study who underwent patch testing to the NACDG screening series (65-70 allergens), 9507 individuals (21.9%) had currently relevant reactions to 1 or more supplemental allergens or substances. Of these, 6608 were women (69.5%) and the mean (SD) age was 47.2 (0.54) years. Compared with patients who had supplement-negative results, patients with supplement-positive findings were significantly less likely to be male (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85-0.94; P < .001) and/or have atopic dermatitis (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.93; P < .001). Common primary sites of dermatitis in 9499 patients with supplement-positive findings included the face (2856 [30.1%]), hands (2029 [21.4%]), and scattered/generalized distribution (1645 [17.3%]). Frequent sources of supplemental allergens in 9235 patients included personal care products (4746 [51.4%]) and clothing/wearing apparel (1674 [18.1%]). Of 9362 patients with available data, supplemental allergens/substances were occupationally related in 1580 (16.9%); of those with identified occupations, 25.1% (384 of 1529) were precision production, craft, or repair workers. Of 9507 patients with supplement-positive findings, 2447 (25.7%) had no currently relevant reactions to NACDG screening allergens. This cross-sectional study found that 21.9% of patients who underwent patch testing to an allergen screening series of 65 to 70 allergens had at least 1 relevant reaction to supplemental allergens/substances. Of these, one-quarter reacted only to a supplemental allergen/substance. Screening series include common, important allergens, but these findings suggest that the addition of specialty allergens and personal or work products is critical for the successful diagnosis and management of allergic contact dermatitis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34730775
pii: 2785613
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.4314
pmc: PMC8567181
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1456-1465

Références

Contact Dermatitis. 1980 Jan;6(2):151-2
pubmed: 7398277
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Aug;51(2):47-56
pubmed: 15373843
Dermatitis. 2008 May-Jun;19(3):137-41
pubmed: 18627685
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 May;28(3):258-262
pubmed: 27469077
Allergy. 2003 Dec;58(12):1304-7
pubmed: 14616107
Dermatitis. 2017 Jan/Feb;28(1):33-46
pubmed: 27775967
Contact Dermatitis. 2017 Sep;77(3):143-150
pubmed: 28233329
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Jun;36(6 Pt 1):914-8
pubmed: 9204054
Dermatitis. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;32(1):e14-e15
pubmed: 33273218
Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Jan;46(1):17-23
pubmed: 11918582
Contact Dermatitis. 2005 Oct;53(4):226-33
pubmed: 16191021
Dermatitis. 2009 May-Jun;20(3):149-60
pubmed: 19470301
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1192-6
pubmed: 20236197
Dermatitis. 2019 Mar/Apr;30(2):150-154
pubmed: 30829802
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Feb;56(1):119-128
pubmed: 30421329
Dermatitis. 2010 Sep-Oct;21(5):269-74
pubmed: 20920413
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993 Dec;29(6):1057-8
pubmed: 8245251
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):487-92
pubmed: 22123377
Contact Dermatitis. 2012 Mar;66(3):154-8
pubmed: 22320669
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Oct;61(4):231-5
pubmed: 19825095
Dermatitis. 2014 Jul-Aug;25(4):163-71
pubmed: 25000234
Food Chem Toxicol. 2013 May;55:8-17
pubmed: 23174517
Dermatitis. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):269-74
pubmed: 23169208
Contact Dermatitis. 1992 Mar;26(3):201-2
pubmed: 1505187
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Jan;7(1):89-95
pubmed: 30201159
Australas J Dermatol. 2021 Feb;62(1):51-56
pubmed: 32914863
Dermatitis. 2007 Jun;18(2):78-81
pubmed: 17498412
Dermatitis. 2004 Dec;15(4):176-83
pubmed: 15842061
JAMA. 1969 Sep 8;209(10):1487-92
pubmed: 5820104
Dermatitis. 2021 Mar-Apr 01;32(2):111-123
pubmed: 33970567
Arb Paul Ehrlich Inst Bundesamt Sera Impfstoffe Frankf A M. 1997;(91):195-202
pubmed: 9383910
Contact Dermatitis. 1991 Apr;24(4):253-8
pubmed: 1831105
Dermatitis. 2020 Sep-Oct;31(5):279-282
pubmed: 32947457
Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Dec;83(6):475-486
pubmed: 32829502
Dermatitis. 2013 Mar-Apr;24(2):50-9
pubmed: 23474444
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 May;68(5):259-68
pubmed: 23601062
Dermatitis. 2018 Nov/Dec;29(6):297-309
pubmed: 30422882
Dermatitis. 2013 Jan-Feb;24(1):10-21
pubmed: 23340394
Dermatitis. 2015 Jan-Feb;26(1):49-59
pubmed: 25581671
Dermatitis. 2022 Jan-Feb 01;33(1):62-69
pubmed: 35029350
Dermatitis. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;32(1):38-41
pubmed: 33449479
Contact Dermatitis. 2012 May;66(5):271-8
pubmed: 22486569
Hautarzt. 1994 May;45(5):292-8
pubmed: 7519590
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003 Jul;49(1):65-9
pubmed: 12833010
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Nov;63(5):789-98
pubmed: 20643495

Auteurs

Erin M Warshaw (EM)

Department of Dermatology, Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Department of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Department of Dermatology, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Michele Buonomo (M)

Department of Dermatology, Park Nicollet Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Department of Dermatology, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

Joel G DeKoven (JG)

Division of Dermatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Melanie D Pratt (MD)

Division of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Margo J Reeder (MJ)

Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.

Jonathan I Silverberg (JI)

Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

Donald V Belsito (DV)

Department of Dermatology, Columbia University Irving Medical School, New York, New York.

Howard I Maibach (HI)

Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.

Amber R Atwater (AR)

Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Marie-Claude Houle (MC)

Division of Dermatology, CHU de Quebec, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

James S Taylor (JS)

Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Kathryn A Zug (KA)

Department of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Vincent A DeLeo (VA)

Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.

Cory A Dunnick (CA)

Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado, Boulder.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH