Impact of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Therapy for Advanced Esophageal Cancer on Health-Related Quality of Life in KEYNOTE-181.
Adenocarcinoma
/ diagnosis
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
/ adverse effects
Disease Progression
Docetaxel
/ adverse effects
Esophageal Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
/ diagnosis
Functional Status
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Irinotecan
/ adverse effects
Paclitaxel
/ adverse effects
Quality of Life
Surveys and Questionnaires
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
4
11
2021
medline:
22
2
2022
entrez:
3
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the phase III KEYNOTE-181 study (NCT02564263) of patients with advanced esophageal cancer (EC), pembrolizumab monotherapy prolonged overall survival versus chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with programmed death ligand 1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 10. We present the results of the prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) analyses of the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), CPS ≥ 10, and CPS ≥ 10 SCC populations. HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), EORTC QLQ EC questionnaire (OES18), and EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D). Data were analyzed in patients who received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥ 1 HRQoL assessment. Key analyses included baseline to week 9 least squares mean change in global health status/quality of life, functional or symptom subscales, and time to deterioration (≥ 10-point deterioration) for specific subscales. The HRQoL population included 387 patients with SCC. Compliance and completion rates for all three questionnaires were similar in both treatment groups at baseline and week 9. No clinically meaningful differences in global health status/quality of life scores were observed between treatment groups from baseline to week 9 (least squares mean difference, 2.80; 95% CI, -1.48 to 7.08); patients in both treatment groups generally exhibited stable functioning and symptom scores of the QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 from baseline to week 9. Time to deterioration for pain (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.89), reflux (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.33 to 4.25), and dysphagia (HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.31) subscales were similar between treatment groups. These findings were generally similar in the CPS ≥ 10 (n = 218) and CPS ≥ 10 SCC (n = 166) subgroups. In patients with advanced EC, pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemotherapy maintained HRQoL in patients with SCC, CPS ≥ 10, and CPS ≥ 10 SCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34730989
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00601
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Docetaxel
15H5577CQD
Irinotecan
7673326042
pembrolizumab
DPT0O3T46P
Paclitaxel
P88XT4IS4D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02564263']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM