Effects of growth promoting microorganisms on tomato seedlings growing in different media conditions.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
08
2021
accepted:
18
10
2021
entrez:
3
11
2021
pubmed:
4
11
2021
medline:
25
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Plant growth-promoting microbes (PGPM) play vital roles in maintaining crop fitness and soil health in stressed environments. Research have included analysis-based cultivation of soil-microbial-plant relationships to clarify microbiota potential. The goal of the research was to (i) evaluate the symbiotic microorganism effects on tomato seedling fitness under stressed conditions simulating a fragile soil susceptible to degradation; (ii) compare the plant-microbial interactions after inoculation with microbial isolates and fungi-bacteria consortia; (iii) develop an effective crop-microbial network, which improves soil and plant status. The experimental design included non-inoculated treatments with peat and sand at ratios of 50:50, 70:30, 100:0 (v:v), inoculated treatments with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Azospirillum brasilense (AZ) using the aforementioned peat:sand ratios; and treatment with peat co-inoculated with AMF and Saccharothrix tamanrassetensis (S). AMF + AZ increased root fresh weight in peat substrate compared to the control (4.4 to 3.3 g plant-1). An increase in shoot fresh weight was detected in the AMF + AZ treatment with a 50:50 peat:sand ratio (10.1 to 8.5 g plant-1). AMF + AZ reduced antioxidant activity (DPPH) (18-34%) in leaves, whereas AMF + S had the highest DPPH in leaves and roots (45%). Total leaf phenolic content was higher in control with a decreased proportion of peat. Peroxidase activity was enhanced in AMF + AZ and AMF + S treatments, except for AMF + AZ in peat. Microscopic root assays revealed the ability of AMF to establish strong fungal-tomato symbiosis; the colonization rate was 78-89%. AMF + AZ accelerated K and Mg accumulation in tomato leaves in treatments reflecting soil stress. To date, there has been no relevant information regarding the successful AMF and Saccharothrix co-inoculation relationship. This study confirmed that AMF + S could increase the P, S, and Fe status of seedlings under high organic C content conditions. The improved tomato growth and nutrient acquisition demonstrated the potential of PGPM colonization under degraded soil conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34731216
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259380
pii: PONE-D-21-25205
pmc: PMC8565787
doi:
Substances chimiques
Culture Media, Conditioned
0
Phenol
339NCG44TV
Peroxidase
EC 1.11.1.7
Magnesium
I38ZP9992A
Potassium
RWP5GA015D
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0259380Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Nat Commun. 2015 Feb 23;6:6279
pubmed: 25703994
Molecules. 2019 Jul 04;24(13):
pubmed: 31277395
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Oct 26;18(1):258
pubmed: 30367616
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 16;11:559876
pubmed: 33178233
Nat Chem Biol. 2018 Aug;14(8):821-829
pubmed: 29942078
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0213643
pubmed: 30917147
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Sep 10;9:1329
pubmed: 30250477
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):499
pubmed: 33138787
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;100(13):5729-46
pubmed: 27188775
Food Chem. 2018 Jun 30;252:72-83
pubmed: 29478565
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(2):367-76
pubmed: 19264758
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Oct 02;6:815
pubmed: 26483827
AMB Express. 2016 Mar;6(1):3
pubmed: 26759120
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 17;10(1):19962
pubmed: 33203902
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 7;8(1):16496
pubmed: 30405159
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206388
pubmed: 30383779
Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2019 Nov 28;6:23
pubmed: 31798924
Microorganisms. 2019 Dec 16;7(12):
pubmed: 31888271
Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2019;30:59-74
pubmed: 30070651
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Dec 04;9:1801
pubmed: 30564264
J Biosci. 2003 Mar;28(2):243-7
pubmed: 12711817
Mycorrhiza. 2020 Jan;30(1):133-147
pubmed: 31823026
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 17;8(1):12349
pubmed: 30120319
Microbiol Res. 2020 Nov;240:126556
pubmed: 32683279
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011 Feb;61(Pt 2):310-314
pubmed: 20305067
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 04;10:1238
pubmed: 31231333
Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Oct;36(10):1771-82
pubmed: 23421735
Microbiol Res. 2016 Feb;183:68-79
pubmed: 26805620
Plant Cell. 2012 May;24(5):1921-35
pubmed: 22623496
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Mar 30;99(5):2275-2284
pubmed: 30324618
J Appl Microbiol. 2019 Sep;127(3):630-647
pubmed: 30844108
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 11;10(6):e0129591
pubmed: 26067663
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Apr 1;212:111996
pubmed: 33545409
Mycorrhiza. 2015 Jul;25(5):359-76
pubmed: 25391485
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 18;10(1):4916
pubmed: 32188930
Mycorrhiza. 2011 Feb;21(2):117-29
pubmed: 20499112
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Jan 25;9:1906
pubmed: 30740120
Mycologia. 2012 Jan-Feb;104(1):1-13
pubmed: 21933929
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130367
pubmed: 24686938
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 2;11(1):11559
pubmed: 34079029
J Agric Food Chem. 2020 Jun 3;68(22):6170-6180
pubmed: 32383861
J Chem Ecol. 2012 Jun;38(6):651-64
pubmed: 22623151
Front Nutr. 2020 Nov 30;7:587257
pubmed: 33330589
Mycorrhiza. 2011 May;21(4):315-21
pubmed: 21225294
AMB Express. 2018 May 4;8(1):73
pubmed: 29728787