Comparison of children's advocacy center responses to harmful sexual behavior among siblings: An international perspective.

Children's Advocacy Centers Cross-cultural comparison Harmful sexual behavior Multidisciplinary team Problematic sexual behavior Sibling sexual abuse

Journal

Child abuse & neglect
ISSN: 1873-7757
Titre abrégé: Child Abuse Negl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7801702

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 26 05 2021
revised: 14 10 2021
accepted: 19 10 2021
pubmed: 4 11 2021
medline: 19 3 2022
entrez: 3 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Harmful sexual behavior (HSB) is sexual behavior exhibited by children and adolescents that is developmentally inappropriate and/or harmful or abusive towards themselves or others. Victims of children with HSB are commonly siblings. Multiple professionals may be involved in cases of youth HSB involving siblings, which places Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) in a key position to directly address intrafamilial HSB. Approximately 25% of all cases seen at CACs in the U.S. are youth-initiated HSB. However, no known research has examined how CAC professionals approach decision-making and response to intrafamilial and sibling HSB, particularly across regions and cultures. To examine the perspectives of professionals from three separate CACs in Israel, eastern U.S., and southwestern U.S. regarding their decision-making and response process for sibling HSB. Thirty-seven multidisciplinary team members from the three CACs, including representatives from child welfare, law enforcement, family advocacy, mental health, and the court system, among others, participated in the study. Participants completed focus groups that asked them to discuss how their system would respond to a vignette case. Dedoose was used for thematic analysis. Using qualitative thematic analysis, results indicate all sites perceived sibling HSB as a family crisis, and they prioritized establishing safety and providing therapeutic interventions. Differences across sites were on how to establish safety and when to use legal actions. The study draws attention to the influences that formal policy and community contexts have on CAC decision-making, particularly around the availability of evidence-based treatments and caregiver engagement.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Harmful sexual behavior (HSB) is sexual behavior exhibited by children and adolescents that is developmentally inappropriate and/or harmful or abusive towards themselves or others. Victims of children with HSB are commonly siblings. Multiple professionals may be involved in cases of youth HSB involving siblings, which places Children's Advocacy Centers (CACs) in a key position to directly address intrafamilial HSB. Approximately 25% of all cases seen at CACs in the U.S. are youth-initiated HSB. However, no known research has examined how CAC professionals approach decision-making and response to intrafamilial and sibling HSB, particularly across regions and cultures.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the perspectives of professionals from three separate CACs in Israel, eastern U.S., and southwestern U.S. regarding their decision-making and response process for sibling HSB.
PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING
Thirty-seven multidisciplinary team members from the three CACs, including representatives from child welfare, law enforcement, family advocacy, mental health, and the court system, among others, participated in the study.
METHODS
Participants completed focus groups that asked them to discuss how their system would respond to a vignette case. Dedoose was used for thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Using qualitative thematic analysis, results indicate all sites perceived sibling HSB as a family crisis, and they prioritized establishing safety and providing therapeutic interventions. Differences across sites were on how to establish safety and when to use legal actions.
CONCLUSIONS
The study draws attention to the influences that formal policy and community contexts have on CAC decision-making, particularly around the availability of evidence-based treatments and caregiver engagement.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34731673
pii: S0145-2134(21)00440-3
doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105371
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105371

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Erin K Taylor (EK)

Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 940 NE 13(th) St Suite 4900, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. Electronic address: erin-taylor@ouhsc.edu.

Dafna Tener (D)

Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare at The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Jane F Silovsky (JF)

Center on Child Abuse and Neglect, Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 940 NE 13(th) St Suite 4900, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Abbie Newman (A)

Mission Kids Child Advocacy Center, 180 W. Germantown Pike, Suite 1, East Norriton, PA 19401, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH