Bayesian modelling of population trends in alcohol consumption provides empirically based country estimates for South Africa.
Alcohol exposure
Bayes
Coverage
Meta-regression
Trends
Journal
Population health metrics
ISSN: 1478-7954
Titre abrégé: Popul Health Metr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101178411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 11 2021
03 11 2021
Historique:
received:
18
03
2021
accepted:
10
10
2021
entrez:
4
11
2021
pubmed:
5
11
2021
medline:
1
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Alcohol use has widespread effects on health and contributes to over 200 detrimental conditions. Although the pattern of heavy episodic drinking independently increases the risk for injuries and transmission of some infectious diseases, long-term average consumption is the fundamental predictor of risk for most conditions. Population surveys, which are the main source of data on alcohol exposure, suffer from bias and uncertainty. This article proposes a novel triangulation method to reduce bias by rescaling consumption estimates by sex and age to match country-level consumption from administrative data. We used data from 17 population surveys to estimate age- and sex-specific trends in alcohol consumption in the adult population of South Africa between 1998 and 2016. Independently for each survey, we calculated sex- and age-specific estimates of the prevalence of drinkers and the distribution of individuals across consumption categories. We used these aggregated results, together with data on alcohol production, sales and import/export, as inputs of a Bayesian model and generated yearly estimates of the prevalence of drinkers in the population and the parameters that characterise the distribution of the average consumption among drinkers. Among males, the prevalence of drinkers decreased between 1998 and 2009, from 56.2% (95% CI 53.7%; 58.7%) to 50.6% (49.3%; 52.0%), and increased afterwards to 53.9% (51.5%; 56.2%) in 2016. The average consumption from 52.1 g/day (49.1; 55.6) in 1998 to 42.8 g/day (40.0; 45.7) in 2016. Among females the prevalence of current drinkers rose from 19.0% (17.2%; 20.8%) in 1998 to 20.0% (18.3%; 21.7%) in 2016 while average consumption decreased from 32.7 g/day (30.2; 35.0) to 26.4 g/day (23.8; 28.9). The methodology provides a viable alternative to current approaches to reconcile survey estimates of individual alcohol consumption patterns with aggregate administrative data. It provides sex- and age-specific estimates of prevalence of drinkers and distribution of average daily consumption among drinkers in populations. Reliance on locally sourced data instead of global and regional trend estimates better reflects local nuances and is adaptable to the inclusion of additional data. This provides a powerful tool to monitor consumption, develop burden of disease estimates and inform and evaluate public health interventions.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Alcohol use has widespread effects on health and contributes to over 200 detrimental conditions. Although the pattern of heavy episodic drinking independently increases the risk for injuries and transmission of some infectious diseases, long-term average consumption is the fundamental predictor of risk for most conditions. Population surveys, which are the main source of data on alcohol exposure, suffer from bias and uncertainty. This article proposes a novel triangulation method to reduce bias by rescaling consumption estimates by sex and age to match country-level consumption from administrative data.
METHODS
We used data from 17 population surveys to estimate age- and sex-specific trends in alcohol consumption in the adult population of South Africa between 1998 and 2016. Independently for each survey, we calculated sex- and age-specific estimates of the prevalence of drinkers and the distribution of individuals across consumption categories. We used these aggregated results, together with data on alcohol production, sales and import/export, as inputs of a Bayesian model and generated yearly estimates of the prevalence of drinkers in the population and the parameters that characterise the distribution of the average consumption among drinkers.
RESULTS
Among males, the prevalence of drinkers decreased between 1998 and 2009, from 56.2% (95% CI 53.7%; 58.7%) to 50.6% (49.3%; 52.0%), and increased afterwards to 53.9% (51.5%; 56.2%) in 2016. The average consumption from 52.1 g/day (49.1; 55.6) in 1998 to 42.8 g/day (40.0; 45.7) in 2016. Among females the prevalence of current drinkers rose from 19.0% (17.2%; 20.8%) in 1998 to 20.0% (18.3%; 21.7%) in 2016 while average consumption decreased from 32.7 g/day (30.2; 35.0) to 26.4 g/day (23.8; 28.9).
CONCLUSIONS
The methodology provides a viable alternative to current approaches to reconcile survey estimates of individual alcohol consumption patterns with aggregate administrative data. It provides sex- and age-specific estimates of prevalence of drinkers and distribution of average daily consumption among drinkers in populations. Reliance on locally sourced data instead of global and regional trend estimates better reflects local nuances and is adaptable to the inclusion of additional data. This provides a powerful tool to monitor consumption, develop burden of disease estimates and inform and evaluate public health interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34732207
doi: 10.1186/s12963-021-00270-3
pii: 10.1186/s12963-021-00270-3
pmc: PMC8565040
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ethanol
3K9958V90M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
43Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Addiction. 2017 Apr;112(4):705-710
pubmed: 27859902
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Sep;4(9):e642-53
pubmed: 27539806
Afr J Psychiatry (Johannesbg). 2011 Mar;14(1):30-7
pubmed: 21509408
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 28;16:363
pubmed: 27121289
Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1804-12
pubmed: 26294775
S Afr Med J. 2017 Dec 13;108(1):33-39
pubmed: 29262976
Lancet. 2018 Sep 22;392(10152):1015-1035
pubmed: 30146330
Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Aug;29(6):535-47
pubmed: 19592147
Lancet. 2015 Nov 14;386(10007):1922-1924
pubmed: 26386542
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Feb;40(2):173-175
pubmed: 32959417
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt A):123-9
pubmed: 26003432
Alcohol Res Health. 2003;27(1):30-8
pubmed: 15301398
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Oct;38(10):2509-16
pubmed: 25156779
Addiction. 2014 Oct;109(10):1657-66
pubmed: 24825591
Popul Health Metr. 2010 Mar 04;8:3
pubmed: 20202213
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jan;20(1):48-55
pubmed: 26197733
BMC Public Health. 2014 Dec 18;14:1297
pubmed: 25519144
Lancet. 2005 Feb 5-11;365(9458):519-30
pubmed: 15705462
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jan;76(1):158-64
pubmed: 25486405
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16(2):66-76
pubmed: 17623386
Addiction. 2003 Dec;98 Suppl 2:1-12
pubmed: 14984237
Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):2493-2502
pubmed: 31076174
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 30;12(1):
pubmed: 31906033
Popul Health Metr. 2012 Apr 10;10:6
pubmed: 22490226
Addiction. 2010 May;105(5):817-43
pubmed: 20331573
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 06;13:47
pubmed: 25858476
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Feb 18;13:24
pubmed: 23419127