Basic Psychological Needs in the Work Context: A Systematic Literature Review of Diary Studies.
autonomy
basic psychological needs
competence
diary studies
relatedness
self-determination theory
systematic review
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
21
04
2021
accepted:
20
09
2021
entrez:
4
11
2021
pubmed:
5
11
2021
medline:
5
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
According to the self-determination theory, individuals' basic psychological needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness should be satisfied for optimal psychological growth. The satisfaction of these needs seems to vary due to changes in a person's social context, and the outcomes of the satisfaction of these needs also vary along with the needs. Despite several studies investigating daily and weekly variations in need satisfaction and its correlates, no systematic investigation exists. This study aimed to conduct a narrative synthesis of existing quantitative diary studies of basic psychological needs in the work context. We specifically aimed to evaluate if psychological need satisfaction varies daily and weekly and judge whether they vary more daily or weekly. Additionally, we also aimed to review the literature regarding the relations between daily or weekly variations in need satisfaction and its assumed antecedents and outcomes. We included peer-reviewed articles in English that measured work-related basic psychological needs using a quantitative diary study design. Database searching (Web of Science, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Scopus) led to the extraction of 2 251 records by February 2020. Duplicates were removed, the remaining records were screened (
Identifiants
pubmed: 34733198
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.698526
pmc: PMC8558380
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
698526Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Coxen, van der Vaart, Van den Broeck and Rothmann.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jun;104(6):755-775
pubmed: 30640494
Evid Based Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):85-87
pubmed: 28320705
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;20(1):57-9
pubmed: 21286370
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Motiv Emot. 2018;42(5):706-724
pubmed: 30237648
J Psychol. 2016 Aug 17;150(6):755-78
pubmed: 27223847
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Jun;86(3):499-512
pubmed: 11419809
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Jun;104(6):727-754
pubmed: 30640492
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Sep;95(5):834-48
pubmed: 20836586
J Occup Health Psychol. 2019 Jun;24(3):373-386
pubmed: 29781629
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Jan;20(1):105-16
pubmed: 25151460
Stress Health. 2014 Aug;30(3):198-208
pubmed: 25100271
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Mar;91:60-69
pubmed: 30677589
Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:579-616
pubmed: 12499517
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 20;14(12):
pubmed: 29261139
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82
pubmed: 23092060
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010 Oct;23(5):563-84
pubmed: 20352542
J Occup Health Psychol. 2018 Jul;23(3):361-372
pubmed: 28836801
J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Jul;20(3):377-87
pubmed: 25705912