Comparison of the efficiency of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration using a 22G needle versus 25G needle for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer: a prospective randomized, crossover study.
Lung cancer
bronchoscopy
endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)
randomized trial
Journal
Translational lung cancer research
ISSN: 2218-6751
Titre abrégé: Transl Lung Cancer Res
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101646875
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
09
06
2021
accepted:
24
08
2021
entrez:
4
11
2021
pubmed:
5
11
2021
medline:
5
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is generally performed for the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer. Recently, a 25-gauge (G) needle became available, but robust evidence of its usefulness in routine clinical practice is still lacking. A prospective randomized crossover trial was performed, in which patients with suspected hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer underwent EBUS-TBNA. The primary endpoint was the rate of yield histology specimens containing malignant cells. From December 2018 to February 2020, 102 patients were randomly assigned to EBUS-TBNA using a 22G needle first, followed by a 25G needle (n=50) or EBUS-TBNA using a 25G needle first, followed by a 22G needle (n=52). There was no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy between the histology specimens obtained by using the 22G and 25G needles (75% No significant difference in the diagnostic yield between the 22G and 25G needles was observed for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of lung cancer, suggesting that needles of either gauge could be used for the biopsy. However, we would recommend use of the 22G needle, because it provided larger specimens and specimens containing larger numbers of malignant cells. University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (ID: UMIN000036680).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is generally performed for the diagnosis of hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with lung cancer. Recently, a 25-gauge (G) needle became available, but robust evidence of its usefulness in routine clinical practice is still lacking.
METHODS
METHODS
A prospective randomized crossover trial was performed, in which patients with suspected hilar/mediastinal lymph node metastasis of lung cancer underwent EBUS-TBNA. The primary endpoint was the rate of yield histology specimens containing malignant cells.
RESULTS
RESULTS
From December 2018 to February 2020, 102 patients were randomly assigned to EBUS-TBNA using a 22G needle first, followed by a 25G needle (n=50) or EBUS-TBNA using a 25G needle first, followed by a 22G needle (n=52). There was no difference in the diagnostic yield of malignancy between the histology specimens obtained by using the 22G and 25G needles (75%
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
No significant difference in the diagnostic yield between the 22G and 25G needles was observed for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of lung cancer, suggesting that needles of either gauge could be used for the biopsy. However, we would recommend use of the 22G needle, because it provided larger specimens and specimens containing larger numbers of malignant cells.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
University hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (ID: UMIN000036680).
Identifiants
pubmed: 34733625
doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-480
pii: tlcr-10-09-3745
pmc: PMC8512458
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
3745-3758Informations de copyright
2021 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-21-480). Dr. Sakai reports personal fees from AstraZeneca., outside the submitted work; Dr. Udagawa reports grants from Abbvie, MSD, AMGEN, Daiichi Sankyo and personal fees from Abbvie, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Taiho, Ono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amco, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work; Dr. Kirita reports personal fees from Olympus, Boston Scientific, MSD, Pfizer, Boeriger Ingelheim, Novartis, Chugai, Ono, Amco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, AstraZeneca, Lilly, outside the submitted work; Dr. Ota reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cook Medical, MSD, Ono, Taiho, outside the submitted work; Dr. Zenke reports grants from AstraZeneca, MSD, Merck Serono and personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Merck Serono, Lilly, Chugai, Ono, Taiho, Boheringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work; Dr. Matsumoto reports grants from Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Chugai, Merck and personal fees from Novartis, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Guardant Health, Thermo Fisher Scientific, outside the submitted work; Dr. Yoh reports grants from AstraZeneca, Lilly, Pfizer, Taiho, Bayer, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Abbvie and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Lilly, Taiho, Novartis, Daiichi Sankyo, Kyowa Kirin, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work; Dr. Niho reports grants from Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Chugai, Merck Serono, Ono, Teijin, Sanofi, Shionogi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho, Takeda and personal Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Chugai, Ono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho, Kyorin, Janssen, Novartis, outside the submitted work; Dr. Ishii reports grants from Ono, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, ORGANOGENIX and personal fees from Ono, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Lilly, Taiho, Roche Diagnostics, Chugai, Oncolys BioPharma, outside the submitted work; Dr. Goto reports grants from MSD, Merck, Lilly, Amgen Astellas BioPharma, Chugai, Eisai, Ono, NEC, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho, Kyowa Kirin, MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL LABORATORIES, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharm, Xcoo, Sysmex, Pfizer, KISSEI, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, AstraZeneca, Astellas, Loxo Oncology, Merus, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Ignyta, Shanghai Haihe Pharmaceutical, Thermo Fisher Scientific and personal fees from MSD, Lilly, Amgen Astellas BioPharma, Chugai, Eisai, Ono, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Amgen, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Novartis, Nippon Kayaku, Otsuka, Guardant Health, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Jan;125(1):30-40
pubmed: 27636102
Lung Cancer. 2005 Dec;50(3):347-54
pubmed: 16171897
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018 Jul 01;11(7):3647-3655
pubmed: 31949745
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e211S-e250S
pubmed: 23649440
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Mar;24(3):384-90
pubmed: 19032453
Respir Investig. 2021 Mar;59(2):235-239
pubmed: 33187889
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 26;7(17):24172-8
pubmed: 26992220
Eur Respir J. 2014 Oct;44(4):1011-22
pubmed: 25102961
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;96(5):1756-60
pubmed: 23953728
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(8):3643-3649
pubmed: 31559072
Clin Lung Cancer. 2018 May;19(3):230-238.e2
pubmed: 29277564
Respirology. 2011 Jan;16(1):90-4
pubmed: 20920141
Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):445-8
pubmed: 19418399
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80478
pubmed: 24236184
Endoscopy. 2013;45(2):86-92
pubmed: 23307148
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep;44(9):841-5
pubmed: 25057090
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:546390
pubmed: 19997511
Intern Med J. 2011 Dec;41(12):815-24
pubmed: 20002848
Front Oncol. 2014 Aug 11;4:204
pubmed: 25157335
Thorac Cancer. 2021 Jan;12(2):194-200
pubmed: 33185331
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Oct;86(4):1104-9; discussion 1109-10
pubmed: 18805141
Immunotherapy. 2017 May;9(6):499-506
pubmed: 28472902
Chest. 2016 Mar;149(3):816-35
pubmed: 26402427
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Nov;122(11):822-32
pubmed: 25045116
Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar;39(3):685-90
pubmed: 21852332
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Sep;10(9):1240-1242
pubmed: 26291007