Lateral mass screw placement in the atlas: description of a novel surgical technique, radiographic parameters, and review of the literature.
Atlas
C1
atlantoaxial fusion
cervical fusion
Journal
Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)
ISSN: 2414-469X
Titre abrégé: J Spine Surg
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101685460
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
23
03
2020
accepted:
30
08
2020
entrez:
4
11
2021
pubmed:
5
11
2021
medline:
5
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Numerous techniques of C1 lateral mass screw placement have been described. We sought to delineate the radiographic angle of safety medially and laterally and describe a novel surgical technique of C1 lateral mass screw placement. We sought to (I) determine the angle of safety medially and laterally of the C1 lateral mass; (II) assess the size available of the lateral mass in the AP and coronal planes; (III) describe novel technique of insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw utilizing navigation and a novel start point. We retrospectively reviewed cervical computed tomography (CT) images of normal adults. Radiographic measurements were then obtained using these images including the angle (degrees) of safety medially and lateral of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally, as well as the length and width (mm) of the C1 lateral masses. A novel surgical technique was used by identifying the confluence of the medial aspect of the posterior arch and the lateral mass. This confluence is then marked out as the C1 screw start point. Under navigation guidance, lateral mass screws were placed with 0 degrees of medial-lateral angulation from posterior to anterior. Forty-five patients with a mean age of 52.6±25.6 years (33% female) were included. The mean medial and lateral angle of safety of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally was 23±3.8 degrees and 32±5 degrees, respectively. Average length and width of the lateral mass was 17.7 and 13.3 mm respectively. This study describes the radiographic window of safety medially and laterally for safe and reproducible placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Further, a novel technique using a medial start point and navigation guidance with 0 degrees of angulation in the coronal plane is described. Further research is required to assess outcomes of patients utilizing this method as well as biomechanical studies to assess this construct strength compared to others that are frequently used.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Numerous techniques of C1 lateral mass screw placement have been described. We sought to delineate the radiographic angle of safety medially and laterally and describe a novel surgical technique of C1 lateral mass screw placement. We sought to (I) determine the angle of safety medially and laterally of the C1 lateral mass; (II) assess the size available of the lateral mass in the AP and coronal planes; (III) describe novel technique of insertion of a C1 lateral mass screw utilizing navigation and a novel start point.
METHODS
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed cervical computed tomography (CT) images of normal adults. Radiographic measurements were then obtained using these images including the angle (degrees) of safety medially and lateral of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally, as well as the length and width (mm) of the C1 lateral masses. A novel surgical technique was used by identifying the confluence of the medial aspect of the posterior arch and the lateral mass. This confluence is then marked out as the C1 screw start point. Under navigation guidance, lateral mass screws were placed with 0 degrees of medial-lateral angulation from posterior to anterior.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-five patients with a mean age of 52.6±25.6 years (33% female) were included. The mean medial and lateral angle of safety of the C1 lateral mass bilaterally was 23±3.8 degrees and 32±5 degrees, respectively. Average length and width of the lateral mass was 17.7 and 13.3 mm respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study describes the radiographic window of safety medially and laterally for safe and reproducible placement of C1 lateral mass screws. Further, a novel technique using a medial start point and navigation guidance with 0 degrees of angulation in the coronal plane is described. Further research is required to assess outcomes of patients utilizing this method as well as biomechanical studies to assess this construct strength compared to others that are frequently used.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34734138
doi: 10.21037/jss-20-566
pii: jss-07-03-335
pmc: PMC8511575
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
335-343Informations de copyright
2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jss-20-566). PP reports personal fees from Globus, personal fees from NuVasive, grants from ISSG, grants from Depuy, personal fees from Allosource, personal fees from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. ISA reports Research Funding from OrthoFix, outside the submitted work. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 15;28(22):E461-7
pubmed: 14624095
J Neurosurg. 1998 Apr;88(4):634-40
pubmed: 9525707
Asian Spine J. 2018 Apr;12(2):309-316
pubmed: 29713413
Neurosurgery. 2002 Feb;50(2):426-8
pubmed: 11844283
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 1;40(7):E404-10
pubmed: 25599290
Surg Radiol Anat. 2008 Oct;30(7):589-93
pubmed: 18575800
Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1549-55
pubmed: 23953731
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2729-2736
pubmed: 29651593
Neurosurgery. 2015 May;76(5):638-40
pubmed: 25886250
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Apr;60(3):279-84
pubmed: 348703
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jun;31(5):197-202
pubmed: 29389770
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Jun;22(4):233-9
pubmed: 19494741
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Apr 15;32(8):844-8
pubmed: 17426627
Neurol India. 2005 Dec;53(4):408-15
pubmed: 16565531
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Feb;19(2):63-71
pubmed: 21292929
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Nov 15;27(22):2503-8
pubmed: 12435982
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6):1154-60; discussion 1160
pubmed: 19934975
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jul 1;30(13):1519-23
pubmed: 15990666
Ann Surg. 1910 Feb;51(2):193-207
pubmed: 17862487
Neurosurgery. 1984 Mar;14(3):318-22
pubmed: 6709158
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 27;9(1):17652
pubmed: 31776364
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;129(1-2):47-53
pubmed: 7998495
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20 Suppl 2:S147-52
pubmed: 20490870
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2877-83
pubmed: 11074673
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Feb 15;40(4):E191-8
pubmed: 25398038
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1918-1924
pubmed: 29667139
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Feb;2(2):155-63
pubmed: 15739527
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jul 15;27(14):1494-8
pubmed: 12131706
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 May 1;28(9):888-95
pubmed: 12942004
Neurosurgery. 2001 Jul;49(1):65-8; discussion 69-70
pubmed: 11440461
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 15;26(22):2467-71
pubmed: 11707712
J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(5):532-7
pubmed: 19086710
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Feb 1;23(3):320-3
pubmed: 9507619
Spine J. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):661-5
pubmed: 17526435