Stent Graft Placement by Pseudoaneurysm of the Hepatic Arteries: Efficacy and Patency Rate in Follow-up.
Aneurysm
False
Hemorrhage
Hepatic artery
Stents
Journal
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
ISSN: 1432-086X
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003538
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
18
05
2021
accepted:
14
10
2021
pubmed:
5
11
2021
medline:
1
1
2022
entrez:
4
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate efficacy and patency status of stent graft implantation in the treatment of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm. A retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone endovascular treatment of hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms between 2011 and 2020 was performed. Medical records were examined to obtain patients' surgical histories and to screen for active bleeding. Angiographic data on vascular access, target vessel, material used and technical success, defined as the exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm by means of a stent graft with sufficient control of bleeding, were collected. Vessel patency at follow-up CT was analyzed and classified as short-term (< 6 weeks), mid-term (between 6 weeks and 1 year), and long-term patency (> 1 year). In case of stent occlusion, collateralization and signs of hepatic hypoperfusion were examined. In total, 30 patients were included and of these, 25 and 5 had undergone stent graft implantation and coiling, respectively. In patients with implanted stent grafts, technical success was achieved in 23/25 patients (92%). Follow-up CT scans were available in 16 patients, showing stent graft patency in 9/16 patients (56%). Short-term, mid-term, and long-term short-term stent patency was found in 81% (13/16), 40% (4/10), and 50% (2/4). In patients with stent graft occlusion, 86% (6/7) exhibited maintenance of arterial liver perfusion via collaterals and 14% (1/7) exhibited liver abscess during follow-up. Stent graft provides an effective treatment for hepatic artery pseudoaneurysms. Even though patency rates decreased as a function of time, stent occlusion was mainly asymptomatic due to sufficient collateralization.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34734334
doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02993-0
pii: 10.1007/s00270-021-02993-0
pmc: PMC8716354
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
21-28Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Oct;201(4):554-9
pubmed: 16183493
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018 Apr;59(2):225-231
pubmed: 28548473
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Apr;39(4):575-81
pubmed: 26797022
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):W627-34
pubmed: 21512055
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jul;25(7):2004-14
pubmed: 25693662
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jul;28(7):2027-38
pubmed: 24519028
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Oct;45(10):3337-3341
pubmed: 32095858
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Nov;64(5):1373-1383
pubmed: 27462001
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug 7;16(29):3716-22
pubmed: 20677346
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 Mar;22(3):294-301
pubmed: 21353982
Surgery. 2003 Apr;133(4):440-2
pubmed: 12717363
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;71(2):111
pubmed: 29425606
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec 12;2:107
pubmed: 29354764
J Pharm Pract. 2018 Jun;31(3):335-341
pubmed: 28629303
Eur J Radiol. 2014 Oct;83(10):1799-803
pubmed: 25059599
CVIR Endovasc. 2019 Oct 22;2(1):33
pubmed: 32026015
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2013 Oct;47(7):551-4
pubmed: 24052448