Results of the RENAISSANCE Study: REsponse to BNT162b2 COVID-19 vacciNe-short- And long-term Immune reSponSe evAluatioN in health Care workErs.
Antibodies, Viral
/ blood
BNT162 Vaccine
/ administration & dosage
COVID-19
/ epidemiology
COVID-19 Serological Testing
/ methods
COVID-19 Vaccines
/ administration & dosage
Female
Health Personnel
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Immunity, Active
/ immunology
Immunocompetence
Italy
/ epidemiology
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2
/ immunology
Sex Factors
Journal
Mayo Clinic proceedings
ISSN: 1942-5546
Titre abrégé: Mayo Clin Proc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0405543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
10
05
2021
revised:
01
07
2021
accepted:
18
08
2021
pubmed:
6
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
5
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike (S) IgG antibody production after vaccination with BNT162b2 and the protection from symptomatic breakthrough infections in health care workers. This prospective observational study (RENAISSANCE) had as a primary end point the evaluation of serologic response to BNT162b2 14 days after a second dose. SARS-CoV-2 anti-S IgG antibodies were evaluated with LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG assay (DiaSorin S.p.A.), which is able to detect the presence of both binding and neutralizing antibodies for trimeric spike glycoprotein. Participants were recruited from February 1, 2021, to February 22, 2021. Occurrence of vaccine breakthrough infections was assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction on symptomatic and contact cases up to June 6, 2021. Of 2569 staff evaluated, only 4 were nonresponders (0.16%; 95% CI, 0.04% to 0.41%). All 4 nonresponders were severely immunosuppressed and receiving treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid. At 14 days after the second dose, 67.5% (1733) of staff had anti-S IgG titers of 2000 BAU/mL or higher; 19.2% (494), between 1500 and 2000 BAU/mL; 9.8% (251), between 1000 and 1500 BAU/mL; and 3.4% (87), 1000 BAU/mL or lower. Women had a higher probability of having higher titers than men (64.5% [1044/1618] vs 58.3% [410/703]; P=.005). This was confirmed after adjustment for age group (odds ratio, 1.275; 95% CI, 1.062 to 1.531; P=.009). Four months after the end of the vaccination program, only 13 participants (0.26%) had experienced a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, including 1 nonresponder. This was the only participant requiring hospitalization for severe COVID-19. The vaccination campaign among health care workers at the ASST GOM Niguarda has resulted in a marked serologic response and reduction of incident COVID-19 cases. Yet, the lack of protection should not be overlooked in immunocompromised individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34736776
pii: S0025-6196(21)00638-8
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.08.013
pmc: PMC8403667
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
COVID-19 Vaccines
0
BNT162 Vaccine
N38TVC63NU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2966-2979Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:183-184
pubmed: 34118427
Arch Intern Med. 1984 May;144(5):973-5
pubmed: 6231898
JAMA. 2021 Apr 13;325(14):1467-1469
pubmed: 33646292
J Virus Erad. 2021 Jun;7(2):100046
pubmed: 34026245
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 10;384(23):2212-2218
pubmed: 33882219
N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1412-1423
pubmed: 33626250
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jan;109(1):9-15
pubmed: 25573105
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):966-967
pubmed: 33684351
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Jun;9(6):1364-7
pubmed: 23584248
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Cell. 2021 Apr 29;184(9):2348-2361.e6
pubmed: 33730597
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 17;:
pubmed: 34137815
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27(12):1861.e1-1861.e5
pubmed: 34375755
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):585-594
pubmed: 34289274
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0236311
pubmed: 32898153
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):99-111
pubmed: 33306989
JAMA. 2021 Jun 22;325(24):2457-2465
pubmed: 33956048
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):664-666
pubmed: 34233096
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 8;385(2):187-189
pubmed: 33951357
Science. 2021 Mar 12;371(6534):1152-1153
pubmed: 33514629
Crit Rev Immunol. 1986;6(2):123-49
pubmed: 2942335
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):671-681
pubmed: 33545094
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 18;9(5):
pubmed: 34070196
Cell Host Microbe. 2021 May 12;29(5):747-751.e4
pubmed: 33887205
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017 Oct 6;33:577-599
pubmed: 28992436
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Aug;519:60-63
pubmed: 33857476
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1784-1786
pubmed: 33720292
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 6;384(18):1774-1775
pubmed: 33755376
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Nature. 2021 May;593(7857):130-135
pubmed: 33684923
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2439-2450
pubmed: 33053279