Surveillance of laboratory exposures to human pathogens and toxins, Canada 2020.

Centre for Biosecurity Laboratory Incident Notification Canada human pathogens and toxins laboratory exposures laboratory incidents laboratory-acquired infections surveillance

Journal

Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada
ISSN: 1188-4169
Titre abrégé: Can Commun Dis Rep
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9303729

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Oct 2021
Historique:
entrez: 5 11 2021
pubmed: 6 11 2021
medline: 6 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The Laboratory Incident Notification Canada surveillance system monitors laboratory incidents reported under the Laboratory incident exposures occurring in licensed Canadian laboratories in 2020 were analyzed. The exposure incident rate was calculated and the descriptive statistics were performed. Exposure incidents were analyzed by sector, activity type, occurrence type, root cause and pathogen/toxin. Affected persons were analyzed by education, route of exposure sector, role and laboratory experience. The time between the incident and the reporting date was also analyzed. Forty-two incidents involving 57 individuals were reported to Laboratory Incident Notification Canada in 2020. There were no suspected or confirmed laboratory acquired infections. The annual incident exposure rate was 4.2 incidents per 100 active licenses. Most exposure incidents occurred during microbiology activities (n=22, 52.4%) and/or were reported by the hospital sector (n=19, 45.2%). Procedural issues (n=16, 27.1%) and sharps-related incidents (n=13, 22.0%) were the most common occurrences. Most affected individuals were exposed via inhalation (n=28, 49.1%) and worked as technicians or technologists (n=36, 63.2%). Issues with standard operating procedures was the most common root cause (n=24, 27.0%), followed by human interactions (n=21, 23.6%). The median number of days between the incident and the reporting date was six days. The rate of laboratory incidents were lower in 2020 than 2019, although the ongoing pandemic may have contributed to this decrease because of the closure of non-essential workplaces, including laboratories, for a portion of the year. The most common occurrence type was procedural while issues with not complying to standard operating procedures and human interactions as the most cited root causes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Laboratory Incident Notification Canada surveillance system monitors laboratory incidents reported under the
METHODS METHODS
Laboratory incident exposures occurring in licensed Canadian laboratories in 2020 were analyzed. The exposure incident rate was calculated and the descriptive statistics were performed. Exposure incidents were analyzed by sector, activity type, occurrence type, root cause and pathogen/toxin. Affected persons were analyzed by education, route of exposure sector, role and laboratory experience. The time between the incident and the reporting date was also analyzed.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty-two incidents involving 57 individuals were reported to Laboratory Incident Notification Canada in 2020. There were no suspected or confirmed laboratory acquired infections. The annual incident exposure rate was 4.2 incidents per 100 active licenses. Most exposure incidents occurred during microbiology activities (n=22, 52.4%) and/or were reported by the hospital sector (n=19, 45.2%). Procedural issues (n=16, 27.1%) and sharps-related incidents (n=13, 22.0%) were the most common occurrences. Most affected individuals were exposed via inhalation (n=28, 49.1%) and worked as technicians or technologists (n=36, 63.2%). Issues with standard operating procedures was the most common root cause (n=24, 27.0%), followed by human interactions (n=21, 23.6%). The median number of days between the incident and the reporting date was six days.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The rate of laboratory incidents were lower in 2020 than 2019, although the ongoing pandemic may have contributed to this decrease because of the closure of non-essential workplaces, including laboratories, for a portion of the year. The most common occurrence type was procedural while issues with not complying to standard operating procedures and human interactions as the most cited root causes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34737674
doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v47i10a04
pii: 471004
pmc: PMC8525605
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

422-429

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None.

Références

Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Nov 02;43(11):228-235
pubmed: 29770052
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018 Nov 01;44(11):297-304
pubmed: 30996692
Clin Infect Dis. 2009 Jul 1;49(1):142-7
pubmed: 19480580
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;35(8):1247-58
pubmed: 27234593
Appl Biosaf. 2009;14(3):135-143
pubmed: 20890389
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019 Sep 05;45(9):244-251
pubmed: 31650987
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 26;3(2):
pubmed: 30274433

Auteurs

Nicole Atchessi (N)

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Megan Striha (M)

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Rojiemiahd Edjoc (R)

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Emily Thompson (E)

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Maryem El Jaouhari (M)

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Marianne Heisz (M)

Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

Classifications MeSH