COVID-19 serological evaluation in a cohort of Vaccinated and Seropositive healthcare workers.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 10 2021
19 10 2021
Historique:
received:
08
09
2021
accepted:
04
10
2021
entrez:
5
11
2021
pubmed:
6
11
2021
medline:
12
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection represents an unprecedented public health problem and, at present, vaccination is the only weapon available to combat the infection. The simplest and most immediate method to quantify the response of the subject's immune system to vaccination and / or infection is the serological assessment of the antibody titer. The objective of our study was 1) to evaluate the presence of antibody responses in a sample of healthcare workers subjected to a complete vaccination course as per ministerial provisions (double dose for negatives and single dose for ex-SARS-CoV subjects -2 positive) with Comirnaty vaccine (Pfizer / BioNTech) 2) evaluate the presence of statistically significant associations for sex, age and previous positive swab. the antibody levels of both nucleocapsid antibodies and anti-Sars-CoV2 Spike antibodies of the study subjects were examined with the electrochemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) method developed by Roche®. The cut-off value, as suggested by the manufacturer, for anti-nucleocapsid antibodies was 1 COI, while the Ig Spike value was 0.8 I / mL. The study sample was stratified by age (≤45 years, 46-55, ≥56 years old), previous positive molecular swab, gender and IgG S1 / S2 values at the completed vaccination course (≤200, ≥200 AU / mL ). Statistical analyzes were carried out with the R software. almost all of the sample (89.45%) showed IgG Spike values> 200 AU / mL with statistically significant associations in relation to sex (greater in females, p≤0.05), to previous swab positivity in the presence of a vaccine dose (n = 44; p <0.001) and at age (with greater antibody response in subjects under 45; p <0.001). The current study confirms what is reported in the literature. In the light of the results obtained, it could be interesting to promote studies that evaluate the antibody titers trend over time a) in women of childbearing age and postmenopausal age b) in particular categories of subjects with chronic degenerative diseases to assess the actual need for doses booster, it being understood that the immune system response is guaranteed by both cellular and humoral immunity and that the antibody titer does not faithfully reflect the protection obtained.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34739458
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12261
pmc: PMC8851009
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021415Références
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 01;9(7):
pubmed: 34358130
mBio. 2020 Sep 18;11(5):
pubmed: 32948688
Cell. 2020 Sep 3;182(5):1077-1092
pubmed: 32846157
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Sep;20(9):529-536
pubmed: 32728222
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 Feb;21(2):73-82
pubmed: 33340022
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 May 4;11(1):24
pubmed: 32366281
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Mar;19(3):141-154
pubmed: 33024307
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 22;12(1):1813
pubmed: 33753738
PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250602
pubmed: 33939733
Nat Immunol. 2021 Jan;22(1):25-31
pubmed: 33154590
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7837):315-320
pubmed: 32846427
EBioMedicine. 2021 Aug;70:103539
pubmed: 34391087