COVID-19 pandemic impact on the therapeutic setting in Mental Health Services.
Journal
Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis
ISSN: 2531-6745
Titre abrégé: Acta Biomed
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101295064
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 11 2021
03 11 2021
Historique:
received:
03
09
2021
accepted:
30
09
2021
entrez:
5
11
2021
pubmed:
6
11
2021
medline:
12
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The new 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak forced mental health providers to overcome their general reluctance about telematic assistance, shifting from a face-to-face approach to online therapy to promote continuity of care for psychiatric patients. An ad-hoc web-based survey questionnaire assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on therapeutic setting in Mental Health Services was sent via email from March 15, 2021 to June 15, 2021 to mental health providers in Genova, Italy. The survey was anonymous and a free Google Forms® software was used. Two hundred nineteen mental health providers completed the survey, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 65%. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, the continuity of care was mainly guaranteed using electronic devices. Psychologists reported a higher availability of video call assistance service to guarantee continuity of care for psychiatric patients compared to psychiatrists and psychotherapists (p<0,001). Psychiatrists reported the lowest degree of satisfaction about this new telematic approach (p<0,01), while psychologists and to a lesser extent psychotherapists speculated to use it even in non-pandemic times (p=0,02). COVID-19 pandemic creates an opportunity to overcome normative, technological and cultural barriers to the use of online psychotherapy, showing the importance of adapting the therapeutic setting to both collective and individual needs. Despite initial concerns about its effectiveness and efficacy, a general degree of satisfaction was expressed by the majority of the mental health providers. Further efforts will be needed to enhance this new way of working and to train therapists with particular regard to those employed in the public health system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The new 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak forced mental health providers to overcome their general reluctance about telematic assistance, shifting from a face-to-face approach to online therapy to promote continuity of care for psychiatric patients.
METHODS
An ad-hoc web-based survey questionnaire assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on therapeutic setting in Mental Health Services was sent via email from March 15, 2021 to June 15, 2021 to mental health providers in Genova, Italy. The survey was anonymous and a free Google Forms® software was used.
RESULTS
Two hundred nineteen mental health providers completed the survey, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 65%. During the COVID-19 pandemic period, the continuity of care was mainly guaranteed using electronic devices. Psychologists reported a higher availability of video call assistance service to guarantee continuity of care for psychiatric patients compared to psychiatrists and psychotherapists (p<0,001). Psychiatrists reported the lowest degree of satisfaction about this new telematic approach (p<0,01), while psychologists and to a lesser extent psychotherapists speculated to use it even in non-pandemic times (p=0,02).
CONCLUSIONS
COVID-19 pandemic creates an opportunity to overcome normative, technological and cultural barriers to the use of online psychotherapy, showing the importance of adapting the therapeutic setting to both collective and individual needs. Despite initial concerns about its effectiveness and efficacy, a general degree of satisfaction was expressed by the majority of the mental health providers. Further efforts will be needed to enhance this new way of working and to train therapists with particular regard to those employed in the public health system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34739470
doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12227
pmc: PMC8851016
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2021448Références
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 20;91(9-S):34-39
pubmed: 32701915
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 20;91(9-S):87-89
pubmed: 32701921
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 20;91(9-S):95-96
pubmed: 32701924
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 28;91(3):ahead of print
pubmed: 32921742
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 11;11:558974
pubmed: 33024437
Rev Med Suisse. 2018 Feb 7;14(593):335-338
pubmed: 29412528
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Apr;26(4):377-379
pubmed: 32202977
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2020 Jun;68(3):447-454
pubmed: 32589054
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 28;18(3):
pubmed: 33525740
Psychol Serv. 2012 May;9(2):111-131
pubmed: 22662727
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2020 Jun;68(3):437-446
pubmed: 32589042
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2019 Apr;67(2):249-279
pubmed: 31088141
Int J Psychoanal. 1991;72 ( Pt 4):639-56
pubmed: 1797718
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Dec;23(12):860-864
pubmed: 32815742
Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;28(5):517-520
pubmed: 32689815
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jun 13;56(6):
pubmed: 32545811
Ir J Psychol Med. 2020 Dec;37(4):250-255
pubmed: 32434596