Patient and aneurysm factors associated with aneurysm recanalization after coiling.
aneurysm
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
09
07
2021
accepted:
20
10
2021
pubmed:
7
11
2021
medline:
19
10
2022
entrez:
6
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
One limitation of the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is aneurysm recanalization. The Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of intracranial Aneurysm (ARETA) study is a prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating the factors associated with recanalization after endovascular treatment. The current analysis is focused on patients treated by coiling or balloon-assisted coiling (BAC). Postoperative, mid-term vascular imaging, and evolution of aneurysm occlusion were independently evaluated by two neuroradiologists. A 3-grade scale was used for aneurysm occlusion (complete occlusion, neck remnant, and aneurysm remnant) and for occlusion evolution (improved, stable, and worsened). Recanalization was defined as any worsening of aneurysm occlusion. Between December 2013 and May 2015, 16 French neurointerventional departments enrolled 1289 patients. A total of 945 aneurysms in 908 patients were treated with coiling or BAC. The overall rate of aneurysm recanalization at mid-term follow-up was 29.5% (95% CI 26.6% to 32.4%): 28.9% and 30.3% in the coiling and BAC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses factors independently associated with recanalization were current smoking (36.6% in current smokers vs 24.5% in current non-smokers (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.4); p=0.0001), ruptured status (31.9% in ruptured aneurysms vs 25.1% in unruptured (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1); p=0.006), aneurysm size ≥10 mm (48.8% vs 26.5% in aneurysms <10 mm (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9); p<0.0001), wide neck (32.1% vs 25.8% in narrow neck (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1); p=0.02), and MCA location (34.3% vs 28.3% in other locations (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.1); p=0.04). Several factors are identified by the ARETA study as playing a role in aneurysm recanalization after coiling: current smoking, aneurysm status (ruptured), aneurysm size (≥10 mm), neck size (wide neck), and aneurysm location (middle cerebral artery). This finding has important consequences in clinical practice. URL: http://www. gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01942512.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
One limitation of the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms is aneurysm recanalization. The Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of intracranial Aneurysm (ARETA) study is a prospective multicenter cohort study evaluating the factors associated with recanalization after endovascular treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
The current analysis is focused on patients treated by coiling or balloon-assisted coiling (BAC). Postoperative, mid-term vascular imaging, and evolution of aneurysm occlusion were independently evaluated by two neuroradiologists. A 3-grade scale was used for aneurysm occlusion (complete occlusion, neck remnant, and aneurysm remnant) and for occlusion evolution (improved, stable, and worsened). Recanalization was defined as any worsening of aneurysm occlusion.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Between December 2013 and May 2015, 16 French neurointerventional departments enrolled 1289 patients. A total of 945 aneurysms in 908 patients were treated with coiling or BAC. The overall rate of aneurysm recanalization at mid-term follow-up was 29.5% (95% CI 26.6% to 32.4%): 28.9% and 30.3% in the coiling and BAC groups, respectively. In multivariate analyses factors independently associated with recanalization were current smoking (36.6% in current smokers vs 24.5% in current non-smokers (OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.4); p=0.0001), ruptured status (31.9% in ruptured aneurysms vs 25.1% in unruptured (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1); p=0.006), aneurysm size ≥10 mm (48.8% vs 26.5% in aneurysms <10 mm (OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9); p<0.0001), wide neck (32.1% vs 25.8% in narrow neck (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.1); p=0.02), and MCA location (34.3% vs 28.3% in other locations (OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.1); p=0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Several factors are identified by the ARETA study as playing a role in aneurysm recanalization after coiling: current smoking, aneurysm status (ruptured), aneurysm size (≥10 mm), neck size (wide neck), and aneurysm location (middle cerebral artery). This finding has important consequences in clinical practice.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
BACKGROUND
URL: http://www.
CLINICALTRIALS
RESULTS
gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01942512.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34740986
pii: neurintsurg-2021-017972
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017972
pmc: PMC9606530
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01942512']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1096-1101Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: LP: Support for the present manuscript from the French Ministry of Health (institutional); Consulting fees from Balt, Microvention, Perflow, Phenox, Vesalio; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Balt, Microvention, Perflow, Phenox; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Balt, Microvention, Phenox. CC: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Medtronic, Microvention, MIVI, Stryker. MA: Grants or contracts from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Balt, Cerus, Stryker; Consulting fees from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Balt, Cerus, Stryker; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Balt, Cerus, Stryker; Payment for expert testimony from Cerenovus; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Medtronic, Cerenovus, Balt, Cerus, Stryker; Participation to DSMB or AB from Cerenovus. GM: Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Medtronic, Microvention. NS: Consulting fees from Medtronic, Balt; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Balt, Cerus, Stryker. CP: payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Microvention. LS: Grants or contracts from Philips (institutional); Consulting fees from Balt, Medtronic, Phenox, Microvention, Stryker; Payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Medtronic, Balt, Microvention, Stryker; Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Balt, Medtronic, Microvention, Stryker. PW: Support for the present manuscript from the French Ministry of Health (institutional); Grants or contracts from Medtronic, Stryker, Penumbra (institutional); Consulting fees from Microvention-Terumo; Participation to DSMB or AB from Mr-Clean Direct, TENSION, Protect-U. PW is a chairperson for UK Neurointerventional group and JNIS associate editor.
Références
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Oct;13(10):918-923
pubmed: 33443137
J Neurosurg. 2018 Apr;128(4):992-998
pubmed: 28644100
Stroke. 2003 Jun;34(6):1398-403
pubmed: 12775880
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Jun;13(6):534-540
pubmed: 32895321
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Mar;20(3):391-9
pubmed: 10219403
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Oct;28(9):1755-61
pubmed: 17885238
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;40(3):517-523
pubmed: 30819769
Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):546-53
pubmed: 21131582
Neurosurgery. 2012 Mar;70(3):537-53; discussion 553-4
pubmed: 21904266
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Dec;12(12):1219-1225
pubmed: 32546636
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Oct;11(10):1009-1014
pubmed: 31048457
J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;47(4):292-300
pubmed: 31539582
Turk Neurosurg. 2017 Oct 18;:
pubmed: 29131233
J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan;122(1):95-100
pubmed: 25380112
Stroke. 2016 May;47(5):1407-12
pubmed: 27026629
Stroke. 2008 Jan;39(1):120-5
pubmed: 18048860
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Oct;29(9):1777-81
pubmed: 18719039
Lancet. 2002 Oct 26;360(9342):1267-74
pubmed: 12414200
Neurology. 2017 Sep 26;89(13):1408-1415
pubmed: 28855408
Neurosurgery. 2019 Dec 1;85(6):750-761
pubmed: 30445544
Oncotarget. 2017 May 16;8(20):33676-33682
pubmed: 28430600
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Sep;33(8):1475-80
pubmed: 22517279
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 May;35(5):935-42
pubmed: 24481333
J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):863-74
pubmed: 20672900
J Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;42(2):80-5
pubmed: 25012816
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2046-54
pubmed: 23798560
J Neurosurg. 2008 Apr;108(4):672-5
pubmed: 18377244
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jan;33(1):12-5
pubmed: 21349960
Radiology. 2020 May;295(2):381-389
pubmed: 32096707
Stroke. 2009 Aug;40(8):e523-9
pubmed: 19520984