Impact of previous nivolumab treatment on the response to taxanes in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.


Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 23 04 2021
revised: 25 08 2021
accepted: 19 09 2021
pubmed: 8 11 2021
medline: 17 12 2021
entrez: 7 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). We aimed to describe response rates to taxanes after progression on nivolumab in R/M HNSCC patients. In this multicentric retrospective comparative study, we included patients treated with taxane monotherapy from 2014 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received nivolumab before taxanes (post-nivolumab group) or not (control group). The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) comparison between the two groups. The secondary end-points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PFS ratio (PFSr=PFS associated with taxanes divided by PFS associated with the previous line of treatment), a survival marker used for comparison of different treatment lines. Between July 2014 and August 2020, 185 patients were included (114 in the control group and 71 in the post-nivolumab group). ORR was significantly higher in the post-nivolumab group (39.4% versus 26.3%, p = 0.03) as was DCR (69% versus 50%, P = 0.06). The median OS (7.5 months) and PFS (3.5 months) were not significantly different in the two groups, whereas PFSr was significantly improved in the post-nivolumab group (1.63 versus 1.11, P = 0.004). Response and DCRs with taxanes are improved after prior exposure to nivolumab. Thus, taxane monotherapy could be a good choice as third-line therapy after nivolumab following a platinum-based first line. These results currently apply to patients without access to or potential benefit from first-line pembrolizumab.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are widely used in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). We aimed to describe response rates to taxanes after progression on nivolumab in R/M HNSCC patients.
METHODS
In this multicentric retrospective comparative study, we included patients treated with taxane monotherapy from 2014 to 2020. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received nivolumab before taxanes (post-nivolumab group) or not (control group). The primary end-point was objective response rate (ORR) comparison between the two groups. The secondary end-points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PFS ratio (PFSr=PFS associated with taxanes divided by PFS associated with the previous line of treatment), a survival marker used for comparison of different treatment lines.
RESULTS
Between July 2014 and August 2020, 185 patients were included (114 in the control group and 71 in the post-nivolumab group). ORR was significantly higher in the post-nivolumab group (39.4% versus 26.3%, p = 0.03) as was DCR (69% versus 50%, P = 0.06). The median OS (7.5 months) and PFS (3.5 months) were not significantly different in the two groups, whereas PFSr was significantly improved in the post-nivolumab group (1.63 versus 1.11, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION
Response and DCRs with taxanes are improved after prior exposure to nivolumab. Thus, taxane monotherapy could be a good choice as third-line therapy after nivolumab following a platinum-based first line. These results currently apply to patients without access to or potential benefit from first-line pembrolizumab.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34743067
pii: S0959-8049(21)01125-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.025
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bridged-Ring Compounds 0
Taxoids 0
Docetaxel 15H5577CQD
taxane 1605-68-1
Nivolumab 31YO63LBSN
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

125-132

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Emeline Guiard (E)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France. Electronic address: emelineguiard@gmail.com.

Florian Clatot (F)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France.

Caroline Even (C)

Head and Neck Medical Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Marion Perréard (M)

Head and Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital, Caen, France.

Cyril Abdeddaim (C)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

Alison Johnson (A)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Elodie Vauléon (E)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.

Audrey Rambeau (A)

Medical Oncology Department, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH