How Semantically Labeled Scent-Gender Associations Influence the Evaluations of Scent and Texture.
haptics
multisensory experiences
olfaction
scent-gender associations
sensory marketing
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
22
05
2021
accepted:
28
09
2021
entrez:
8
11
2021
pubmed:
9
11
2021
medline:
9
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sensory evaluation can be influenced by semantic information such as gender descriptions. Gender categories are associated with tactile information (e.g., female = soft/smooth, while male = hard/rough). Feminine scents (e.g., floral) are typically perceived as soft and smooth. Thus, semantic labels of gender (feminine/masculine qualities) may influence congruent sensory evaluation (i.e., female = soft/smooth, male = hard/rough). This study examined how semantically labeled scent-gender associations influence the evaluation of scent and texture. Specifically, we examined whether "feminine" and "masculine" labels applied to neutral scents that have not been associated with gender influence scent and haptic evaluation. Participants sniffed a feminine-labeled or masculine-labeled scent embedded on soft and rough papers. They then evaluated the scent (e.g., gender perception) and texture (e.g., hedonic evaluation). The results demonstrated that participants who sniffed a feminine-labeled (vs. masculine-labeled) scent perceived it as more feminine. However, contrary to our expectations, gender labeling of scent did not influence haptic evaluation. These findings indicate that semantic labeling of scents (i.e., feminine/masculine) may alter the gender perception of a scent but not the tactile evaluation. Practical implications for (online) sensory marketing are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34744873
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713329
pmc: PMC8566334
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
713329Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Iseki, Motoki, Sakata and Kitagami.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):971-95
pubmed: 21264748
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Sep;146(2):161-71
pubmed: 12195518
Neuron. 2005 May 19;46(4):671-9
pubmed: 15944134
Chem Senses. 1998 Feb;23(1):31-8
pubmed: 9530967
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Jun 26;6(1):46
pubmed: 34173932
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Aug;81(6):2063-2077
pubmed: 31044396
Psychol Bull. 1994 Nov;116(3):429-56
pubmed: 7809307
PeerJ. 2015 May 12;3:e955
pubmed: 26020010
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):26-8
pubmed: 21106884
Chem Senses. 2006 May;31(4):291-300
pubmed: 16452454
Exp Brain Res. 2003 May;150(2):201-7
pubmed: 12679862
Acta Otolaryngol. 2003 May;123(4):536-42
pubmed: 12809108
Chem Senses. 2008 Feb;33(2):211-22
pubmed: 18071196
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Nov;89(5):672-85
pubmed: 16351361
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Mar;124(3):332-43
pubmed: 16762303
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Nov;81(5):828-41
pubmed: 11708560