Risk factors associated with shortened latency before delivery in outpatients managed for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.
home care
latency
oligohydramnios
prematurity
preterm delivery
preterm prelabor rupture of membranes
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
revised:
19
10
2021
received:
26
08
2021
accepted:
19
10
2021
pubmed:
9
11
2021
medline:
4
2
2022
entrez:
8
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in 3% of pregnancies and is the main cause (~30%) of premature delivery. Home care seems to be a safe alternative for the management of patients with PPROM, who have a longer latency than those with PPROM managed with conventional hospitalization. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with a shortened latency before delivery in women with PPROM managed as outpatients. The design was a retrospective cohort study and the setting was a Monocentric Tertiary centre (Lille University Hospital, France) from 2009 to 2018. All consecutive patients in home care after PPROM at 24-36 weeks were included. For the main outcome measure we calculated the latency ratio for each patient as the ratio of the real latency period to the expected latency period, expressed as a percentage. The risk factors influencing this latency ratio were evaluated. A total of 234 patients were managed at home after PPROM. Mean latency was 35.5 ± 20.7 days, corresponding to an 80% latency ratio. In 196 (83.8%) patients the length of home care was more than 7 days. A lower latency ratio was significantly associated with oligohydramnios (p < 0.001), gestational age at PPROM (p = 0.006), leukocyte count at PPROM more than 12 × 10 Women with PPROM managed with home care are stable. The main risk factor associated with a reduced latency is oligohydramnios. Outpatients with oligohydramnios should be informed of the probability of a shortened latency period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34747005
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14287
pmc: PMC9564696
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-126Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Jan;81(1):61-4
pubmed: 8416463
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 May;236:1-6
pubmed: 30870741
BJOG. 2016 Sep;123(10):1629-35
pubmed: 27245741
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Mar;27(4):338-41
pubmed: 23777279
BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):e152-e166
pubmed: 31207667
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar;212(3):400.e1-9
pubmed: 25613399
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 Nov;22(11):1051-6
pubmed: 19900043
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:217-224
pubmed: 28068594
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 04;11(3):e0150217
pubmed: 26942752
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jan;11(1):23-9
pubmed: 9511192
Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84
pubmed: 18177778
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 May;38(5):433-40
pubmed: 27261218
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jan;101(1):119-126
pubmed: 34747005
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0182731
pubmed: 28813455
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Sep;31(17):2284-2292
pubmed: 28612662
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):e0166794
pubmed: 27861554
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005 Sep;32(3):411-28
pubmed: 16125041
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2014 Apr;42(4):222-8
pubmed: 24679599
BMJ. 2017 Aug 16;358:j3448
pubmed: 28814566
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;53(2):119-24
pubmed: 23216409
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Feb;136(2):145-150
pubmed: 28099729
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;301(1):61-67
pubmed: 31760462
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3:CD004454
pubmed: 28321847
Am J Perinatol. 2008 Jan;25(1):69-73
pubmed: 18075965
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):230-8
pubmed: 25621457
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Aug;78(2):153-5
pubmed: 12175717
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 30;339(5):313-20
pubmed: 9682045
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 03;3:CD004735
pubmed: 28257562
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 Oct;147(1):83-88
pubmed: 31291474
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jul;223(1):114.e1-114.e20
pubmed: 32591087
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 02;(12):CD001058
pubmed: 24297389
J Pediatr. 2017 Mar;182:47-52.e2
pubmed: 28081890
Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):443-56
pubmed: 20732945
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jul;33(13):2274-2283
pubmed: 32089027
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Dec;97(12):1499-1507
pubmed: 30080248
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;283(4):707-10
pubmed: 20306063
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016 Mar;45(3):278-84
pubmed: 25847826
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 May;137(2):180-184
pubmed: 28186639
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;19(6):565-9
pubmed: 12047535
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):449-55
pubmed: 24695905
Arch Pediatr. 2015 Oct;22(10):1056-63
pubmed: 26303021