What really matters: a patient-centered instrument to evaluate health-related quality of life in cardiovascular disease.
Health-related quality of life • Health outcome • Patient-reported outcome measure • Preference based • Cardiovascular disease • Quality of care
Journal
European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
ISSN: 2058-1742
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101677796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 10 2022
26 10 2022
Historique:
received:
06
10
2021
accepted:
01
11
2021
revised:
27
10
2021
pubmed:
9
11
2021
medline:
29
10
2022
entrez:
8
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are increasingly used to guide decision-making in cardiovascular care. However, many of the existing PROMs are developed with limited patient involvement and overlook personal health preferences. We aim to develop a cardiovascular disease (CVD)-specific patient-centred preference-based PROM to assess and monitor HRQoL in CVD patients. A mixed-methods study consisting of several phases was conducted to identify important health items: (i) a scoping literature review, (ii) first- and second-round expert group meetings, (iii) interviews with CVD patients, and (iv) an online survey asking CVD patients to indicate from a large set those health items that are considered the most important. The literature review, expert group meetings, and patient interviews resulted in a list of 55 items potentially important to CVD patients. In total, 666 CVD patients responded to the survey. The following nine items were considered the most important by CVD patients: mobility, activities, self-reliance, fatigue, shortness of breath, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety/worrying, and sexual limitations. An electronic preference-based PROM consisting of these nine items was developed within a cloud-based environment for clinical implementation. Nine items considered the most important for health by CVD patients were identified and included in a new preference-based patient-centred PROM. This new CVD-specific PROM can be easily implemented using the electronic application and has the potential to improve quality of care for CVD patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34747990
pii: 6423429
doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab079
pmc: PMC9603540
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
722-729Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;195:216-24
pubmed: 26048380
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Jun 22;18(1):62
pubmed: 29929469
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):11-23
pubmed: 26889874
Resuscitation. 2018 Feb;123:22-37
pubmed: 29191703
Circulation. 2014 Oct 7;130(15):1254-61
pubmed: 25200210
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 31;13(8):e0203276
pubmed: 30169510
Circulation. 2017 Jun 6;135(23):2299-2307
pubmed: 28584030
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;6(4):234-242
pubmed: 32170937
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Nov 15;14(1):159
pubmed: 27846850
Qual Life Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1465-1475
pubmed: 30632050
Circ Res. 2017 Jan 20;120(2):366-380
pubmed: 28104770
Phys Ther. 2018 Jul 1;98(7):616-625
pubmed: 29939365
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Nov;139:96-106
pubmed: 34273526
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jan;67(1):37-43
pubmed: 28905303
Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):2233-49
pubmed: 23648778
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:93-105
pubmed: 32565219