Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research.
paradigm
patient engagement
patient-oriented research
pragmatic research
pragmatism
youth engagement
Journal
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
revised:
20
10
2021
received:
07
07
2021
accepted:
27
10
2021
pubmed:
9
11
2021
medline:
15
3
2022
entrez:
8
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient-oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate research methods to address issues at hand, where complex social problems need multipronged approaches. As an emerging healthcare research strategy, POR actively engages individuals with lived experience across all stages of the research process. While POR continues to garner attention within mixed-methods research designs, there is a paucity of literature that considers POR in relation to pragmatism. As POR grows in popularity within the field of health care, there is a need to explore the theoretical and epistemological alignment with pragmatism and the implications to research. To address this need, we provide a critical review of the literature to examine the synergies between POR and pragmatism, and argue for the adoption of pragmatism as a paradigm for conducting POR. This article begins with a discussion of the philosophical underpinnings informing the pragmatic paradigm. It then identifies key alignments between POR and pragmatism across three intersecting concepts: democratic values, collaborative approaches to problem-solving and the pursuit of social justice. Reflecting on our experiences engaging with patient partners in a mixed-methods POR study titled READY2Exit, we illustrate the relevance of pragmatism to POR by applying these concepts to practice. Implications and considerations for conducting POR within the pragmatic paradigm are also described. This paper provides a critical review of the literature and did not directly involve patients or the public. The authors reflected on their experiences collaborating with five young adult patient partners in the READY2Exit study (case exemplar described in this article) to demonstrate the relevance of the pragmatic paradigm to POR. We acknowledge and thank the young adult patient partners for their contributions to the research, for encouraging us to think critically about patient engagement in research, and for sharing their experiences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Mixed methods research studies continue to pervade the field of health care, where pragmatism as a research paradigm and patient-oriented research (POR) as an engagement strategy are combined to strengthen the process and outcomes of the research. Pragmatists use the most appropriate research methods to address issues at hand, where complex social problems need multipronged approaches. As an emerging healthcare research strategy, POR actively engages individuals with lived experience across all stages of the research process. While POR continues to garner attention within mixed-methods research designs, there is a paucity of literature that considers POR in relation to pragmatism.
OBJECTIVE
As POR grows in popularity within the field of health care, there is a need to explore the theoretical and epistemological alignment with pragmatism and the implications to research.
METHODS
To address this need, we provide a critical review of the literature to examine the synergies between POR and pragmatism, and argue for the adoption of pragmatism as a paradigm for conducting POR.
MAIN RESULTS
This article begins with a discussion of the philosophical underpinnings informing the pragmatic paradigm. It then identifies key alignments between POR and pragmatism across three intersecting concepts: democratic values, collaborative approaches to problem-solving and the pursuit of social justice.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Reflecting on our experiences engaging with patient partners in a mixed-methods POR study titled READY2Exit, we illustrate the relevance of pragmatism to POR by applying these concepts to practice. Implications and considerations for conducting POR within the pragmatic paradigm are also described.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
This paper provides a critical review of the literature and did not directly involve patients or the public. The authors reflected on their experiences collaborating with five young adult patient partners in the READY2Exit study (case exemplar described in this article) to demonstrate the relevance of the pragmatic paradigm to POR. We acknowledge and thank the young adult patient partners for their contributions to the research, for encouraging us to think critically about patient engagement in research, and for sharing their experiences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34748689
doi: 10.1111/hex.13384
pmc: PMC8849373
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
38-47Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Pediatr Psychol. 2011 Mar;36(2):160-71
pubmed: 20040605
J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45
pubmed: 25825842
Health Care Anal. 2008 Jun;16(2):127-44
pubmed: 17929171
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 11;6:41
pubmed: 32670611
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):38-47
pubmed: 34748689
Future Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(28):3691-3704
pubmed: 34337970
CMAJ. 2018 Nov 7;190(Suppl):S53-S54
pubmed: 30404857
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 7;16(1):5
pubmed: 29415734
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;29(5):463-472
pubmed: 28681616
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Fall;13(1):27-51
pubmed: 9068236
Am J Bioeth. 2014;14(6):29-31
pubmed: 24809605
J Med Ethics. 2013 Mar;39(3):181-5
pubmed: 22267385
J Natl Med Assoc. 1991 Sep;83(9):777-81
pubmed: 1942111
J Health Psychol. 2009 Sep;14(6):800-9
pubmed: 19687117
Child Care Health Dev. 2011 Nov;37(6):883-95
pubmed: 22007989
Congenit Heart Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;10(5):413-27
pubmed: 25659600
Pediatrics. 2018 Nov;142(5):
pubmed: 30348754
Contemp Nurse. 2006 Dec-2007 Jan;23(2):145-53
pubmed: 17343517
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jun 16;6:30
pubmed: 32550002