What you don't know can hurt you: Patient and provider perspectives on postpartum contraceptive care in Illinois Catholic Hospitals.

Catholic, moral distress, patient perspectives, postpartum contraception religious restrictions stigma

Journal

Contraception
ISSN: 1879-0518
Titre abrégé: Contraception
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0234361

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
received: 27 04 2021
revised: 16 10 2021
accepted: 20 10 2021
pubmed: 9 11 2021
medline: 23 4 2022
entrez: 8 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Catholic Religious and Ethical Directives restrict access to contraception; yet offering contraception during a delivery hospitalization facilitates birth spacing and is a convenient option for patients during the postpartum period. We assessed patient and provider experiences with hospital transparency around postpartum contraceptive care in Illinois Catholic Hospitals. We interviewed 44 participants with experience in Illinois Catholic Hospitals: 21 patients, and 23 providers, including clinicians, nurses, doulas, and postpartum program staff. We used an open-ended interview approach, with a semistructured guide focused on postpartum contraceptive care. We conducted interviews by phone between November 2019 and June 2020. We audio-recorded interviews, transcribed them verbatim, and coded transcripts in Dedoose. We developed narrative memos for each code, identifying themes and subthemes. We organized these in a matrix for analysis and present here themes regarding hospital transparency that emerged across interviews. Many patients knew they were delivering in a Catholic hospital; however, few were aware that Catholic policies limited their health care options. Patients expressed a desire for hospitals to be transparent, even "very vocal," about religious restrictions and described consequences of restrictions on patient care. Patients lacked information to make contraceptive decisions, experienced limits on or delays in care, and some lost continuity with trusted providers. Consequences for providers included moral distress in trying to provide care using workarounds such as documenting false medical diagnoses. Religious restrictions on postpartum contraception restrict access, cause unnecessary delays in care, and lead to misdiagnosis and marginalization of contraceptive care. Restrictions also cause moral distress to providers who balance career repercussions and professional integrity with patient needs. To protect patient autonomy, especially during the vulnerable postpartum period, Catholic hospitals should increase transparency regarding limitations on reproductive health care. Insurers and policy-makers should guarantee that patients have the option to receive care at hospitals without these limitations and facilitate public education about what to expect at Catholic facilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34748754
pii: S0010-7824(21)00437-6
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.10.004
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contraceptive Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

62-67

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Zarina J Wong (ZJ)

University of Chicago, Department of Family Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; University of Chicago, Ci3, Chicago, IL, United States.

Lee Thompson (L)

University of Chicago, Department of Family Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Angel Boulware (A)

University of Chicago, Department of Family Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Jessica Chen (J)

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Lori Freedman (L)

University of California, ANSIRH, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Debra Stulberg (D)

University of Chicago, Department of Family Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.

Lee Hasselbacher (L)

University of Pennsylvania, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: lhasselbacher@uchicago.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH