A quantitative comparison between using sodium hypochlorite as a digestion method for the diatom test and the conventional method using fuming nitric acid.

Alternative digestion method Diatom test Drowning Forensic pathology Sodium hypochlorite

Journal

Forensic science international
ISSN: 1872-6283
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Int
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 7902034

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Historique:
received: 10 08 2021
revised: 23 09 2021
accepted: 25 10 2021
pubmed: 9 11 2021
medline: 9 11 2021
entrez: 8 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the efficacy of using sodium hypochlorite (NaClO, Purelox) as a simple and rapid alternative digestion method for the diatom test through a quantitative comparison with the conventional method that uses fuming nitric acid (HNO In experiment 1, using 30 water samples, the NaClO and HNO The NaClO method was completed within 80 min for any sample. In experiment 1, there was no significant difference between the NaClO and HNO Using NaClO as a simple and rapid digestion method for diatom testing of water samples would be an excellent alternative to conventional methods. Although the method's diatom detection rate for the lung samples was not optimal, it was still shown to be a feasible method.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34749279
pii: S0379-0738(21)00406-0
doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111086
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

111086

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interest None.

Auteurs

Shigeki Tsuneya (S)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan. Electronic address: tsuneya-tky@umin.ac.jp.

Makoto Nakajima (M)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Yohsuke Makino (Y)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

Suguru Torimitsu (S)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

Rutsuko Yamaguchi (R)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

Hirotaro Iwase (H)

Department of Forensic Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan; Department of Legal Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

Classifications MeSH