Optimized somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in elite Argentinian sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivars.
Biotechnological breeding
Callus
Genotype dependence
Somatic embryos
Tissue culture
Journal
Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology
ISSN: 2090-5920
Titre abrégé: J Genet Eng Biotechnol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101317150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Nov 2021
08 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
26
07
2021
accepted:
13
10
2021
entrez:
9
11
2021
pubmed:
10
11
2021
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Biotechnological breeding of elite sugarcane cultivars is currently limited because of the difficulty of regenerating plants by tissue culture. Here, we report that commercially elite sugarcane genotypes, which are adapted to Argentinian agro-ecological conditions, are capable of being regenerated via indirect somatic embryogenesis. Leaf rolls of five elite genotypes were cultured following two callus induction protocols using different concentrations of 2,4-D as the growth regulator. Embryogenic calluses were regenerated under light conditions. Regenerated plants were subsequently acclimatized in the greenhouse under two acclimatization procedures before being transplanted to the field. Four of the five genotypes were able to form somatic embryos following the two induction protocols. The variables related to embryogenic callus production were influenced by the interaction between genotype and culture conditions. For plant regeneration, the embryogenic calluses were further cultured on an IBA-supplemented medium, where we observed a high genotype dependence. Calluses from the four cultivars regenerated a good number of plants. With the procedures described here, we obtained more than 90% of well-acclimatized plants both in the greenhouse and in the field. This protocol provides a simple way to regenerate sugarcane plants through indirect somatic embryogenesis. Also, the results confirm that tissue culture ability is highly genotype-dependent in sugarcane. Our findings suggest that these elite cultivars could be good candidates for biotechnological breeding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Biotechnological breeding of elite sugarcane cultivars is currently limited because of the difficulty of regenerating plants by tissue culture. Here, we report that commercially elite sugarcane genotypes, which are adapted to Argentinian agro-ecological conditions, are capable of being regenerated via indirect somatic embryogenesis. Leaf rolls of five elite genotypes were cultured following two callus induction protocols using different concentrations of 2,4-D as the growth regulator. Embryogenic calluses were regenerated under light conditions. Regenerated plants were subsequently acclimatized in the greenhouse under two acclimatization procedures before being transplanted to the field.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Four of the five genotypes were able to form somatic embryos following the two induction protocols. The variables related to embryogenic callus production were influenced by the interaction between genotype and culture conditions. For plant regeneration, the embryogenic calluses were further cultured on an IBA-supplemented medium, where we observed a high genotype dependence. Calluses from the four cultivars regenerated a good number of plants. With the procedures described here, we obtained more than 90% of well-acclimatized plants both in the greenhouse and in the field.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This protocol provides a simple way to regenerate sugarcane plants through indirect somatic embryogenesis. Also, the results confirm that tissue culture ability is highly genotype-dependent in sugarcane. Our findings suggest that these elite cultivars could be good candidates for biotechnological breeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34750689
doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00270-8
pii: 10.1186/s43141-021-00270-8
pmc: PMC8575717
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
171Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Acta Cient Venez. 2002;53(4):251-7
pubmed: 12945490
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;23(2):265-70
pubmed: 21983270
Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2009 Jul;15(3):257-65
pubmed: 23572935
Nat Genet. 2018 Nov;50(11):1565-1573
pubmed: 30297971